Boosted as another fight for human rights, "trans activism" now is an inhuman wrong

LGB activists are speaking out against that "movement," which has been doing them, and all the rest of us, more harm than good; and one trans youth tells his horrendous story as its victim

Some day—when we have real schools again, where students learn the painful history of the catastrophe that’s now upon us, and that we will have ended—this moment will be part of the curriculum:

So, as Prof. Bridges sees it (and she’s not the only one), it’s “transphobic” to suggest, in any way, that only women can have babies. If, in other words, you say, or hint (as Sen. Hawley did), that “trans women” can’t have children, it means, clearly, that you hate them.

Now, speaking for myself, I can, with perfect confidence, assure Prof. Bridges, or any of her co-religionists, that I (a) think that only women—or, as she calls them, “cis women”—can have babies, and yet (b) bear no hatred whatsoever toward transgender people. That trans women simply can’t give birth is just (what we might quaintly call) a fact, and not one that I somehow hold against them. (Why would I? Why would anyone?) I find Prof. Bridges’ view (what we might quaintly call) deranged; and, as it happens, so do the transgender people whom I know.

But what I think about all this will (obviously) cut no ice with wild-eyed true believers like Prof. Bridges, who will dismiss it just as readily (and condescendingly) as she dismissed (and evaded) Sen. Hawley’s questions; and I’m sure they’ll just as readily laugh off my claim about transgender people whom I know, and who share my “old” view of female biology. Since I’m “transphobic,” those (rational) transgender people whom I know, and who agree with me, must be the “self-hating” kind, so that their views are necessarily as gross as mine. (As you may know, I myself have been slimed as “transphobic” by the majority of my department colleagues at NYU, who tried to get me fired for it, and several other crimes I never have committed; and so I’m suing them for libel.)

While they have no trouble slandering the views of Straight White Males like Sen. Hawley and myself—and, of course, staunch feminists like Germaine Greer and my friend Meghan Murphy, among many others—Prof. Bridges et al. can’t so easily dismiss the ever-growing opposition to their ideology among gay people:

While “woke” types like Prof. Bridges shield themselves from critical attention by attacking it, absurdly, as “transphobic,” their gay critics rightly charge that such trans activism is, in effect, a homophobic “movement” (as well as a ferociously misogynistic “movement”)—and one that swiftly rose to cultural supremacy with no grass-roots support or struggle whatsoever, as “LGB activist” Belissa Cohen explains in this new interview with Kristina Borjesson:

LGB ACTIVIST BELISSA COHEN: TRANSGENDERS WERE "ASTROTURFED" INTO LGB COMMUNITY

In this recent edition of The Whistleblower Newsroom, Cohen explains why the alphabet and number soup--TQAS2+ (Transgender, Queer and/or Questioning, Intersex, Asexual and Two-Spirit and more (+)-- following "LGB" are actually not part of the lesbian, gay and bi-sexual community and how transgenders were "astroturfed" into the LGB community through generous contributions and heavy propagandizing of LGB organizations by transgender-promoting foundations. Cohen also details why the transgender movement poses particularly dangerous threats to children. Click on link below to watch now:

https://www.bitchute.com/video/6YJHiFBNyg3E/

Cohen’s deft take on “trans activism”—as a “movement” manufactured, and lavishly promoted, for elite purposes—complements this recent essay by my buddy Toby Rogers:

Trans messaging is too sophisticated to be the work of a small sexual minority dealing with severe health issues

What we learn from these acute (and brave) critiques is that “trans activism”—like most other causes on (what calls itself) “the left” today—is, despite its quasi-Bolshevistic rhetoric of “inclusion” and “diversity,” really just another means of furthering the globalist agenda. Certainly “trans activism” is worth billions to such ravenous investors as Bill Gates, Warren Buffett and George Soros, who—as Jennifer Bilek has reported—profit hugely from the stratospheric costs of all those hormone therapies and surgeries. And while it benefits that psychopathic caste financially, “trans activism” also serves its most depraved objectives: depopulation (through the sterilizing impact of those hormone therapies and surgeries); transhumanism (to be realized through the obliteration of all gender differences among the lower orders); elite pedophilia (through the ever-more-explicit sexualization of young children in the public schools); and God knows what else.

To grasp the true depravity of what “trans activism” really means, however, we can—unfortunately—do much better than engage in such dystopian speculation. If you should want a vivid, firsthand sense of just how damaging that “movement” is, I recommend that you now brace yourself, and read this shattering account by one who was seduced by it without informed consent—which children cannot give; so those of us who care for them, in every sense, must stand unflinchingly with those now speaking out against that “woke” abomination.

TullipR/Ritchie 🦎🌈♂ @TullipR

I want to tell everyone what they took from us, what irreversible really means, and what that reality looks like for us. No one told me any of what I’m going to tell you now. 🧵