To be fair, it is actually equal to zero only in one of these demos, be it "my body my choice", "save the planet from climate change/humans/whatever" or "anti-fascist/racist/BLM" demos because those are orchestrated to attract and manipulate brainwashed fools. In normal life I still meet quite a lot of people who aren't totally brainwashed. Admittedly there's a bit of preselection going on there, as one tends to recognise likeminded, before actively engaging in seditious talk, but in my area it's certainly far from close to zero. If I were forced to guess, I'd say that at least one in 4 aren't brainwashed morons, the same proportion are brainwashed morons and the rest, ie. about half just go the way the wind blows.
I shouldn't laugh at that, but I did. Because these are the bottom of the barrel and their excessively high self-regard (brought to them by the corporatocracy) means they'll be the last to know.
Absolutely "spot on" comment. Maybe these are the useless eaters along with the Elite Psychopaths to be eradicated? Gene lines removed permanently. Gates Snr a former President of PLanned Parenthood has shown us that is to be serisuly considered.
I don't like to think of anyone on our horizontal level being a useless eater. They're just myopic and deluded and moronic people who can't see how they've been manipulated but I'm sure given the right environment they'd revert back to something less idiotic :)
True, but that's not how natural selection works. The lion doesn't say "hey, this antelope that's running towards me instead of away is obviously misguided, I'm sure that given the right environment, like a zoo with free pet psychology care say, it'd become top fit. So I should give it a chance!". Unless the lion is a long term thinker and figures that if he lets it breed, then all of it's offspring will become easier to catch as well. Genius lion! Maybe that's what's going on here, but it doesn't look like it. It sure looks like the lions are going for the straight kill of the unfit on this one, and honestly, who can argue with that?
Well, my comment's a bit tongue in cheek. If one wanted to discuss it seriously then one would have to back up a few steps and discuss whether humans eliminating other humans, through decidedly unnatural and devious means, constitutes "natural selection" or not. The "might is right" crowd which appears to be in power atm (and let's face it, historically always has been in power, with few and rather brief exceptions) would privately say "Yes!", without a shadow of a doubt, while publicly claiming to be all for "human rights and love thy neighbour etc.". The rest of us tend to say "well hang on, what about civilisation and society etc. Aren't we supposed to be above the law of the jungle thanks to all that?". It's a pretty lengthy debate once one starts, but the thing is, what happens when the antelopes actively want to run towards the lions and become actively aggressive towards anyone trying to dissuade them? For me this takes it to another level, so yes I agree with you that we're not even talking "natural selection" here anymore, because indeed, that's not how natural selection works. Natural selection would be "an antelope born with a defect preventing it from running gets eaten, thus hopefully removing some of the genes with this defect from the gene pool". So indeed, it's not really natural selection, it's kind of worse than that. "Unnatural selection"? Call it what you will, but a selection of some kind is definitely taking place here.
More confirmation that these people derive their beliefs from emotions instead of fundamental principles.
Some were surprised when they realized their position is hypocritical. You can practically see the cognitive dissonance kick in and they just dismiss the contradiction and withdraw from the conversation.
The hypocrisy is mind blowing. Total disconnect. Plus they're completely missing the substance of the internal debate in the Supreme Court on Roe v. Wade. Justice Ginsburg was for the result of Roe v Wade, but not THIS case or how the result was reached. “My idea of how choice should have developed was not a privacy notion, not a doctor’s right notion, but a woman’s right to control her own destiny, to be able to make choices without a Big Brother state telling her what she can and cannot do,” Ginsburg said. Agree or not, you can see her logic in action here. But in a separate interview when asked about bodily self determination as related to selling your own kidney or prostitution..." The question is whether the state can regulate conduct that may be harmful to oneself or others. And I, I think the answer to that is yes, that they can protect you from harming yourself." I'm not sure how Ginsburg herself could reconcile these two positions unless we allow the State to decide what constitutes harm and we're allowed decisions which fall within their determinations. OMG, I find myself a Libertarian.
As I wrote to the ACLU in response to their request for a donation:
—The focus of the organization has shifted. Freedom of assembly and freedom of speech are no longer priorities. The focus is now on identity politics and lunatics like Chase Strangio and his perverse agenda (of healthcare and medical procedures for trans children—if there is such a thing!).
I support feminism. I oppose the transgender agenda. Transgender men are not women. They’re not even transgender. They’re men in women’s clothes.
I’m against “gender-affirming” healthcare for transgender youth. This translates to hormone suppressing drugs and other dangerous therapies for children who have little or no idea about what gender means. They are often manipulated by transgender adults.
I oppose allowing men to participate in women’s sports. It’s a national disgrace that most American collegiate women’s swimming records are now held by a man.
Transgender political actions have caused women’s counseling centers to lose funding and made women feel unsafe in women’s bathrooms. Trans politics are obfuscating what a woman is:
As comedian Rick Gervais observed, "We would never say 'Women don’t have penises’. We didn’t have to.”
I stand with women who say, “My body, my choice.” and with those people unwilling to submit to gene-therapy injections who say the same thing. Why doesn’t the ACLU stand with us? How can the ACLU support mandates? And why are they wasting resources on supporting “children’s right to become transsexuals"?
This situation deserves a serious consideration and analysis. How come activists got so compartmentalized and into militarized antagonizing positions? How can these be bridged once again? Peace activists calling for NATO interventions. Women being canceled. “My body my choice” excluding pregnancies & it’s opposite abortion yes medical choices no...
Imagine the awesome powerful surge to defeat the billionaires’ predator class tyranny possible here!
Someone offered me a life insurance policy today in case i die unexpectedly from a hacksxxxident. From big Harma hacksxxxine. For my loved ones to benefit. Gotta love their language. Straight forward. Send us money, if u die we pay someone else. Thanks.
it was to give women the opportunity to have their innate talents - read individuality recognised and not be defined by their sex. I.e. being totally restricted to a life of marriage and children, children are a shared decision and shared care., which in hte hands of intelligent parents can only benefit the child. Men also were to be benefited by women being able to have a richer life experience and be fulfilled and "allowing" the men to have more choices in their lives too.
Many years ago women's thoughts'/conversations were not taken seriously, and they had to follow and support a mans Career.
But of course we get the idiots like the ones we see in this video who .......
and Yes, Woman's rights were pushed by certain big Corporations.
I know I'm opening up a can o worms here, but MCM, do you really want to compare MSanger (major bigot circa 1920's) to Gates of 2022? I guess you go to Sanger because this video is about idjits thoughts on reproductive freedom?
(Unfort, I can't see the vid, most likely because I refuse to sign up for twister... but from reading comments, I get it.)
Ppl and/or feminists who don’t see that the vaxx/testing/masks/quarantines/mandates are all about body autonomy and sovereignty (and yes, depopulation)but take to the streets only for abortion rights need to do some critical thinking but oops they can’t becuz the brainwashing re “vaxx = safe and effective” runs so deep. And their feelings about Roe v W and women’s abortion rights goes back decades so they try to put it together but their pointy little heads are about to explode from so much cognitive diss.
(hey, excuse me but I’m still stuck on the timing of the “leaked memo” from SCOTUS re Roe v W cuz there’s some big election in NOV, but hey I’m not entitled to say anything about that because I haven’t voted in decades.)
I’ve taken myself off many lists cuz my head spins with the anti-vaxxer religious zealots going on about “baby rights”, never call it FETUS, always call it pro-abortion, not pro-choice while lamenting the mandates for vaxx as against the Bill of Rights. Then the so-called feminist pro-choice sites that hardly mention the whole PLANdemic, the death and destruction, to take away ALL choice of every aspect of life, (even in “men’s wombs”, I bet!) focus on this leaked memo, with protests in street and some wearing masks!!!??? It makes me want to look for a rubber room somewhere.
So it’s 2022 and we’re being distracted by “what is a woman?’ (Why isn’t the question, “What is a man?” because they want to keep their plumbing and have more access to women (in jails, in sports…) and children (it’s called pedophilia) Or how about what is a baby? what is a vaccine? what is a virus? A small group of narcissitic attention seeking sexist Broadway show star wannabe men in skirts and boas are taking their agenda into parties with children. Drag Queen Storytime indeed!
BTW, I’m not a homophobe; I’m a lesbian. Is that relevant to anything here?
Bill Gates, Sr. was on the board of Planned Parenthood, out of the same commitment to eugenics that drove Sanger (as she spelled out in her book The Pivot of Civilization). His commitment—which he shared with his pals, the Rockefellers—had a major impact on his son's worldview.
So these people are, or were, not "bigots," since their project wasn't based on any mere parochial distaste but on a full-blown fanatical devotion to EUGENICS; and so it is appropriate to link them. (I recommend Edwin Black's War Against the Weak, if you want a good book on that movement, whose history is far from over.)
Totally agree with you. Something is seriously wrong with this picture. Everything they do just seems like there brainwashed brain dead STUPID and Karen’s Watch people and really look at them I see vaccines and a empty head
They literally have no idea what body autonomy means. And saving lives clearly. What a fantastic interviewer. People are seriously dumb.
Dumb? These people are baked.
Clearly
great reply
To be fair, it is actually equal to zero only in one of these demos, be it "my body my choice", "save the planet from climate change/humans/whatever" or "anti-fascist/racist/BLM" demos because those are orchestrated to attract and manipulate brainwashed fools. In normal life I still meet quite a lot of people who aren't totally brainwashed. Admittedly there's a bit of preselection going on there, as one tends to recognise likeminded, before actively engaging in seditious talk, but in my area it's certainly far from close to zero. If I were forced to guess, I'd say that at least one in 4 aren't brainwashed morons, the same proportion are brainwashed morons and the rest, ie. about half just go the way the wind blows.
As Clarence Darrow observed,
—I don't believe in God because I don't believe in Mother Goose.
Don't agree with #2 and 4, but three of five is OK.
Same but add 5.
"Religion has existed since the first scoundrel met the first imbecile"
—Voltaire
I shouldn't, but I can't help feeling happy that they're all vaccinated.
I shouldn't laugh at that, but I did. Because these are the bottom of the barrel and their excessively high self-regard (brought to them by the corporatocracy) means they'll be the last to know.
Sue,
Absolutely "spot on" comment. Maybe these are the useless eaters along with the Elite Psychopaths to be eradicated? Gene lines removed permanently. Gates Snr a former President of PLanned Parenthood has shown us that is to be serisuly considered.
I don't like to think of anyone on our horizontal level being a useless eater. They're just myopic and deluded and moronic people who can't see how they've been manipulated but I'm sure given the right environment they'd revert back to something less idiotic :)
True, but that's not how natural selection works. The lion doesn't say "hey, this antelope that's running towards me instead of away is obviously misguided, I'm sure that given the right environment, like a zoo with free pet psychology care say, it'd become top fit. So I should give it a chance!". Unless the lion is a long term thinker and figures that if he lets it breed, then all of it's offspring will become easier to catch as well. Genius lion! Maybe that's what's going on here, but it doesn't look like it. It sure looks like the lions are going for the straight kill of the unfit on this one, and honestly, who can argue with that?
This is all far too reductionist for me. I see where you're coming from but I don't think how you're framing it is how natural selection works either.
Well, my comment's a bit tongue in cheek. If one wanted to discuss it seriously then one would have to back up a few steps and discuss whether humans eliminating other humans, through decidedly unnatural and devious means, constitutes "natural selection" or not. The "might is right" crowd which appears to be in power atm (and let's face it, historically always has been in power, with few and rather brief exceptions) would privately say "Yes!", without a shadow of a doubt, while publicly claiming to be all for "human rights and love thy neighbour etc.". The rest of us tend to say "well hang on, what about civilisation and society etc. Aren't we supposed to be above the law of the jungle thanks to all that?". It's a pretty lengthy debate once one starts, but the thing is, what happens when the antelopes actively want to run towards the lions and become actively aggressive towards anyone trying to dissuade them? For me this takes it to another level, so yes I agree with you that we're not even talking "natural selection" here anymore, because indeed, that's not how natural selection works. Natural selection would be "an antelope born with a defect preventing it from running gets eaten, thus hopefully removing some of the genes with this defect from the gene pool". So indeed, it's not really natural selection, it's kind of worse than that. "Unnatural selection"? Call it what you will, but a selection of some kind is definitely taking place here.
Go watch or read Mary’s Monkeys. Gay people didn’t cause AIDS. AIDS was created in a lab. Otherwise you were spot on
Until you have watched the documentary or read the book I’ll have to refrain from engaging
😊
I wouldn't hold my breath; lots of fake virtue-signaling out there...
Of course, if it is true, occasionally natural selection might take the proper course...
These people make me sick.
More confirmation that these people derive their beliefs from emotions instead of fundamental principles.
Some were surprised when they realized their position is hypocritical. You can practically see the cognitive dissonance kick in and they just dismiss the contradiction and withdraw from the conversation.
Needle rape is good for women and men!
The mind whirs like a top trying to spin in two opposite directions. LOL.
The hypocrisy is mind blowing. Total disconnect. Plus they're completely missing the substance of the internal debate in the Supreme Court on Roe v. Wade. Justice Ginsburg was for the result of Roe v Wade, but not THIS case or how the result was reached. “My idea of how choice should have developed was not a privacy notion, not a doctor’s right notion, but a woman’s right to control her own destiny, to be able to make choices without a Big Brother state telling her what she can and cannot do,” Ginsburg said. Agree or not, you can see her logic in action here. But in a separate interview when asked about bodily self determination as related to selling your own kidney or prostitution..." The question is whether the state can regulate conduct that may be harmful to oneself or others. And I, I think the answer to that is yes, that they can protect you from harming yourself." I'm not sure how Ginsburg herself could reconcile these two positions unless we allow the State to decide what constitutes harm and we're allowed decisions which fall within their determinations. OMG, I find myself a Libertarian.
Logic and reason are white supremacy!
Hey I'm black and I agree!!!!
Civilization, science, philosophy, and literature—and everything else, began in Africa.
Logic and reason are two things all humans should value.
Reducing complex phenomena to slogans is foolish.
Tell me you don’t understand sarcasm without telling me you don’t understand sarcasm.
Sorry, TT.
In this case, I missed it.
As an old lit major I should be better at recognizing irony and sarcasm.
But you must concede, people post some really stupid things.
Lol, it’s getting harder and harder to differentiate!
As I wrote to the ACLU in response to their request for a donation:
—The focus of the organization has shifted. Freedom of assembly and freedom of speech are no longer priorities. The focus is now on identity politics and lunatics like Chase Strangio and his perverse agenda (of healthcare and medical procedures for trans children—if there is such a thing!).
I support feminism. I oppose the transgender agenda. Transgender men are not women. They’re not even transgender. They’re men in women’s clothes.
I’m against “gender-affirming” healthcare for transgender youth. This translates to hormone suppressing drugs and other dangerous therapies for children who have little or no idea about what gender means. They are often manipulated by transgender adults.
I oppose allowing men to participate in women’s sports. It’s a national disgrace that most American collegiate women’s swimming records are now held by a man.
Transgender political actions have caused women’s counseling centers to lose funding and made women feel unsafe in women’s bathrooms. Trans politics are obfuscating what a woman is:
https://medium.com/@s.r.allen/if-transwomen-are-women-what-is-a-woman-d36121bdd926
As comedian Rick Gervais observed, "We would never say 'Women don’t have penises’. We didn’t have to.”
I stand with women who say, “My body, my choice.” and with those people unwilling to submit to gene-therapy injections who say the same thing. Why doesn’t the ACLU stand with us? How can the ACLU support mandates? And why are they wasting resources on supporting “children’s right to become transsexuals"?
This situation deserves a serious consideration and analysis. How come activists got so compartmentalized and into militarized antagonizing positions? How can these be bridged once again? Peace activists calling for NATO interventions. Women being canceled. “My body my choice” excluding pregnancies & it’s opposite abortion yes medical choices no...
Imagine the awesome powerful surge to defeat the billionaires’ predator class tyranny possible here!
Someone offered me a life insurance policy today in case i die unexpectedly from a hacksxxxident. From big Harma hacksxxxine. For my loved ones to benefit. Gotta love their language. Straight forward. Send us money, if u die we pay someone else. Thanks.
They used the words unexpected death
I love how many people audibly exhaled throughout that video when considering their own hypocrisy. 😅
I’ve watched this six times now trying to figure out any logic... now I won’t sleep. I’m not a super smart person but wth is going on?
Wow, the lunacy... Feminism is a mental illness
I wouldn't throw the baby out with the bathwater. But this gaggle of fuckheads is making the original baby into a monster.
Exactly 💯, feminism like most things in life began with good intent, but has become a monster
it was to give women the opportunity to have their innate talents - read individuality recognised and not be defined by their sex. I.e. being totally restricted to a life of marriage and children, children are a shared decision and shared care., which in hte hands of intelligent parents can only benefit the child. Men also were to be benefited by women being able to have a richer life experience and be fulfilled and "allowing" the men to have more choices in their lives too.
Many years ago women's thoughts'/conversations were not taken seriously, and they had to follow and support a mans Career.
But of course we get the idiots like the ones we see in this video who .......
and Yes, Woman's rights were pushed by certain big Corporations.
Exactly 💯
So hard to not hate the fuck out of people. Trying but failing right now. Hypocrites, hypocrites, hippocritz.
I know I'm opening up a can o worms here, but MCM, do you really want to compare MSanger (major bigot circa 1920's) to Gates of 2022? I guess you go to Sanger because this video is about idjits thoughts on reproductive freedom?
(Unfort, I can't see the vid, most likely because I refuse to sign up for twister... but from reading comments, I get it.)
Ppl and/or feminists who don’t see that the vaxx/testing/masks/quarantines/mandates are all about body autonomy and sovereignty (and yes, depopulation)but take to the streets only for abortion rights need to do some critical thinking but oops they can’t becuz the brainwashing re “vaxx = safe and effective” runs so deep. And their feelings about Roe v W and women’s abortion rights goes back decades so they try to put it together but their pointy little heads are about to explode from so much cognitive diss.
(hey, excuse me but I’m still stuck on the timing of the “leaked memo” from SCOTUS re Roe v W cuz there’s some big election in NOV, but hey I’m not entitled to say anything about that because I haven’t voted in decades.)
I’ve taken myself off many lists cuz my head spins with the anti-vaxxer religious zealots going on about “baby rights”, never call it FETUS, always call it pro-abortion, not pro-choice while lamenting the mandates for vaxx as against the Bill of Rights. Then the so-called feminist pro-choice sites that hardly mention the whole PLANdemic, the death and destruction, to take away ALL choice of every aspect of life, (even in “men’s wombs”, I bet!) focus on this leaked memo, with protests in street and some wearing masks!!!??? It makes me want to look for a rubber room somewhere.
So it’s 2022 and we’re being distracted by “what is a woman?’ (Why isn’t the question, “What is a man?” because they want to keep their plumbing and have more access to women (in jails, in sports…) and children (it’s called pedophilia) Or how about what is a baby? what is a vaccine? what is a virus? A small group of narcissitic attention seeking sexist Broadway show star wannabe men in skirts and boas are taking their agenda into parties with children. Drag Queen Storytime indeed!
BTW, I’m not a homophobe; I’m a lesbian. Is that relevant to anything here?
Bill Gates, Sr. was on the board of Planned Parenthood, out of the same commitment to eugenics that drove Sanger (as she spelled out in her book The Pivot of Civilization). His commitment—which he shared with his pals, the Rockefellers—had a major impact on his son's worldview.
So these people are, or were, not "bigots," since their project wasn't based on any mere parochial distaste but on a full-blown fanatical devotion to EUGENICS; and so it is appropriate to link them. (I recommend Edwin Black's War Against the Weak, if you want a good book on that movement, whose history is far from over.)
Totally agree with you. Something is seriously wrong with this picture. Everything they do just seems like there brainwashed brain dead STUPID and Karen’s Watch people and really look at them I see vaccines and a empty head