On getting (slightly) fooled again—and why, by now, it doesn't really matter
At this point, NO fake videos, deliberately false leads, or any other psy-op tricks can finally keep the people in the dark
The other day, as you’ll recall, I posted some horrific close-up video of a huge, fat black-red thing getting pulled out of a beating heart. There were voices over it, marveling at how bizarre it was, recalling John O’Looney’s revelations of the crud he’s pulled these last few years from countless corpses (it may actually have been O’Looney’s voice), and the like findings by researchers in Spain, Germany and elsewhere. On Telegram, where I’d picked it up (and from a site I tend to trust), it appeared to be yet one more image of a post-“vaccination” “blood clot” of the sort that’s now become pandemic, and an especially repulsive one at that. (“In what universe is this a ‘blood clot’?” was my title.)
But that’s not what it was, as Paul (last name unknown) revealed in some persistent comments, finally noting that that footage comes from an instructional video of a thrombectomy, released three years ago, and (of course) without that deceptive conversation playing over it. So I was fooled, and had to take it down (with some disappointment, since the post drew many eyes, and even several paying subscribers).
As it’s the policy at NFU (unlike the New York Times) to note our errors loud and clear, I’m doing that now; but about this recent goof I have a more important point to make, addressing the widespread and wholly rational concern that They are out there seeding cyberspace with bogus images and theories, to lure people into sharing them, so that such stuff can then be thunderously “debunked,” and, with it, all such (somehow) dangerous “conspiracy theories” as to the risks of “vaccination.”
There was a lot of such concern over Stew Peters’ “Died Suddenly,” because among its many images of athletes “dropping dead” was one (or more?) that actually pre-dated COVID; and that documentary had other problems, too, as several keen observers pointed out. Those flaws, and Peters’ earlier wild-eyed endorsement of the snake venom theory, fed speculation that Peters is “controlled opposition”—as he sure could be, and not just because he seems to float whatever cockamamie notion comes along, and with the same fierce certitude, but, still more troublingly, because of his relentless demagogic barking about “communists.” That retro tic may thrill his sector of the audience, but it’s only going to keep them in the dark, c. 1953, since They are something else entirely, the likes of which we’ve never seen before, however much like “communism” their agenda.
So Peters could be controlled opposition. He wouldn’t be the first. The players atop the Empire, or whatever we might call it, have been using such deflective tools forever—as everyone would know, if history were taught in schools, and dramatized in films and on TV, and not near-universally blacked out. The Brits were masters at that sort of thing, as was the Czar’s secret police, and the operatives in service to the other European powers—and it has happened here time after time, since well before the founding of the FBI and CIA last century. It was, back in the day, by infiltrating the (real) left with such fake radicals that those subversive agencies destroyed it. That’s how they crushed the Panthers in the Sixties (see Judas and the Black Messiah, for a rare cinematic rendering of that story), and then Progressive Labor in the Seventies. It was through just such tricks, and others, that those agencies eventually replaced that left with the fascistic (and, yes, communistic) “woke” monstrosity that calls itself “the left” today. Thus they wiped out that (real) left as effectively as they annihilated the (real) liberal movement in the Sixties, by simply murdering JFK, Malcolm (tending liberal by the end), MLK and Bobby Kennedy (and many others at that time). While we’re all (reasonably) focused on that sculptural travesty in Boston, we should recall how radical King’s liberalism really was—and how many agents of the state were therefore planted in his entourage, in furtherance of his death. (I know of two in particular.)
And so it is entirely rational to wonder whether, say, Stew Peters (who’s called Robert Malone “controlled opposition”) is controlled opposition, or, likewise, whether “Dr. Shiva” Ayyadurai (who’s called Bobby Kennedy “controlled opposition”) is controlled opposition. Some of my best friends think so of Malone, and of Peter McCullough, and of Mattias Desmet, too, though I do not. This game can easily get out of hand, thereby itself accomplishing the same divisive end that such state agents would deliberately pursue; and so it’s wise to play it very, very carefully.
But let’s suppose that they’re all assets: Peters, “Dr. Shiva,” Bobby, Desmet, McCullough and Malone (and let’s say I’m one, too, along with anybody else you care to name). And, therefore, let’s say that Peters’ “Died Suddenly” was crafted as disinformation, with truth and falsehood intermingled, so as to help Them put an end to all the ever-growing mass distrust that “our free press” is doing everything it can to demonize. So what? If such was its true purpose, that documentary was a gigantic dud—because it was essentially correct, and very powerful despite its flaws, and therefore finally did more good than harm. Whatever boom They hoped to drop would surely have been dropped by now—and, even if They had, it would have made no difference whatsoever, and neither will whatever other tricks They more than likely have in store for us.
Because the jig is up. Too many people everywhere now see what’s happening right before their eyes, even to themselves and their own families, for any propaganda trick to make them blind again (though many still are blind, and some will never see). Thus what’s happening now, worldwide, recalls what happened in this country with the war in Vietnam, which finally ended not because so many marched against it (back when the left was antiwar). That war finally had to end because the casualty rate was just too high for any further propaganda to deny it. No upbeat blather from the White House or the Pentagon could override the national grief, so many having died, or come home horribly impaired, and still that war ground on for no clear reason—much like now, although there’s no comparison between the two catastrophes in terms of scale; yet “our free press” is not reporting this one, but denying it.
It Only Took a Few Minutes for Anti-Vaxxers to Start Spreading Lisa Marie Presley Conspiracy Theories
Almost immediately, anti-vaxxers baselessly suggested the late singer’s death was caused by the COVID-19 vaccine.
https://www.vice.com/en/article/jgpzg4/lisa-marie-presley-qanon-anti-vaxxers
Video of people collapsing on camera doesn’t show vaccine reactions
CLAIM: A compilation of videos shows people collapsing because they have taken COVID-19 vaccines.
AP’S ASSESSMENT: False. Multiple people featured in the video have clarified that they collapsed or appeared ill for other reasons. COVID-19 vaccines are not causing a large number of people to collapse in routine settings, medical experts say.
Just as there’s no longer any point in fretting whether every single thing we share is totally correct (especially since “our free press” could not care less if it’s correct or not), neither is there any point in trying to refute such criminal disinformation. The only thing to do with it is mark it as more evidence of Their conspiracy to kill us off. Otherwise our duty is to tell the very truth that “our free press” keeps struggling to black out—the truth that people know, and that therefore cannot be killed, no matter what They do to stop us.
Significantly more babies are dying or suffering in hospitals globally
https://rumble.com/v25lq4j-significantly-more-babies-are-dying-or-suffering-in-hospitals-globally.html
Canadians don't seem to be getting the message as apparently they are still getting boosted to an extreme degree (compared to the USA). Is it because Canadians are particularly susceptible to propaganda or is it because our governments are on the sharp point of the spear in that regard?
Great wrapup. Just a comment, from one who was a teen in college during Vietnam: those weekly Life magazine photographs of all who had died that week really did it, I think. Imagine how the mandates would end if some MSM published those who died suddenly each week with their photographs in the same way, stating what killed them. I used to be proud of being a journalist. We would have been fired if we had printed a corporate press release as news reporting. Now I hang my head in shame.