They're free to keep on killing us, as long as we keep thinking that they couldn't be that evil

Thus they rely on us to serve as our own thought police

Here’s a post by Dr. Meryl Nass, which makes the crucial point that those intent on killing us have been protected from discovery—and punishment—by our own inability to think that THAT could possibly be true.

This is, as I say, the crucial point; because, once we snap out of that fond fantasy of their benevolence, and face the fact that, yes, they are that evil, and (worse yet) that all the institutions we’ve been taught to trust from childhood on—the government at nearly every level, the medical establishment, “higher education” and (above all) “our free press”—have been corrupted by that evil, and are now part of it: once We the People, or enough of us, stop thinking that that can’t be true, then everything will change.

Only when enough of us accept that shattering fact will everything begin to change—and fast. No evidence against the “vaccination” horror, however solid and (to us) compelling it may be, can penetrate the minds that just don’t want to know what all such solid evidence so obviously means—i.e., that those great institutions claiming to respect “the science,” and to want to keep us “safe,” and lead us “back to normal,” have actually—deliberately, and systematically—denied “the science” all along; consistently discouraged effective regimens and remedies, while fiercely pushing products known to kill or cripple us; and otherwise explicitly conspired to acclimate all human beings (that is, those left alive) to “life” in an inhuman world.

Confronted with that likelihood, it’s only natural that people, by and large, don’t want to think it’s true—just as a child long horribly abused at home will often have “forgotten” it years later, and angrily resist the therapeutic understanding that it happened. Whereas, in such a case, the therapist is mainly up against the patient’s own psychic defenses, we who have been trying to waken all those others up to what’s been done to them (and us) these past few years (and even earlier) are up against a force far bigger—and a lot more dangerous—than any individual’s internal blinders. It is to keep those millions in denial, and thereby prevent the global Reckoning to come, that the government-and-media’s gigantic propaganda chorus keeps assuring them that, no, it isn’t true, that all our evidence (of every kind) is “conspiracy theory,” all our facts “disinformation,” all those sudden and untimely deaths and grievous disabilities entirely normal, and yet also due to anything and everything but the “vaccines” that have obviously caused them. And as the propaganda chorus struggles to prevent that Day of Reckoning by doubling down on all its Oceanic lies, it also ever more extensively, and desperately, blacks out whatever findings, facts, perceptions and/or arguments might help snap people out of their hypnotic trance: Google (for example) quickly took down Dr. Nass’s piece, when she posted it (or tried to) on her blog.

Effective as such Nazi stratagems may be in keeping some of us asleep, those Big Lies can’t keep working as they did between the rollout of “the virus” and the second year of universal “vaccination,” nor can the censorship, however sweeping it may be, keep everyone completely in the dark. Sooner than you think, the people (or enough of us) will see, and not deny, that those “vaccines” are killing and disabling people in unprecedented numbers—killing children in unprecedented numbers—and yet all those august institutions keep on pushing still more “vaccination” anyway. And when that happens, everything will change, and not the way Klaus Schwab et al. have hoped.

Ghoulishly clever psyop pits our own defense mechanisms against us

Prevents the vaccinated from seeing the light as it is just too painful

Meryl Nass

Aug 6

 1.  Multiple papers now suggest that COVID mRNA vaccines impair not just immunity to COVID, but immunity and immune surveillance overall.

The implication is that the vaxxed are more susceptible to a variety of infections, and perhaps also to cancer.  Immune surveillance is what identifies cancer cells and kills them before they can proliferate.

So, you are vaccinated.  The implications of this information are too frightening to be allowed into consciousness.  You don't need the external censors to suppress this knowledge; you do it automatically with your built-in defense mechanisms.

2.  Data from multiple countries now shows that all cause mortality (deaths from everything) are higher in the vaccinated.

This is just as scary, if not more so, than an increased risk of serious infections and cancer.  You deny and/or suppress this information, because it simply cannot be allowed to be true.

3.  You vaccinated your child.  This may have impaired their fertility, increased the cancer risk, etc. etc. etc.

Of all pieces of information that absolutely cannot be allowed to enter your consciousness, let alone be openly discussed in polite company, this one tops all.  So you will simply refuse to allow mention of it.  Friends whose conversations veer off in this direction must be obliterated.  Requiring that all family members and friends be vaccinated protects you from facing those for whom this discussion does not trigger the existential and uncontrollable pain it does for the vaccinated.

 And Voila--you have a controlled and cowed population who have become their own thought police.