TV news anchor blubbers over "sudden death" of a young colleague: GRIEF PORN that distracts us—and her—from asking WHY he died so suddenly and young
It's hard to feel much sympathy for "journalists" whose blind compliance with the "vaccination" drive is killing even them, along with all the others they have misled so disastrously—and unforgivably
UPDATE on 10/24/22:
We have only just now learned that Matthew Rodrigopulle was “fully vaccinated”/ boosted, and that he publicly applauded the decision in Saskatchewan to start “vaccinating” children from the age of 5.
Rodrigopulle’s “vaccination” status, and his zeal, were reported by the Rair Foundation on Sept. 22, eleven days after our post on Global News Toronto’s mawkish take on his untimely death, the such “grief porn” in general.
https://rairfoundation.com/vaccinated-and-boosted-tv-reporter-24-dies-suddenly-and-unexpectedly-video/
This Global News Toronto anchor, Kimberley Fowler, tearfully reports the sudden death of Matthew Rodrigopulle, a young colleague (she doesn’t say how old he was) who obviously died before his time, and—as usual, and crucially—for no apparent reason: She doesn’t say what he died of, nor has his family: “Matthew’s cause of death has not been officially released by his family at the time of this publication,” reports SNBC13. (Another outlet claims that Rodrigopulle “died suddenly of natural causes.”)
https://snbc13.com/matthew-rodrigopulle-global-news-live-reporter-digital-broadcast-journalist-has-died/
https://ontherecordnews.ca/in-memoriam-matthew-rodrigopulle/
This news has ricocheted around the Internet since yesterday—due not so much to Rodrigopulle’s sudden death per se as to the anchor’s discomposure in announcing it. In other words, the “story” here is not his death, but her grief over it: a powerful diversion from the awful truth. Since Global News Toronto doesn’t want to know what killed that member of their “family,” and doesn’t want its viewers even wondering about it, much less asking for a bit more information, that showy grief is an effective way at once to “honor Rodrigopulle’s memory,” and yet discourage any effort to discover why he died, since they’re all just too broken up to think about it, so anyone who bothers them about it has no heart.
This certainly is not to say that Fowler’s grief was feigned, or that the “Global Regina family” have not been genuinely hurt by that bereavement. The point here, rather, is that Rodrigopulle’s colleagues have unconsciously, or semi-consciously, let their (authentic) grief become the “story,” as a way to keep the reason for his sudden passing hidden even from themselves—as we have seen “our free press” do time after time since “vaccination” started taking its horrific toll among them. That’s how Joy Reid and all the gang at MSNBC obscured the likelihood that “vaccination” killed the legal commentator Midwin Charles, at 47, in April of last year, and how the team at WSB-TV in Atlanta did the same when Jovita Moore, their anchor, died, at 54, of “an aggressive form of brain cancer” last October, and so on. (Charles and Moore had both proudly publicized their “vaccinations”—and so, reportedly, did Rodrigopulle.)
Thus have pro-“vaccination” journalists responded to the “sudden deaths” of their own peers by clouding the details in a protective haze of grief porn, based largely on their own (authentic) grief. Serving only, as it does, to keep the “vaccinations” going, such grief porn is as lethal, and as total a betrayal of true journalism, as the fear porn that the media (both corporate and “alternative”) deployed to start this nightmare in the first place—and that they’re still using to keep all the rest of us in line (and not just by using this or that “new virus,” but Trump, Russia, climate change, gun violence and/or whatever else might do the trick).
For a clear sense of how avidly “our free press” is still pushing “vaccination”—as usual, along with the egregious Dr. Fauci, and the US pharmacy cartel—check out this new report by Jeffrey Loffredo of Rebel News:
After being in Toronto for five years, I feel that the people here are mostly the unthinking type. There's a few enclaves of critical thinkers but they're like the raccoons that come out at night - - sneaky, observant, and ready to fight.
It's all part of a trend. Our society is feelings-based, and therefore those under its spell allow themselves to be controlled via emotional manipulation. Any insistence on objectivity - on the application of cold, clear reasoning - is regarded as poison, unlike those "safe and effective", mice-tested "vaccines".