131 Comments

I thought Anthony Bourdain's sentiments about Henry Kissinger was perfect:

"Once you’ve been to Cambodia, you’ll never stop wanting to beat Henry Kissinger to death with your bare hands. You will never again be able to open a newspaper and read about that treacherous, prevaricating, murderous scumbag sitting down for a nice chat with Charlie Rose or attending some black-tie affair for a new glossy magazine without choking. Witness what Henry did in Cambodia – the fruits of his genius for statesmanship – and you will never understand why he’s not sitting in the dock at The Hague next to Milošević."

Expand full comment

Only disagreement: that's an insult to Milosevic. Seriously.

Expand full comment

True, but the rest of what Bourdain said was flawless.

Expand full comment

they invaded Laos illegally too

Expand full comment

All imperialist invasions are illegal, but Empires create their own rules.

Expand full comment

I hope Anthony Bourdain joins Kissinger in Hell. Watch the Cologne video where he advocates the elimination of white people by miscegenation.

Expand full comment

Kissinger actually committed genocide.

Expand full comment

Eradication of white people IS genocide

Expand full comment

Who did he eradicate?

Expand full comment

he suggested it was necessary and desirable. Isn't that enough ?

Expand full comment

It's stupid to compare a "thought crime" with an actual genocide.

Expand full comment

It's a sad thing when you see a man's death and all you can think is "What took you so long, you miserable bloody bastard?"

Expand full comment

R.I.P., Henry....I do hope he rests in piss.

Expand full comment

Good one….do you know there are lots of stories of NDEs who visited Hell briefly, got a good scare, and came back to tell about it…Henry and the others are there by now…not to worry

Expand full comment

Without considering what is in all the links, it is very important to note that Le Duc Tho refused the Nobel Peaceofshit Prize. He is the only person to ever refuse this award.

Equally important to note is the reason he refused it — peace was not achieved!

Expand full comment

Wow! Much Respect!

Expand full comment

Thanks. I wasn't aware of this.

Expand full comment

was going to say the same thing :-))

Expand full comment

And Vietnam is now an economic powerhouse.

Expand full comment

vietnam is blanketed with toxins- from corporate industry and napalm- sweat shops and child prostitution

also think agent orange and 24D and 24T courtesy of the US taxpayers-- according to the man who was head of that program- who came here to marin to warn and educate us about the danger of glyphosate (think bill gates-- knows as monsatan south of the border) When the now professor realized what was happening to the US troops who also suffered from these toxins and became a whistleblower- he stepped down from being a general and started in on his research.

Expand full comment

that's quite an optimistic point of view. the war trauma's need to heal (which might take at least 3 generations) and Vietnam is also very near China, so it's economic growth and independence is a devious balance act.

Expand full comment

Well said:

"considering Obama’s bloody legacy of “peace,” which makes Bush/Cheney look like two hard-edged peaceniks."

Obama got his Nobel peace prize after giving the most pro war speech and telling us that MLK's idea of peace didn’t really mean what he said. Then Obama went on to get us into 7 more wars and he either created ISIS or he looked the other way while they grew bigger. And of course during his tenure the CIA and the Pentagon armed and funded 2 separate terrorist groups which constantly fought each other.

Also Kissinger made fun of the dumb humans that were sent as cannon fodder for the corporations to steal country’s resources. Smedley Butler told us 100 years ago that he was just muscle for corporations in his book, War is a Racket that can be found online. Really worth a read.

Expand full comment

He is where eternally damned souls go now. Where he belongs.

Expand full comment

Maybe Kissinger is in hell with Madeline Albright and they are counting dead babies that their policies killed. Albright should have been shunned when said that yes indeed it was worth the 500,000 dead Iraqi children from our sanctions.

Expand full comment
author

By then it was not so much Kissinger per se as it was Zbigniew Brzezinski. an acolyte of his, who had a hand in that Iraq atrocity.

Expand full comment

For whatever Kissinger was directly responsible for, it is his influence on a generation or three of policy makers that will count the most bodies. They are some cold motherfuckers.

Expand full comment

and don't forget that hillary clinton said that kissinger was one of her main mentors- the same shrillary who said the most atrocious things about sadam as she gleefully watched his murder skewered on a pole- these people are satanic

Expand full comment

It was Ghaddafi not Sadam

Expand full comment

It doesn't seem that odd anymore that both Saddam and Ghaddafi were surprised that the US actually moved against them in their nations, facilitated their deaths. Both had been clients of the US, had agreements with the likes of Kissinger's and Albright's. Were told many times over the years that while the US speaks against them in public that it was just realpolitik theatrics, they'd be protected in the end. Like the Shah of Iran was. They were both genuinely surprised when they didn't get their last minute reprieve they were promised. To be an enemy of the US regime is dangerous. To be a friend of the US regime is often deadly. That lying for a greater good utlitarian ethics thing.

Expand full comment

Eugenicists. The both of them. They think the same thing about American children. But they had to start somewhere, the children of others "over there" gets a lot less pushback. Pssst - they, their disciples have the same beliefs and intentions for us and our children.

Remember, they practice what's known as Utilitarian ethics. All's ethical in service to a declared greater good. "Sometimes you have to break a few eggs to make an omelet" thinking. Eggs = skulls. Stalin's quote. Another Stalinism they believe, "one death is a tragedy, one-million deaths is a statistic." All considered "ethical" under utilitarian ethics. We, the People think of Virtue or Kantian ethics when we hear the word, "ethics." Very different ethics.

The eugenicist Kissinger's and Albright's understanding of utilitarianism, ends justifies the means, is what is taught in the Ivy's, the Rhodes Scholars, Oxford's, etc, to 'future leaders.' That leadership requires the cool, unemotional, level-headed ability to make difficult decisions that imperil some for a greater good. Human sentimentality has no place in leadership to them.

Lies are necessary to govern, they believe, the population too stupid or emotional to know what's good for them. And if caught in a lie then deflect by claiming benevolent intent, like Fauci and masking. They are taught this. It's not a coincidence that Fauci's wife, Christine Grady, is the Chief Bioethicist at the National Institute of Health. Utilitarian bioethicist.

Expand full comment

💯

Expand full comment

Colin Powell, too. All three of them in a couple of years. Did they have to open a new special pit of Hell for US Secretaries of State?

Expand full comment

Great addition! Did you know that during Trump it was exposed that every new SOS got together with the previous ones so that they knew what the long term plans were? That’s when he rescinded Brennan and Albright’s security clearance.

Expand full comment

wow, no wonder Brennan became a Trumeny

Expand full comment

Sorry, “policies” of murderous psychopaths did not kill babies the world over. WE are responsible for that because our tax dollars and complacency enabled that. We’re still enabling murder right now and until tens of millions of us hunt these people down (Schwab, Soros, Gates, Fauci, Birx…) and bring them to the righteous justice they deserve, we will continue to wash our hands in the blood of fellow citizens.

/rant

Expand full comment

Good rant. But we the people have no say in what the government does. We can protest, but the PTB just ignores them. Millions protested the Iraq war and yet they went ahead with it anyway.

A good video that explains how we are ignored is Corruption is Legal. In 20 years nothing we did changed what the government did.

Expand full comment

Incorrect. This is what all in non democracies know and we in democracies ignore, the individual citizen IS responsible for what their representatives do. If we took this as seriously as those who attack us as we travel abroad, then we would have clean out the swamp decades ago.

Expand full comment

Explain how we could have done this. The only way we have to hold our reps accountable is by voting and since our government has been captured by special interests and the many people behind the scenes running our policies I don’t see how voting makes any difference.

Imagine if we tried overthrowing our government and how it would respond.

But tell me how we can get the government to do what we want. I’m sure lots of people are interested in this.

Expand full comment

There are 4 boxes that guarantee freedom; the soap box, ballet box, jury box and when those fail, the 4th box. We are just to. Chicken to use all the tools we have.

However, if we paid attention to what our representatives were doing, we could have stopped this decades ago far easier than we can now.

Expand full comment

I’ll offer these words, perhaps you’re acquainted with them:

“But when a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same Object evinces a design to reduce them under absolute Despotism, it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such Government, and to provide new Guards for their future security.“

Expand full comment
Dec 1, 2023·edited Dec 1, 2023

It's not that we want to or should overthrow our government. The politicians and bureaucrats are merely the current set of administrators, ostensibly working for us. We are our government.

It comes down to one simple question, for me: what kind of world do I want my precious grandchildren to inherit. One of Liberty and opportunity, or am I going to selfishly live out the rest of my meager existence, under the radar, and cast them into the pits of hell we're racing towards.

Voting doesn't work, you should know that by now. It's rigged and even a few decades ago, when it might not have been, all the politicians lied to get elected, supposedly supporting the policies the people wanted, and then when they got into office did everything they could to enrich themselves and damn the people.

I saw a meme the other day, don't know if it's true, but AOC was a poor working girl, got herself (s)elected, and is now a millionaire. If that is true, our only course of action must, by now, be clear.

It has come down to them or us. They're doing everything they can to subjugate or murder us. Do you not have any instinct for your own survivial?

Long past time to FIGHT BACK. And, I mean fight in the old fashioned sense. The sense that created this once great Nation. Unfortunately, it doesn't seem like we have the will to live anymore, and TPTB know it. That's why they're prepping you for 15 minute cities, CBDC's, and "you'll own nothing and be happy", or else.

Expand full comment

Kissinger was David Rockefeller's pick to lead strategy for the Global Public Private Partnership, the G3P, see

Organizational Chart, Bank for International Settlements Kill Box

Organizational chart by Iain Davis, author of Pseudopandemic and What is the Global Public-Private Partnership (G3P)?

https://bailiwicknews.substack.com/p/organizational-chart-bank-for-international

Rockefeller chose Kissinger based on Kissinger's academic work, see

Kissinger’s Adoration of the 1815 Congress of Vienna: A Master Key into Universal History

https://matthewehret.substack.com/p/kissingers-adoration-of-the-1815

Expand full comment

Matt Ehret and his wife Cynthia are quite brilliant, they are Canadian

Expand full comment

Yes, been following them for a while, they are amazing. So is Katherine Watt at bailiwick too.

Expand full comment

Of course, they never mentioned that HK was one of the first to say the world population was getting too large and it had to be cut down to 500 million.

Expand full comment

Matches the now blown up Georgia Guidestones.

Expand full comment

My thoughts exactly!

Expand full comment

we're useless eaters

Expand full comment

Good riddance. Honor the dead Americans sent into the Vietnam War.

Expand full comment

I've been working on an extremely long essay on the Three Pronged Approach to Depopulation. It was about six months ago that I found out about both the Jaffee Memo and The Kissinger Report -- both shockingly written in a manner that displays no concern for humankind at all -- as if getting rid of the undesirables of the world is no worse than planning a picnic. I.e. this is the way it is and this is what we must do to correct the situation. But Kissinger's death won't stop the plan. We still have the globalists hard at work on the great reset that will microchip people like we do our dogs and cats so the population can be tracked.

The Club of Rome, whose members are working ambitiously exploring the "complex problems faced by humanity" (namely humanity itself is problem #1). Their report published 50 years ago, The Limits to Growth, shows that we have nearly reached the limits of the planet to sustain the population of 8 billion. It's time to a plan into action. Dennis Meadows, a member of The Club of Rome, said in a recent statement online that he wants "peaceful depopulation -- a civil way" to reduce the population to 1 billion people. "The planet can support something like a billion people, maybe 2 billion depending on how much liberty and how much material consumption you want to have."

Rest assured, depopulation plans include the "climate crisis" (you will not eat meat or farm using any type of fertilizer -- nitrogen you know, is bad for the climate so farming techniques that have been feeding an increasing population for the past 100+ years is forbidden). We are the problem that elitist globalists are attempting to solve. The 123-page Kissinger Report released Dec. 10, 1974 shows how cold and callous these people are who are planning our demise. But in the end, they will suffer the same fate as Henry Kissinger and all of us do eventually: Death is no respecter of persons. It gets us all sooner or later.

Expand full comment
author

Kissinger was merely a lieutenant, albeit a crazily ambitious one. He was "only following orders."

Expand full comment

The question is who was he following orders from.

Expand full comment

he started out with the Dems and by 1968 saw they were nowheresville so he switched to the GOP and was placed to run Nixon's foreign policy...I don't think HK had any loyalties to any particular idea or country besides himself

Expand full comment

I was fortunate to have a bright, talented piano player for a father. I have fabulous memories of him banging the box and singing all those songs. Especially when he was a few martinis in!!!

Expand full comment

Where’s Kissinger’s gravesite? I feel like dancin’!

Expand full comment

(I also have to pee.)

Expand full comment

Duece time?

Expand full comment

That may actually be classified

Expand full comment

Writhe in Hell, Henry.

Expand full comment

Was he the author/singer of "Poisoning Pigeons in the Park" song?

Expand full comment

and The Vatican Rag another great ditty

Expand full comment

He was!

Expand full comment

I liked yesterday better when I thought Kissinger was long dead.

But I will bask in this news...

Expand full comment

Funny as hell (no pun intended).

"Kissinger will spend the rest of eternity devising futile diplomatic ruses and stratagems aimed at enhancing Hell’s nonexistent chances of defeating Heaven."

Expand full comment

So brilliant ! :-)))))

Expand full comment

Henry who? Never met him, never cared to meet him and never shall meet him or any of his fellow travellers including that Nobel prize committee.

Nobel felt guilty about the killings in war that his work had enabled so he set up his prize system and in doing so he unfortunately handed control of Science and peace prizes to people who would reward only their clique members such as Kissinger, Obama, Mandela, terrorists all, and not the real innovators such as Malcolm X and Nikola Tesla

Expand full comment