My case is ironclad. In order to dismiss it, a lower court has set a precedent that poses a grave threat to academic freedom and free speech in the United States
Academia is as corrupt as every other institution, not to mention lives in a bubble of all their own.
What a stressful, expensive, bunch of garbage. I am so sorry you are having to go through this. I am hoping for a positive outcome, kudos for taking on the fight, sending up prayers. I am grateful to those that have been supportive.
I spent many years on university campuses and loved being around students, vocabulary and ideas but yes upon leaving one university job among literature students, I did flounder looking back, “So what did the author of Cinderella really mean?”!!! Thinking of how twisted my own brain was getting, so many paper titles that didn’t seem to say that much…..So much analysis, and the real world coming up soon for them! Were they ready? Now we know…..
College has become a joke. Just recently where I live they changed the law that people no longer need a college degree to have a state affiliated job. It will be interesting to see how that turns out.
I lived and worked in a university town for 30 years. The university people were always self-absorbed, thought they knew best, looked down on the rest of us, and really couldn't think outside of being on campus. Intellectuals are also very boring stuffy people.
I once did a cold call w/a professor at the University of Florida, we talked for over three hours. I met him a few months later at a conference and amongst his fellow colleagues I was dirt under his feet. He was a snob, not the same man I had spoken with on the phone. They even had to have their own little room to drink and eat because they didn't want to be w/the rest of us. I will never forget that.
Yes true… that is sad….he could have welcomed and introduced you, which would have impressed you the rest of your life, and now look how he is mentioned…..LOL. ~~~recently using the skin color as qualifier for any challenge is bizarre… it occurred to me this week that maybe we should agree that probably everyone’s brain is beige-pink, and just list that.~~~Yes, .though it was years ago, it had more then to do with the up-in-the-air intellectuality! of those days than the airless reasoning of today. Now, educated to the max, but Total ignorance regarding economics, carbon dioxide, mandating tech control of whether solar panels? in places where there is hardly any sun, or energy fans, which freeze in winter~~~Anyway. fact is, that was the best job, the courtesies and affirmations I received from faculty and coworkers I will always treasure. We differed in our outlook but they were not puffy about it. I might be pained by someone’s grammar, but they are real caring, and skilled when there is a construction or plumbing problem. I am grateful ;-)….everyone has their talents to share…. Amen and amen
For a more detailled scientific take on the LENR science for which I am being targeted, I would actually refer you to my colleague's blog, where there is spectography, calorimetry & datasheets, as well as live science videos of experimental LENR reactors @ remoteview.substack.com
I am sending this to all other substack writers I can muster, because I fear for my safety and my family.
I can't go there. But I only recently realized that my colleagues did all their planning, and collaborated on that letter, under lockdown, which surely made them even more irrational. An odd phenomenon, the disembodied posse.
The real Desmet is in his book. There, one can discern the structure of his arguments and if one pays attention, one can understand what he's really saying. A number of writers have pointed this out, including Breggin. Many who've read the book have warned of his true narrative.
My opinion is that Desmet's work is insidious in that he leads people to believe he says one thing but he's really saying another. Many things he says do ring true-- for example, yes there were manipulators-- but what so many miss is that within the overall context, his main theme is: "no conspiracy." It's doublespeak. Be very careful. These times require us all to be on our toes.
The real fight isn't against the stupid people who fall for mass formation because of-- as Desmet says-- their propensity for mechanistic thinking. It's really an absurd thesis if we think about it-- part of the program to destroy reason and logic and substitute narrative? The real fight is against the censorship and propaganda. Desmet deflects from the real fight.
The censorship and propaganda increase the odds of mass formation/mass hysteria. The fascists help it along. Yes, without that they likely would never succeed. The point is, they aid and abet and we end up with hysteria unlike the world has ever seen.
For a more detailled scientific take on the LENR science for which I am being targeted, I would actually refer you to my colleague's blog, where there is spectography, calorimetry & datasheets, as well as live science videos of experimental LENR reactors @ remoteview.substack.com
I am sending this to all other substack writers I can muster, because I fear for my safety and my family.
how magnanimous, and compassionate -- you keep teaching in your responses, as in the interviews, every one worth revisiting ( until the interviews we hope are to come, along with apologies, after a just decision. the minimum of what you deserve )
The behavior of your colleagues unfortunately confirms every stereotype of today’s “elite” academics as being the odious, boorish idiots the rest of us see them as.
You can't make this stuff up. You're allowed to teach there, but not teach propaganda, which you know better than anyone, but then this whole situation, which is about the the biggest propaganda campaign ever, everyone being forced to wear medical masks to instill fear and loathing, is proving that they themselves are big purveyors of propaganda.
For a more detailled scientific take on the LENR science for which I am being targeted, I would actually refer you to my colleague's blog, where there is spectography, calorimetry & datasheets, as well as live science videos of experimental LENR reactors @ remoteview.substack.com
I am sending this to all other substack writers I can muster, because I fear for my safety and my family.
Thanks for the summary Mark, and welcome to the "liege lord {legal{ system" which is nothing more than a commercial endeavor primarily designed to protect the liege lords. While old "common law" was merged with equity law in 1938 under the FDR regime, accessing a common law court is still possible. However, you have to understand who you are, which is rare in today's world.
In the liege lord system you are a; person, resident, citizen, plaintiff, defendant, affiant, litigant, petitioner, etc. etc. These are all dead, fictional "legal" entities that have no basis in reality. As such, judges can rule however their benefactors wish with little to no ramifications.
Under ACTUAL law, you STAND as a man, nothing more, nothing less. And as a man STANDING on the LAND, you have the RIGHT to access the LAW OF THE LAND and be compensated by any man or woman that has caused you wrong, harm or injury. And here's the best part, the judge in such a proceeding is nothing more than a referee, his/her "opinion" matters not as you get to assemble a jury of your peers to decide on BOTH the "law" and the "Facts" of your case.
The downside, you have to learn what you're doing and you can't hire an "attorney" (one who takes from one to give to another) as they have no standing or basis in law as they have only been trained to operate within the liege lord system to "Re-Present" the man (you) as the fictional legal entity (Strawman - person, defendant, citizen, affiant, etc.). The simpler your lawsuit the better. Simple lawful words like harm, property, trespass, defamation, etc. are all that's needed. And key to your very simple case is that you sue men and women only, not fictional entities like "professors", "guilds", "organizations", etc. You sue John Smith, sometimes ACTING as blah blah blah, Frank Jones, sometimes ACTING as judge in the lower court, etc. etc.
You "appear" in court "Sui Juris" as the man, Mark Crispin Miller, not "Pro Se" which is nonsense legalese, in a "Court of Record" in front of a jury of your peers. If you know learn the ropes, the judge can only sit back and watch the proceedings. The judge can't "give instructions" or "throw out evidence" or disqualify witnesses, or any of this other LEGAL garbage. You present your case with whatever you want and your opponents present whatever they want. The jury of peers sorts out the final outcome. Clean, simple and as things should be.
But you'd have to learn the ropes, something an attorney can't help you with. Should you be interested I can share some information to help you get off the ground. I do think your case is important on multiple grounds - freedom, medical malfeasance, academic fraud, legal fraud and a whole host of other arenas. It will take some serious learning and research on your part before you could proceed as the legal system is designed to trip you up at every turn. If you don't understand what they're doing, you'll get sucked into it and be once again unlawfully converted back into a pawn on the legal chessboard instead of the man with rights that you truly are.
100%, A+ you go to the head of the class! Otherwise you CONSENT to their system and UNDERSTAND their rules, you STAND UNDER them, that's why when police pull you over and ask you if you UNDERSTAND you must NEVER say yes. Everything Mika says here imo is absolutely true and I hope you will think about this, Mark.
Stasi America style. Best to you in your stand for sanity and stand for free speech and thought. Quickly becoming Woke New World Order's most hated state, individual liberty, taken up by the ordinary and the powerless for a taste of glory.
Have been with you since Day 1 of this hell. I'm stunned to find out here about Abby Martin's non-support. I wonder why? Was there any communication between you? Did she actually agree with "them," or was she possibly scared (underneath that combative exterior) to take a stand on this "controversial" covid-related issue? Do I have to "cancel" her, too?
Well, I wouldn't cancel her; but I guess she went Covidian. She's been unwell, in a way that points to "vaccination." Very sad. We'd been good friends.
That is sad to hear. My cursory impression from brief bits is that there's more of a chance Robbie Martin, her brother I think, didn't go Covidian. But don't know.
I was a subscriber to their podcast (and Patreon supporter) and I quit because of their unwillingness to address the COVID madness and upon my exit told them why. As they went so has most of the “COVID Left”.
This feels like an in-depth eulogy for the death of academia; at least for the liberal arts and critical thought within. These 'colleagues' are a huge pack of cowards destroying the principles many of them probably pretended to represent once upon a time.
You are among many with integrity bearing the brunt of our Americanized version of the Chinese Cultural Revolution. I am among many who appreciate and thank you for fighting fascism.
And I would like to be the first to sign up for your privatized class on propaganda.
Can only empathize from afar and not very well I'm afraid. Hard to fathom the sheer irony of your life's study become weapons of the same mob you'd spent years explaining, exposing and elucidating upon.
But you've broad shoulders for the effort, a keen intellect for this crucial debate and a bravery that tips the scale over fear. I send you continued strength, wisdom and patience. Godspeed, morgan
For a more detailled scientific take on the LENR science for which I am being targeted, I would actually refer you to my colleague's blog, where there is spectography, calorimetry & datasheets, as well as live science videos of experimental LENR reactors @ remoteview.substack.com
I am sending this to all other substack writers I can muster, because I fear for my safety and my family.
MCM, were you aware several of their beloved mask studies were retracted with neither a peep nor an apology?:
1) To wear or not to wear? Adherence to face mask use during the COVID-19 and Spanish influenza pandemics, 11/12/2020, Early Human Development -- RETRACTED
Quote: "The way that anti-maskers chafe at the mask requirement evokes a time when people were advised to wear a mask during the 1918 pandemic. As the Spanish flu swept through the world causing global devastation in 1918 and 1919, face masks became ubiquitous to help in preventing the spread of disease. A century apart, medical authorities urged and urge the wearing of masks to help slow the spread of disease. Nonetheless, people were and remain resistant to this simple and common sense advice." --- RETRACTED
2) Introduction of mandatory mask policy was associated with significantly reduced COVID-19 cases in a major metropolitan city, 7/21/2021, PLoS One --- RETRACTED
3) Decrease in Hospitalizations for COVID-19 after Mask Mandates in 1083 U.S. Counties, 10/23/2020, medRxiv --- RETRACTED
Retraction Watch has roughly 350 Covid papers that were retracted. So a good chunk (perhaps half) of what the legacy media was reporting at the has been retracted, with no acknowledgment. I would love to do a study on how many news stories relied on retracted papers.
Anyway, as we all know, the journals are heavily biased toward industry (a laughable understatement). So any time an anti-narrative study is submitted, the merchants of doubt (paid academic mercenaries) immediately pounce. That's for the very small percent of critical papers that even make it that far. So when a pro-narrative paper gets retracted, it's a big deal, there were likely huge flaws.
The left really is like the Energizer Bunny. They never meet an obstacle (such as being complete proven wrong) that stops... they merely regroup and start on another front(s).
This is ultimately not about "the left." They were the shock troops harassing me, but (I believe, and can make a solid case) on behalf of NYU the corporation. Check out the who's on NYU's board of trustees. My colleagues were really serving them, but without knowing it.
Thank you for pointing this out. I remember your interview with Catherine Austin Fitts (Solari, May 2021), in which she pointed out the corporate/globalist interests at the helm of NYU!
Good luck, Mark. Unfortunately, I don't share your confidence in success. Being in the right has rarely mattered in the courts and no less so than in the last few years counter narrative. IMO, the legal system needs tearing down with every other ignorant, corrupt state agency. The world would be a much better, safer place without them.
The depth of the corruption and tyranny that is coming to light in this case is without precedent in this nation's history. The fact that there are not angry mobs with pitchforks storming Washington DC speaks to a frightening degree of something -- apathy, ignorance, suppression of the news, lack of understanding -- that reveals how sick our society is. This case needs to lead to a powerful reckoning for all the government and private actors involved, or we we are lost.
It seems that a major fight might be emerging within the legal system, with some judges saying, no, that's not what America is about. Other judges have succumbed to the propaganda. But maybe the ones pushing back will awaken the others to the real defense of their country.
Precedent must still hold a place somewhere in the judicial system where review of that is surely going on. But they have to put their big girl or boy pants on. Soon.
For a more detailled scientific take on the LENR science for which I am being targeted, I would actually refer you to my colleague's blog, where there is spectography, calorimetry & datasheets, as well as live science videos of experimental LENR reactors @ remoteview.substack.com
I am sending this to all other substack writers I can muster, because I fear for my safety and my family.
As ever, all the best of luck for the outcome you desire and deserve.
More and more young people in Canada and the US are turning to learning the trades rather than get an expensive and often useless university degree. I remember as a kid growing up in NYC there were so many stories of guys with college degrees in English Lit who were driving cabs for a living. A lot of good it did even then. Woo bad you can't have some time to go and learn whatever interests you without fees and tests. When I wen to Brandeis U (77-81) my professors were all excellent teachers and interesting people. The classes were small and you really go to know them. Unlike Ivy League schools where grad students teach the undergrads and the prof shows up once in a while.
I hope Mark that you have taught some great kids over the years, I hope it was worth it.
.
Last week CBS aired a couple of Grammy related concerts, one for the Beach Boys and one for Paul Simon.
My stepson who is in his early 40s dropped by, and I mentioned them.
He said the only Paul Simon music he knew was the Graceland album.
I said you know he's been making music since 1965 or so and then I stopped--from the look on his face, I could see he was completely uninterested. He is of course jabbed up too.
I often think his deliberate ignorance is out of spite against anyone who knows more than he does.
Academia is as corrupt as every other institution, not to mention lives in a bubble of all their own.
What a stressful, expensive, bunch of garbage. I am so sorry you are having to go through this. I am hoping for a positive outcome, kudos for taking on the fight, sending up prayers. I am grateful to those that have been supportive.
I spent many years on university campuses and loved being around students, vocabulary and ideas but yes upon leaving one university job among literature students, I did flounder looking back, “So what did the author of Cinderella really mean?”!!! Thinking of how twisted my own brain was getting, so many paper titles that didn’t seem to say that much…..So much analysis, and the real world coming up soon for them! Were they ready? Now we know…..
College has become a joke. Just recently where I live they changed the law that people no longer need a college degree to have a state affiliated job. It will be interesting to see how that turns out.
I lived and worked in a university town for 30 years. The university people were always self-absorbed, thought they knew best, looked down on the rest of us, and really couldn't think outside of being on campus. Intellectuals are also very boring stuffy people.
I once did a cold call w/a professor at the University of Florida, we talked for over three hours. I met him a few months later at a conference and amongst his fellow colleagues I was dirt under his feet. He was a snob, not the same man I had spoken with on the phone. They even had to have their own little room to drink and eat because they didn't want to be w/the rest of us. I will never forget that.
Yes true… that is sad….he could have welcomed and introduced you, which would have impressed you the rest of your life, and now look how he is mentioned…..LOL. ~~~recently using the skin color as qualifier for any challenge is bizarre… it occurred to me this week that maybe we should agree that probably everyone’s brain is beige-pink, and just list that.~~~Yes, .though it was years ago, it had more then to do with the up-in-the-air intellectuality! of those days than the airless reasoning of today. Now, educated to the max, but Total ignorance regarding economics, carbon dioxide, mandating tech control of whether solar panels? in places where there is hardly any sun, or energy fans, which freeze in winter~~~Anyway. fact is, that was the best job, the courtesies and affirmations I received from faculty and coworkers I will always treasure. We differed in our outlook but they were not puffy about it. I might be pained by someone’s grammar, but they are real caring, and skilled when there is a construction or plumbing problem. I am grateful ;-)….everyone has their talents to share…. Amen and amen
Energy science research can get you into trouble....
Please read, i feel endangered.:
https://arcanus.substack.com/p/the-suppression-of-energy-science
https://arcanus.substack.com/p/the-christ-psyop
For a more detailled scientific take on the LENR science for which I am being targeted, I would actually refer you to my colleague's blog, where there is spectography, calorimetry & datasheets, as well as live science videos of experimental LENR reactors @ remoteview.substack.com
I am sending this to all other substack writers I can muster, because I fear for my safety and my family.
Best of luck to you. Your fight for the truth is much appreciated.
If it's any consolation, most of your tormentors are fully vaccinated and boosted.
I can't go there. But I only recently realized that my colleagues did all their planning, and collaborated on that letter, under lockdown, which surely made them even more irrational. An odd phenomenon, the disembodied posse.
The greater the irrationality, the more Matias Desmet's work makes sense.
For God's sake, please read his book carefully. It makes no sense at all.
I watched his long interview with Tucker C. It made perfect sense. Desmet has done his homework.
The real Desmet is in his book. There, one can discern the structure of his arguments and if one pays attention, one can understand what he's really saying. A number of writers have pointed this out, including Breggin. Many who've read the book have warned of his true narrative.
My opinion is that Desmet's work is insidious in that he leads people to believe he says one thing but he's really saying another. Many things he says do ring true-- for example, yes there were manipulators-- but what so many miss is that within the overall context, his main theme is: "no conspiracy." It's doublespeak. Be very careful. These times require us all to be on our toes.
The real fight isn't against the stupid people who fall for mass formation because of-- as Desmet says-- their propensity for mechanistic thinking. It's really an absurd thesis if we think about it-- part of the program to destroy reason and logic and substitute narrative? The real fight is against the censorship and propaganda. Desmet deflects from the real fight.
The censorship and propaganda increase the odds of mass formation/mass hysteria. The fascists help it along. Yes, without that they likely would never succeed. The point is, they aid and abet and we end up with hysteria unlike the world has ever seen.
Energy science research can get you into trouble....
Please read, i feel endangered.:
https://arcanus.substack.com/p/the-suppression-of-energy-science
https://arcanus.substack.com/p/the-christ-psyop
For a more detailled scientific take on the LENR science for which I am being targeted, I would actually refer you to my colleague's blog, where there is spectography, calorimetry & datasheets, as well as live science videos of experimental LENR reactors @ remoteview.substack.com
I am sending this to all other substack writers I can muster, because I fear for my safety and my family.
how magnanimous, and compassionate -- you keep teaching in your responses, as in the interviews, every one worth revisiting ( until the interviews we hope are to come, along with apologies, after a just decision. the minimum of what you deserve )
Interesting notion. Interesting observation. The disembodied posse.
Thank you for unrelentingly fighting the good fight. I wish you the best of luck.
The behavior of your colleagues unfortunately confirms every stereotype of today’s “elite” academics as being the odious, boorish idiots the rest of us see them as.
“Cretins with credentials” is what I have called them well before Covid.
You can't make this stuff up. You're allowed to teach there, but not teach propaganda, which you know better than anyone, but then this whole situation, which is about the the biggest propaganda campaign ever, everyone being forced to wear medical masks to instill fear and loathing, is proving that they themselves are big purveyors of propaganda.
Exactly! The propaganda narrative that can't be countered is the real danger and the real enemy.
Energy science research can get you into trouble....
Please read, i feel endangered.:
https://arcanus.substack.com/p/the-suppression-of-energy-science
https://arcanus.substack.com/p/the-christ-psyop
For a more detailled scientific take on the LENR science for which I am being targeted, I would actually refer you to my colleague's blog, where there is spectography, calorimetry & datasheets, as well as live science videos of experimental LENR reactors @ remoteview.substack.com
I am sending this to all other substack writers I can muster, because I fear for my safety and my family.
I have been following your story through the last three years and just know the pendulum swings, and you have momentum.
Thanks for the summary Mark, and welcome to the "liege lord {legal{ system" which is nothing more than a commercial endeavor primarily designed to protect the liege lords. While old "common law" was merged with equity law in 1938 under the FDR regime, accessing a common law court is still possible. However, you have to understand who you are, which is rare in today's world.
In the liege lord system you are a; person, resident, citizen, plaintiff, defendant, affiant, litigant, petitioner, etc. etc. These are all dead, fictional "legal" entities that have no basis in reality. As such, judges can rule however their benefactors wish with little to no ramifications.
Under ACTUAL law, you STAND as a man, nothing more, nothing less. And as a man STANDING on the LAND, you have the RIGHT to access the LAW OF THE LAND and be compensated by any man or woman that has caused you wrong, harm or injury. And here's the best part, the judge in such a proceeding is nothing more than a referee, his/her "opinion" matters not as you get to assemble a jury of your peers to decide on BOTH the "law" and the "Facts" of your case.
The downside, you have to learn what you're doing and you can't hire an "attorney" (one who takes from one to give to another) as they have no standing or basis in law as they have only been trained to operate within the liege lord system to "Re-Present" the man (you) as the fictional legal entity (Strawman - person, defendant, citizen, affiant, etc.). The simpler your lawsuit the better. Simple lawful words like harm, property, trespass, defamation, etc. are all that's needed. And key to your very simple case is that you sue men and women only, not fictional entities like "professors", "guilds", "organizations", etc. You sue John Smith, sometimes ACTING as blah blah blah, Frank Jones, sometimes ACTING as judge in the lower court, etc. etc.
You "appear" in court "Sui Juris" as the man, Mark Crispin Miller, not "Pro Se" which is nonsense legalese, in a "Court of Record" in front of a jury of your peers. If you know learn the ropes, the judge can only sit back and watch the proceedings. The judge can't "give instructions" or "throw out evidence" or disqualify witnesses, or any of this other LEGAL garbage. You present your case with whatever you want and your opponents present whatever they want. The jury of peers sorts out the final outcome. Clean, simple and as things should be.
But you'd have to learn the ropes, something an attorney can't help you with. Should you be interested I can share some information to help you get off the ground. I do think your case is important on multiple grounds - freedom, medical malfeasance, academic fraud, legal fraud and a whole host of other arenas. It will take some serious learning and research on your part before you could proceed as the legal system is designed to trip you up at every turn. If you don't understand what they're doing, you'll get sucked into it and be once again unlawfully converted back into a pawn on the legal chessboard instead of the man with rights that you truly are.
Good luck on whatever you choose to do!
Mark: May your legal enemies make many critical mistakes. May they be confounded, disorganized, and brought down - hard.
100%, A+ you go to the head of the class! Otherwise you CONSENT to their system and UNDERSTAND their rules, you STAND UNDER them, that's why when police pull you over and ask you if you UNDERSTAND you must NEVER say yes. Everything Mika says here imo is absolutely true and I hope you will think about this, Mark.
Yes! This.
Mark isn't just sui juris, he's sui generis! Who else is standing up against the groves of academe (h/t Mary McCarthy)? He. Will. Prevail.
All the best to you, Mark. Praying that you have the best outcome you could hope for. You are an inspiration to so many of us. 🙏
Stasi America style. Best to you in your stand for sanity and stand for free speech and thought. Quickly becoming Woke New World Order's most hated state, individual liberty, taken up by the ordinary and the powerless for a taste of glory.
Have been with you since Day 1 of this hell. I'm stunned to find out here about Abby Martin's non-support. I wonder why? Was there any communication between you? Did she actually agree with "them," or was she possibly scared (underneath that combative exterior) to take a stand on this "controversial" covid-related issue? Do I have to "cancel" her, too?
Well, I wouldn't cancel her; but I guess she went Covidian. She's been unwell, in a way that points to "vaccination." Very sad. We'd been good friends.
That is sad to hear. My cursory impression from brief bits is that there's more of a chance Robbie Martin, her brother I think, didn't go Covidian. But don't know.
I was a subscriber to their podcast (and Patreon supporter) and I quit because of their unwillingness to address the COVID madness and upon my exit told them why. As they went so has most of the “COVID Left”.
This feels like an in-depth eulogy for the death of academia; at least for the liberal arts and critical thought within. These 'colleagues' are a huge pack of cowards destroying the principles many of them probably pretended to represent once upon a time.
You are among many with integrity bearing the brunt of our Americanized version of the Chinese Cultural Revolution. I am among many who appreciate and thank you for fighting fascism.
And I would like to be the first to sign up for your privatized class on propaganda.
Wow Mark,
Can only empathize from afar and not very well I'm afraid. Hard to fathom the sheer irony of your life's study become weapons of the same mob you'd spent years explaining, exposing and elucidating upon.
But you've broad shoulders for the effort, a keen intellect for this crucial debate and a bravery that tips the scale over fear. I send you continued strength, wisdom and patience. Godspeed, morgan
Energy science research can get you into trouble....
Please read, i feel endangered.:
https://arcanus.substack.com/p/the-suppression-of-energy-science
https://arcanus.substack.com/p/the-christ-psyop
For a more detailled scientific take on the LENR science for which I am being targeted, I would actually refer you to my colleague's blog, where there is spectography, calorimetry & datasheets, as well as live science videos of experimental LENR reactors @ remoteview.substack.com
I am sending this to all other substack writers I can muster, because I fear for my safety and my family.
MCM, were you aware several of their beloved mask studies were retracted with neither a peep nor an apology?:
1) To wear or not to wear? Adherence to face mask use during the COVID-19 and Spanish influenza pandemics, 11/12/2020, Early Human Development -- RETRACTED
Quote: "The way that anti-maskers chafe at the mask requirement evokes a time when people were advised to wear a mask during the 1918 pandemic. As the Spanish flu swept through the world causing global devastation in 1918 and 1919, face masks became ubiquitous to help in preventing the spread of disease. A century apart, medical authorities urged and urge the wearing of masks to help slow the spread of disease. Nonetheless, people were and remain resistant to this simple and common sense advice." --- RETRACTED
2) Introduction of mandatory mask policy was associated with significantly reduced COVID-19 cases in a major metropolitan city, 7/21/2021, PLoS One --- RETRACTED
3) Decrease in Hospitalizations for COVID-19 after Mask Mandates in 1083 U.S. Counties, 10/23/2020, medRxiv --- RETRACTED
Retraction Watch has roughly 350 Covid papers that were retracted. So a good chunk (perhaps half) of what the legacy media was reporting at the has been retracted, with no acknowledgment. I would love to do a study on how many news stories relied on retracted papers.
Anyway, as we all know, the journals are heavily biased toward industry (a laughable understatement). So any time an anti-narrative study is submitted, the merchants of doubt (paid academic mercenaries) immediately pounce. That's for the very small percent of critical papers that even make it that far. So when a pro-narrative paper gets retracted, it's a big deal, there were likely huge flaws.
https://retractionwatch.com/retracted-coronavirus-covid-19-papers/
Yes. They were crap studies, written up and spread around for propaganda purposes.
>>>with no acknowledgment<<<
The left really is like the Energizer Bunny. They never meet an obstacle (such as being complete proven wrong) that stops... they merely regroup and start on another front(s).
This is ultimately not about "the left." They were the shock troops harassing me, but (I believe, and can make a solid case) on behalf of NYU the corporation. Check out the who's on NYU's board of trustees. My colleagues were really serving them, but without knowing it.
Thank you for pointing this out. I remember your interview with Catherine Austin Fitts (Solari, May 2021), in which she pointed out the corporate/globalist interests at the helm of NYU!
You are correct about the left being coopted...
Good luck, Mark. Unfortunately, I don't share your confidence in success. Being in the right has rarely mattered in the courts and no less so than in the last few years counter narrative. IMO, the legal system needs tearing down with every other ignorant, corrupt state agency. The world would be a much better, safer place without them.
Where do you see my confidence in success?
In times of trouble like this (and for future) - a good time to read and pray Ps 91.
Also - I am praying this for you: Let our eyes see the defeat of our adversaries; let our ears hear the rout of our wicked foes.
Yes - that 2nd line is from Ps 92.
Love the sound of those imprecatory psalms.
Yet, in Missouri v Biden, we do seem to be making some headway. https://brownstone.org/articles/censors-are-exposed-major-update-to-missouri-v-biden/
The depth of the corruption and tyranny that is coming to light in this case is without precedent in this nation's history. The fact that there are not angry mobs with pitchforks storming Washington DC speaks to a frightening degree of something -- apathy, ignorance, suppression of the news, lack of understanding -- that reveals how sick our society is. This case needs to lead to a powerful reckoning for all the government and private actors involved, or we we are lost.
I read that in some hope.
It seems that a major fight might be emerging within the legal system, with some judges saying, no, that's not what America is about. Other judges have succumbed to the propaganda. But maybe the ones pushing back will awaken the others to the real defense of their country.
Precedent must still hold a place somewhere in the judicial system where review of that is surely going on. But they have to put their big girl or boy pants on. Soon.
Energy science research can get you into trouble....
Please read, i feel endangered.:
https://arcanus.substack.com/p/the-suppression-of-energy-science
https://arcanus.substack.com/p/the-christ-psyop
For a more detailled scientific take on the LENR science for which I am being targeted, I would actually refer you to my colleague's blog, where there is spectography, calorimetry & datasheets, as well as live science videos of experimental LENR reactors @ remoteview.substack.com
I am sending this to all other substack writers I can muster, because I fear for my safety and my family.
As ever, all the best of luck for the outcome you desire and deserve.
More and more young people in Canada and the US are turning to learning the trades rather than get an expensive and often useless university degree. I remember as a kid growing up in NYC there were so many stories of guys with college degrees in English Lit who were driving cabs for a living. A lot of good it did even then. Woo bad you can't have some time to go and learn whatever interests you without fees and tests. When I wen to Brandeis U (77-81) my professors were all excellent teachers and interesting people. The classes were small and you really go to know them. Unlike Ivy League schools where grad students teach the undergrads and the prof shows up once in a while.
I hope Mark that you have taught some great kids over the years, I hope it was worth it.
.
Last week CBS aired a couple of Grammy related concerts, one for the Beach Boys and one for Paul Simon.
My stepson who is in his early 40s dropped by, and I mentioned them.
He said the only Paul Simon music he knew was the Graceland album.
I said you know he's been making music since 1965 or so and then I stopped--from the look on his face, I could see he was completely uninterested. He is of course jabbed up too.
I often think his deliberate ignorance is out of spite against anyone who knows more than he does.
Cutting off your nose to spite your face.