26 Comments
User's avatar
Hannahlehigh's avatar

Candace said he was buried in a Catholic cemetery, I believe if he was alive she wouldn't be going thru whats she's going thru, she's the only one who's trying to get to the bottom of it, she has people sending tips to help though. Erika to me is creepy and her organization stole data from thousands of people at his memorial, then they started sending them donation requests, its all so lowlife of them.

Expand full comment
California Girl's avatar

If ChatGPT can find no credible records, then neither could I - not that I've looked. The commentors I've read have yet to report the existence of credible records, I could not improve on that.

You'd think that if the missing records were found and described, then Kirk's death would be easier to accept as fact instead of fiction. That this has yet to happen suggests that TPTB just don't care what we believe. Kirk no longer has a stage and that is all they care about.

Thank you for your diligence in this matter!

Expand full comment
MacGuffin's avatar

So weird, and let's not even bother to ask about Charlie and Erika's oft-present but always-looking-AWAY-from-the-camera 'children'.

Expand full comment
PatriciaE's avatar

Someone KILLED him ! Do you not think he was receiving threats and children should be afforded some privacy ??

Expand full comment
Franklin O'Kanu's avatar

The devil is in the details. No sign certificate means the man is technically still alive.

Everything we see on TV is a performance, a narrative.

Charlie’s isn’t the first person “killed” off: https://unorthodoxy.substack.com/p/the-charlie-kirk-assassination-when

Expand full comment
Al's avatar

Interesting. Thanks for doing this. Though I have worked with computers most of my life, I find my tolerance for the "garbage out" is causing me to disengage. These LLMs are nothing but Facebook on steroids. I advise everyone to protect their identities.

Expand full comment
Alan's avatar

I think more generally that we've entered, as humanity, into the Era of Fakery. Videos can be computer-generated to look real. What does this mean for video "evidence" of a crime?

Obviously, paper documents can be doctored. What does this mean for any alleged "Epstein files"?

When someone can maybe be involved in two fake assassinations, and the politically antagonistic media gives it a free pass, where are we?

Expand full comment
Joe Surkiewicz's avatar

Screwed.

Expand full comment
Robert Auld's avatar

1. You should NOT trust anything that ChatGPT or any other AI program says without verifying it with other sources. Sharyl Attkisson has just published an article about this very subject, that AI programs tell lies. Here is the link:

https://sharylattkisson.substack.com/p/ai-is-a-liar-heres-why-thats-so-dangerous?utm_source=post-email-title&publication_id=2579146&post_id=177623453&utm_campaign=email-post-title&isFreemail=true&r=b7z4x&triedRedirect=true&utm_medium=email

2. There is much misunderstanding about autopsy procedures and death certificate procedures. Here is a mortician talking about those procedures as they apply to the Charlie Kirk shooting:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lOJs81gbaKI&list=PLB9M-wcuTog2UCHAMH6GgrLEre0ie3UmQ&index=126

Expand full comment
Donald Wood's avatar

These are mysterious times, so many things remain so.

Expand full comment
Mostly disagreeable's avatar

How long before there are Charlie Kirk sightings?

Expand full comment
Joe Surkiewicz's avatar

Like Bigfoot.

Expand full comment
Mostly disagreeable's avatar

And Elvis.

Expand full comment
Christine's avatar

Sad, but yes. It’s inevitable. 🙄

Expand full comment
Ellen's avatar

Not legally verified dead could also mean there's something about his wounds, body, cause of death, something, that "they" don't want seen. Or could mean very much alive ... I may be wrong, but to wrap my head around Charlie Kirk faking his own death ... I'd have to doubt not just my sense of Charlie (had barely known of him til Sept10th), but also my trust that most of the people I trust have a wise trust radar - many of them personally knew Charlie and respected him, even if lots to disagree on.

What I can wrap my head around, is as Candace said, "was everything in Charlie's life a Truman show?" Was Erika sent to show up in his life? A lot not to trust, but alleging he faked his death is a bit too far .. at least, seems so now ...

Either way, much does not add up ... https://georgewebb.substack.com/

Expand full comment
robert stiles's avatar

We know that Benjy Mileikowsky did not kill Charlie since twice he said he didn't. And I believe everything Benjy says

Expand full comment
PatriciaE's avatar

This substack has devolved into the Enquirer of old. Next thing we know Charlie is on the comet that is passing through the solar system. It’s ridiculous and maligns the integrity of a good man ( an exceptional man) and those around him. How offensive is it to you when someones dies and you can’t fit them into your box ?

Expand full comment
emma portman's avatar

We all wish it was ridiculous. Tragically we are in the depressing situation where the evidence says we have been hoodwinked. again.

Expand full comment
PatriciaE's avatar

You have no evidence . You have conjecture.

Expand full comment
emma portman's avatar

Professor Miller just showed you the evidence. Did you read it?

Expand full comment
Sam_in_the_UK's avatar

5th gen psychology warfare (as it has been appropriately dubbed) is a type of extension of perception management, beyond the Bernaysian concept of public relations and moving towards the realms of science fiction.

For some context, Vladislav Surkov is one of Vladimir Putin's advisors and has been influenced by Russian futurists such as the filmmaker Andrei Tarkovsky (who directed the movie 'Stalker' in 1979). Tarkovsky and the Russian futurist movement influenced those within Russian politics to develop the political vision to see reality as something that could be moulded into shape much like the public perceptions of political life through newspapers and the press.

In many ways, the Western public were not given much information on the political developments that took place in the formerly soviet countries following the collapse of the soviet union and because of this, Western civilian populations were not subject to the same level of subversive distractions that occurred in Russia, China, Cuba, Venezuela etc. Instead Western countries were on the whole encouraged to buy things and develop a consumer culture that profited the corporations, much as Bernays had originally envisaged. Meanwhile in Russia and other formerly Soviet countries, more revolutionary approaches were taken in order to influence their civilian populations which were not only encouraging their citizenry to consume but how to think in a certain way. Some of these developments can be seen in Adam Curtis' documentary 'Hypernormalisation'.

Events like the one that occurred in Utah on October 10th 2025 should be viewed in much the same light that we all viewed the covid/lockdowns (and then "vaccine") push in 2020, the washington DC capitol "insurrection" in January 2021, the Trump assassination attempts in july 2024 and September 2024 and even the earlier Israel October 7th 2023 incident. There are too many variables that make these official stories an over simplified cover for something much more convoluted and devious.

What was WEF member Yuval Noah Harari telling us about the symbiosis between man and machine? Was it just about the "vaccines" or was it about these mRNA products ability to hypnotise the public so that these public perceptions could become manifest as 'reality' to a large percentage of the population?

Expand full comment
Swanee's avatar

We still don't even know who killed JFK (ahem...CIA...cough, cough), so what makes anyone think that this would be any different?

Expand full comment
AnnR's avatar
Oct 31Edited

Dr. Miller, do YOU think he is alive? Or are you just open to the possibility, as many of us are? I have been watching Baron Coleman on Youtube who is digging into the REAL "who" of this mystery. And it may be there is no death certificate for public view because that would open up the question as to where is the coroner's report, which THAT could show that it wasn't the kind of round that the government is saying, and that it wasn't at the angle from the alleged rooftop, and so on. And perhaps it wasn't a bullet at all. It's all so murky.

Expand full comment
Lorraine Thomas's avatar

This is all stupid talk! Yes…Charlie is dead! Candace is a grifter or worse! Making millions off his death! Those who follow her are under some kind of dark delusion! She’s got many swayed and under her control! Sad! People no longer critically think…they buy into the most outlandish garbage out there! And Candace puts out garbage!

Expand full comment