On the first day of his trial, Reinhard Fuellmich vigorously denies embezzlement, claims that his accusers want NOT justice, but to "line their pockets" with the money
On the first day of his trial, Reinhard Fuellmich vigorously denies embezzlement, claims that his accusers want NOT justice, but to "line their pockets" with the money
I have no idea what happened. But whenever anyone stands against the narrative amazingly a series of lawfare events happen. This is the new strategy from the left.
Viviane Fischer always gave me the creeps and I couldn't understand why Fuellmich was working with her. It is obvious to me now that Fischer is a government "Spitzel' with the mission to derail Fuellmich's efforts to expose crimes against humanity.
This hit piece from NDR is clearly slanted against Reiner, undoubtedly intended to discredit the work of the CIC in general.
It omits details such as Reiner’s explanation that he was legitimately concerned that the German government might seize the CIC’s funds as had been occurring with other dissidents, so the committee members decided to transfer them to assets that could not be seized (e.g., gold, property improvements). All was done legally using loan agreements, and my understanding is Reiner has already paid back the funds (whereas Viviane, likely a narcissist with histrionic personality disorder, has not yet repaid her loan as far as I know).
P.S. “Reinhard” should be “Reiner” in the headline :-)
The Ministry of Peace concerns itself with war, the Ministry of Truth with lies, the Ministry of Love with torture and the Ministry of Plenty with starvation.
These contradictions are not accidental, nor do they result from ordinary hypocrisy; they are deliberate exercises in DOUBLETHINK.
Anyone who has ever seen the videos of Reiner Fuellmich knows that he spearheaded an intensive and extensive gathering of experts and information on the 2020 pandemics reportedly due to Covid-19. Vivianne Fischer and anyone else mentioned in this article were only tangentially, or barely involved. Because Fuellmich successfully sued Deutsche Bank and because of his great connection with the german and english-speaking world in exposing the genocidal corruption of the pandemic, they came after him. Intelligence agencies have boasted about infiltrating groups and people's lives to arrest them, as they likely did here. See more of Fuellmich in the darkly amusing film Shots: Eugenics to Pandemics (2022).
he sold the house into which the 700'000 € had been invested for more than a million €.
The notary in charge of the transaction was approached by Mrs Fischer's coworkers, both lawyers, one of them Justus Hoffmann and agreed to wire the money directly to them.
So de facto Mr Füllmich has more than payed back the loan. His lawyer was not allowed to show proof of this transaction which would have shown Mr Füllmich's innocence.
I haven't read your report yet but I wanted to thank you for reporting on R. Ruellmich as I hadn't heard a word about him from anyone else and was worried about his safety.
I watched some of the Corona comittees broadcasts, but the 'sham trial' element seemed pointless to me. I suppose it gave people some hope, but was it hopium? On a related subject, has BLM (international) been pursued for using donation monies privately? How about the covid jab profit monies to doctors and politicians? Much theft in the Covid loan programs as well.
I got sucked into watching many of these videos early on. I now believe they were, willingly or unwillingly, serving the purposes of the the many headed pandemic propaganda process (PPP). Had no idea they were accepting donations. I thought Reiner was like super rich from his VW win. Amplifying this story is like another head of the hydra growing back after being chopped off.
i dunno, i think that if people are donating money to a cause in good faith, then none of it should be used for "private means" for anybody...surely there are trusts etc you could set up to safeguard that money...not invest in a house which would have a private individual's name on the deeds, if that is what happened in this case.
I found Fullmich’s tribunals to be a very important and informative source of information during the early months of Covid 1984 when it was very difficult to put many of the pieces together. At this point no way to know who’s “guilty” or not but this whole business of loans being used for personal use smacks of corruption.
Not sure I understand this at all Mark... was always a little sceptical about them all AFTER FOLLOWING THEM for over 18 months (maybe longer); almost daily and getting nowhere.. but this is the bit above that I could be bothered reading, that confused me....:
""I'm not going to cut myself off and take the money we need to work," he said. He also admitted to using the money privately." .... err what ?.
But then again "charity bosses" are seriously well paid and it s still defined as a non-profit ....
Considering the vast array of experts that Fuellmich interviewed and the evidence that was obtained which illustrated an orchestrated globalist coup, I'm surprised that this showtrial has anyone convinced that Fuellmich was embezzling funds. Just like the Assange, Tate or Brand (and other) sexual assault claims, smearing the opposition is straight out of the standard Machiavellian playbook.
I have no idea what happened. But whenever anyone stands against the narrative amazingly a series of lawfare events happen. This is the new strategy from the left.
Viviane Fischer always gave me the creeps and I couldn't understand why Fuellmich was working with her. It is obvious to me now that Fischer is a government "Spitzel' with the mission to derail Fuellmich's efforts to expose crimes against humanity.
This hit piece from NDR is clearly slanted against Reiner, undoubtedly intended to discredit the work of the CIC in general.
It omits details such as Reiner’s explanation that he was legitimately concerned that the German government might seize the CIC’s funds as had been occurring with other dissidents, so the committee members decided to transfer them to assets that could not be seized (e.g., gold, property improvements). All was done legally using loan agreements, and my understanding is Reiner has already paid back the funds (whereas Viviane, likely a narcissist with histrionic personality disorder, has not yet repaid her loan as far as I know).
P.S. “Reinhard” should be “Reiner” in the headline :-)
The Ministry of Peace concerns itself with war, the Ministry of Truth with lies, the Ministry of Love with torture and the Ministry of Plenty with starvation.
These contradictions are not accidental, nor do they result from ordinary hypocrisy; they are deliberate exercises in DOUBLETHINK.
Anyone who has ever seen the videos of Reiner Fuellmich knows that he spearheaded an intensive and extensive gathering of experts and information on the 2020 pandemics reportedly due to Covid-19. Vivianne Fischer and anyone else mentioned in this article were only tangentially, or barely involved. Because Fuellmich successfully sued Deutsche Bank and because of his great connection with the german and english-speaking world in exposing the genocidal corruption of the pandemic, they came after him. Intelligence agencies have boasted about infiltrating groups and people's lives to arrest them, as they likely did here. See more of Fuellmich in the darkly amusing film Shots: Eugenics to Pandemics (2022).
This report sadly seems strongly biased.
According to Reiner Füllmich's lawyers
he sold the house into which the 700'000 € had been invested for more than a million €.
The notary in charge of the transaction was approached by Mrs Fischer's coworkers, both lawyers, one of them Justus Hoffmann and agreed to wire the money directly to them.
So de facto Mr Füllmich has more than payed back the loan. His lawyer was not allowed to show proof of this transaction which would have shown Mr Füllmich's innocence.
I stand by Reiner Feullmich. Ive followed him frim the beginning. If anyone was fishy it was Vivienne.
I haven't read your report yet but I wanted to thank you for reporting on R. Ruellmich as I hadn't heard a word about him from anyone else and was worried about his safety.
I watched some of the Corona comittees broadcasts, but the 'sham trial' element seemed pointless to me. I suppose it gave people some hope, but was it hopium? On a related subject, has BLM (international) been pursued for using donation monies privately? How about the covid jab profit monies to doctors and politicians? Much theft in the Covid loan programs as well.
https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/justice-department/biggest-fraud-generation-looting-covid-relief-program-known-ppp-n1279664
BLM
https://www.thedailybeast.com/heres-the-real-takeaway-from-black-lives-matters-sketchy-finances
https://nymag.com/intelligencer/2022/01/black-lives-matter-finances.html
I got sucked into watching many of these videos early on. I now believe they were, willingly or unwillingly, serving the purposes of the the many headed pandemic propaganda process (PPP). Had no idea they were accepting donations. I thought Reiner was like super rich from his VW win. Amplifying this story is like another head of the hydra growing back after being chopped off.
i dunno, i think that if people are donating money to a cause in good faith, then none of it should be used for "private means" for anybody...surely there are trusts etc you could set up to safeguard that money...not invest in a house which would have a private individual's name on the deeds, if that is what happened in this case.
I found Fullmich’s tribunals to be a very important and informative source of information during the early months of Covid 1984 when it was very difficult to put many of the pieces together. At this point no way to know who’s “guilty” or not but this whole business of loans being used for personal use smacks of corruption.
Very true, that Wolfgang Wodarg introduced Viviane to Reiner. I am also puzzled by his s role in all of this.
We live in the era of show trials. Democracy has gone. If you stick your head up this is what they do.
Not sure I understand this at all Mark... was always a little sceptical about them all AFTER FOLLOWING THEM for over 18 months (maybe longer); almost daily and getting nowhere.. but this is the bit above that I could be bothered reading, that confused me....:
""I'm not going to cut myself off and take the money we need to work," he said. He also admitted to using the money privately." .... err what ?.
But then again "charity bosses" are seriously well paid and it s still defined as a non-profit ....
Considering the vast array of experts that Fuellmich interviewed and the evidence that was obtained which illustrated an orchestrated globalist coup, I'm surprised that this showtrial has anyone convinced that Fuellmich was embezzling funds. Just like the Assange, Tate or Brand (and other) sexual assault claims, smearing the opposition is straight out of the standard Machiavellian playbook.