Some standout horrors from our latest compilation, for those who don't have the time, and/or the stomach, to read through the entire "Died Suddenly" we posted yesterday
I have very much noticed the increase in infant and young children deaths reported here. I never have the stomach to read them. But I did today, here. Imagine if these deaths had been investigated, not hidden, what would be learned, and the children who would be saved from actions taken and not taken (NO JABS FOR MOTHERS AND BABIES). The day the FDA approved EUA for 6-12 years I cried. When they then moved it down finally to 6 months I cried more. Now when I learn of any covidian I know who's pregnant, I just have a certain contained horror, I'm steeling myself for tragedy. I read somewhere that only 1% of mothers are now taking the covid shots during pregnancy. Have no idea if that's true. Of course, these pregnant women are taking all kinds of other vaccines and flu shots, which is f**king bonkers. And then they're giving their 6 month old babies the shots, repeating over the next year. MCM, thank you for your constancy in reporting the news of these deaths.
I can only wonder what the level of under-reporting is, especially for babies. And I wonder how many babies are severely ill. This is appalling and is NOT normal.
In this particular list of unfortunate children, the majority of deaths occurred in TX, KY, TN, GA, AL, MS, LA, SC, KS, AR. No deaths in New England (including NY). A few in VA, CA and NJ.
"CDC confirms 100% of reported Covid-19 Vaccine Deaths were caused by just 5% of batches produced & the majority were sent to red Republican States across the USA"
The infant deaths by location mirror that in VAERS. Texas is a slight exception with 7 of the 58 deaths, in 2023 VAERS, Texas was 21st of the 50 states, “moderately” high but nowhere near the top. The worst 3 states in VAERS (by deaths per million doses): South Dakota, Tennessee, Kentucky are the states where 9 of the 58 infants died. There was one death in a New England state: Massachusetts.
I appreciate the monumental effort that goes into making the reports, and I scroll through each terrifying long report. With respect to the deaths of babies, though, it is difficult for me to assess the impact of the so-called vaccines (actually experimental transfections). First, there is no way to know the usual background rate of infant deaths and whether these reports show a clear increase over background. Second, it seems that it is usually not known whether either the parents or the child had received the shots. Does anyone know of a way to make the statistics clearer or to confirm that the shots are causing these deaths?
How many “infants deaths” does it take to defy the need for statistical support? This week it was 58. What will it take? 100? 500? 1000? Time will tell.
My comment is not meant to minimize the number. However, approximately three million deaths occur in the U.S.A. each year, or between 50 and 60 thousand per week. Not every infant death is included in these reports, but is 58 out of, say, 58,000 significant? Without more context, it is difficult to say, and I am certainly no expert on stillbirths (not sure whether they are counted) and infant deaths.
Thank you for your response. Your question is valid and it is a GREAT question. Though I am no expert on stillbirths I have experienced the traumatic and lasting effect it has had on women in my family. I took care of two female friends after their abortions. I wish I had encouraged them to have the babies.
The background rate was already skewed as USA already had an infant mortality comparable to a 3. world country. None of it is 'normal'. 'SIDS' is not 'normal'. In the fall of 2022, a famous hair stylist here in Denmark had twin girls from a surrogate mother in USA. One died of 'SIDS' at 1,5 months. She has just birthed him another little girl...
Also, Prof. Herve Seligmann told the European Parliament that child mortality rates had gone up (in Europe I think) when the injections were started being given to adults, which he said later leveled out. I suddenly had big, clustering bruises - ie internal bleedings - and sensory disturbances in the skin from shedding in 2021, and still have the latter. My friend reacted with nosebleeds and rashes around injected people. 'Environmental exposure', as Pfizer has termed it in their documents reg. pregnant or fertile women, is a very real and very serious thing.
So I think your question is quite impossible to answer without a thorough study which may include autopsies with the proper staining tests. All I can say is that in Denmark the fertility rate showed a little increase in 2021 and then a steep drop since 2022. I'm waiting for the 2024 data to be released.
What you have described is a huge problem that we face in assessing the damage done by medical interventions. For any individual case (considering that we are dealing with human beings with complex biology), it may be difficult to assign a cause to an injury (or death). There are sometimes ways to determine at least probable causes, but it requires more work and money. On a population level, properly applied statistical techniques can often be used to show increases, but the medical system is strongly biased against finding or admitting anything that would suggest harm (or even murder), and the government-media collusion will always try to censor, or even attack the researchers and authors who discover the negative outcomes. We need to continue to force the issue.
These obituaries get more heart-breaking every week. The CDC and any doctors who coerced pregnant women (or any woman of childbearing age for that matter) to get the jab, should be put in prison. They knew better and they all lied! I have known only one young woman whose doctor told her NOT to get the jab and it's not good for childbearing age women who are trying to get pregnant -- and NOT to get the jab if she got pregnant.
I'd never heard of Trisomy 13 until I started reading these obituaries -- now it seems that this genetic disorder is quite common -- obviously because of the genetic damage that is being done to young women due to the junk DNA found in these toxic shots. I'm not sure we'll ever have a "next" generation of youth at this rate.
the death and destruction these doctors caused by recommending the jabs especially to mothers. My daughter pregnant with her 2nd asked her doc on a phone call and his response freaked her out. I'd describe her as skeptical at the outset but she just lost her mind because she could tell the doctor was lying when he said to take it. Meanwhile she's expecting her 5th now and her children aren't getting any jabs whatsoever. My son however is in the the camp of jab them at 6 months which makes me so sad as I see the ongoing "killing spree" so aptly described by MCM.
If you watch the interview with Dr. Thorpe, he describes that placentas have changed in women who have been jabbed previously. And it’s not just the women who are jabbed when pregnant, but also women previously jabbed. If he is correct then the carnage being documented here will not decrease anytime soon.
From the interview it does appear that the nurses who assist with these grieving mothers are waking up to the destruction but it may be too late for a majority of women of childbearing age.
I suppose some may consider these lists presumptuous, that not everybody that dies is a victim of the toxic effects of the jab. However, it seems plausible that the jab is a catalyst, and that whatever the person may have eventually died from in the natural course of their life, the jab intervened and drew death nearer. In some respects, the jab appears to function very much like a stressor making people more susceptible to being overwhelmed by whatever ailment or weakness they possess. The jab is essentially fast-tracking death in a plethora of ways, depending on where the lipid nanoparticles are able to get a foothold. All of which suggests it's more likely people in general are dying from the jab, and wouldn't be, if they had chosen not to get jabbed.
I fully agree with you. I have been re-reading Turtles All the Way Down, which is an excellent guide to the fraud in so-called vaccine science. One very interesting idea that is raised is that those doing "vaccination" do not really know what they are doing. The proof of this is the use of the RCT (randomized control trial). If we really understood how the immune system works, then we would not need empirical statistical evidence to show (supposedly) that a vaccine is safe or effective. No one does a randomized control trial in the hard sciences, because the behavior of matter (at least above the quantum level) is much better understood than in the field of medicine.
Thanks for your reply. That's a good point about the trials I haven't heard before. I need to read the Turtles book. Strange that the author is anonymous. I suppose he's a whistleblower. The book by RFK Jr about Fauci is a zinger too.
The authors wanted to publish anonymously to force the discussion to be about the issues raised rather than about the authors (including the targeted destruction of careers and worse). Ad hominem attacks do not work well if no one can be identified to attack.
When this article landed in my inbox yesterday, I had just watched a short clip where Kill Bill said he had been to a 3 hour 'quite intriguing' dinner with the T guy after the election. Just him and two others, where they had talked about 'global health' and 'vaccine innovation' among other things. And they 'both got pretty exited about that', in Kill Bill's own words.
Another clip I saw was from the new administration, some Ellison guy, about AI and the development of a new 'vaccine' for cancer, based on a person's own DNA or something like that.
Absolutely. Just noticed the title of your Substack. How spot on! I was thinking that it seems as if the T guy still hasn't realized he is being 'misled'...
I appreciate your work on this subject. I came back to give it a "like" because my heart does not really "like" this information. I have reprogrammed myself to believe hitting the "like" means appreciation of the work, not liking what is reported.
I have very much noticed the increase in infant and young children deaths reported here. I never have the stomach to read them. But I did today, here. Imagine if these deaths had been investigated, not hidden, what would be learned, and the children who would be saved from actions taken and not taken (NO JABS FOR MOTHERS AND BABIES). The day the FDA approved EUA for 6-12 years I cried. When they then moved it down finally to 6 months I cried more. Now when I learn of any covidian I know who's pregnant, I just have a certain contained horror, I'm steeling myself for tragedy. I read somewhere that only 1% of mothers are now taking the covid shots during pregnancy. Have no idea if that's true. Of course, these pregnant women are taking all kinds of other vaccines and flu shots, which is f**king bonkers. And then they're giving their 6 month old babies the shots, repeating over the next year. MCM, thank you for your constancy in reporting the news of these deaths.
I can only wonder what the level of under-reporting is, especially for babies. And I wonder how many babies are severely ill. This is appalling and is NOT normal.
In this particular list of unfortunate children, the majority of deaths occurred in TX, KY, TN, GA, AL, MS, LA, SC, KS, AR. No deaths in New England (including NY). A few in VA, CA and NJ.
I wonder if it might be related to this:
https://www.2ndsmartestguyintheworld.com/p/cdc-confirms-100-of-reported-covid
"CDC confirms 100% of reported Covid-19 Vaccine Deaths were caused by just 5% of batches produced & the majority were sent to red Republican States across the USA"
The infant deaths by location mirror that in VAERS. Texas is a slight exception with 7 of the 58 deaths, in 2023 VAERS, Texas was 21st of the 50 states, “moderately” high but nowhere near the top. The worst 3 states in VAERS (by deaths per million doses): South Dakota, Tennessee, Kentucky are the states where 9 of the 58 infants died. There was one death in a New England state: Massachusetts.
I appreciate the monumental effort that goes into making the reports, and I scroll through each terrifying long report. With respect to the deaths of babies, though, it is difficult for me to assess the impact of the so-called vaccines (actually experimental transfections). First, there is no way to know the usual background rate of infant deaths and whether these reports show a clear increase over background. Second, it seems that it is usually not known whether either the parents or the child had received the shots. Does anyone know of a way to make the statistics clearer or to confirm that the shots are causing these deaths?
Great question. I have a question.
How many “infants deaths” does it take to defy the need for statistical support? This week it was 58. What will it take? 100? 500? 1000? Time will tell.
My comment is not meant to minimize the number. However, approximately three million deaths occur in the U.S.A. each year, or between 50 and 60 thousand per week. Not every infant death is included in these reports, but is 58 out of, say, 58,000 significant? Without more context, it is difficult to say, and I am certainly no expert on stillbirths (not sure whether they are counted) and infant deaths.
Thank you for your response. Your question is valid and it is a GREAT question. Though I am no expert on stillbirths I have experienced the traumatic and lasting effect it has had on women in my family. I took care of two female friends after their abortions. I wish I had encouraged them to have the babies.
The background rate was already skewed as USA already had an infant mortality comparable to a 3. world country. None of it is 'normal'. 'SIDS' is not 'normal'. In the fall of 2022, a famous hair stylist here in Denmark had twin girls from a surrogate mother in USA. One died of 'SIDS' at 1,5 months. She has just birthed him another little girl...
Also, Prof. Herve Seligmann told the European Parliament that child mortality rates had gone up (in Europe I think) when the injections were started being given to adults, which he said later leveled out. I suddenly had big, clustering bruises - ie internal bleedings - and sensory disturbances in the skin from shedding in 2021, and still have the latter. My friend reacted with nosebleeds and rashes around injected people. 'Environmental exposure', as Pfizer has termed it in their documents reg. pregnant or fertile women, is a very real and very serious thing.
So I think your question is quite impossible to answer without a thorough study which may include autopsies with the proper staining tests. All I can say is that in Denmark the fertility rate showed a little increase in 2021 and then a steep drop since 2022. I'm waiting for the 2024 data to be released.
What you have described is a huge problem that we face in assessing the damage done by medical interventions. For any individual case (considering that we are dealing with human beings with complex biology), it may be difficult to assign a cause to an injury (or death). There are sometimes ways to determine at least probable causes, but it requires more work and money. On a population level, properly applied statistical techniques can often be used to show increases, but the medical system is strongly biased against finding or admitting anything that would suggest harm (or even murder), and the government-media collusion will always try to censor, or even attack the researchers and authors who discover the negative outcomes. We need to continue to force the issue.
🎯
These obituaries get more heart-breaking every week. The CDC and any doctors who coerced pregnant women (or any woman of childbearing age for that matter) to get the jab, should be put in prison. They knew better and they all lied! I have known only one young woman whose doctor told her NOT to get the jab and it's not good for childbearing age women who are trying to get pregnant -- and NOT to get the jab if she got pregnant.
I'd never heard of Trisomy 13 until I started reading these obituaries -- now it seems that this genetic disorder is quite common -- obviously because of the genetic damage that is being done to young women due to the junk DNA found in these toxic shots. I'm not sure we'll ever have a "next" generation of youth at this rate.
the death and destruction these doctors caused by recommending the jabs especially to mothers. My daughter pregnant with her 2nd asked her doc on a phone call and his response freaked her out. I'd describe her as skeptical at the outset but she just lost her mind because she could tell the doctor was lying when he said to take it. Meanwhile she's expecting her 5th now and her children aren't getting any jabs whatsoever. My son however is in the the camp of jab them at 6 months which makes me so sad as I see the ongoing "killing spree" so aptly described by MCM.
If you watch the interview with Dr. Thorpe, he describes that placentas have changed in women who have been jabbed previously. And it’s not just the women who are jabbed when pregnant, but also women previously jabbed. If he is correct then the carnage being documented here will not decrease anytime soon.
From the interview it does appear that the nurses who assist with these grieving mothers are waking up to the destruction but it may be too late for a majority of women of childbearing age.
Awful sad x 58 babies add infantilism. Well Dr Italianos become extinct?
I suppose some may consider these lists presumptuous, that not everybody that dies is a victim of the toxic effects of the jab. However, it seems plausible that the jab is a catalyst, and that whatever the person may have eventually died from in the natural course of their life, the jab intervened and drew death nearer. In some respects, the jab appears to function very much like a stressor making people more susceptible to being overwhelmed by whatever ailment or weakness they possess. The jab is essentially fast-tracking death in a plethora of ways, depending on where the lipid nanoparticles are able to get a foothold. All of which suggests it's more likely people in general are dying from the jab, and wouldn't be, if they had chosen not to get jabbed.
I fully agree with you. I have been re-reading Turtles All the Way Down, which is an excellent guide to the fraud in so-called vaccine science. One very interesting idea that is raised is that those doing "vaccination" do not really know what they are doing. The proof of this is the use of the RCT (randomized control trial). If we really understood how the immune system works, then we would not need empirical statistical evidence to show (supposedly) that a vaccine is safe or effective. No one does a randomized control trial in the hard sciences, because the behavior of matter (at least above the quantum level) is much better understood than in the field of medicine.
Thanks for your reply. That's a good point about the trials I haven't heard before. I need to read the Turtles book. Strange that the author is anonymous. I suppose he's a whistleblower. The book by RFK Jr about Fauci is a zinger too.
The authors wanted to publish anonymously to force the discussion to be about the issues raised rather than about the authors (including the targeted destruction of careers and worse). Ad hominem attacks do not work well if no one can be identified to attack.
When this article landed in my inbox yesterday, I had just watched a short clip where Kill Bill said he had been to a 3 hour 'quite intriguing' dinner with the T guy after the election. Just him and two others, where they had talked about 'global health' and 'vaccine innovation' among other things. And they 'both got pretty exited about that', in Kill Bill's own words.
Another clip I saw was from the new administration, some Ellison guy, about AI and the development of a new 'vaccine' for cancer, based on a person's own DNA or something like that.
Warp Speed II is in the works.
Absolutely. Just noticed the title of your Substack. How spot on! I was thinking that it seems as if the T guy still hasn't realized he is being 'misled'...
I trust the T guy about as far as I could throw him.
My blood freezes when I see or think of him.
😂🤣
I appreciate your work on this subject. I came back to give it a "like" because my heart does not really "like" this information. I have reprogrammed myself to believe hitting the "like" means appreciation of the work, not liking what is reported.
Shakespeare meets Vaccine Injury Denial. Watch the music video: PERCHANCE TO DREAM. https://turfseer.substack.com/p/new-music-video-release-perchance
e la strage continua......