NBC's Antonia Hylton has "rare cancer"; Amy Robach, who has cancer, mourns cancer death of Olivia Summer Hutcherson; "Shannon Doherty reveals cancer has spread to her bones" (CORRECTED)
NBC's Antonia Hylton has "rare cancer"; Amy Robach, who has cancer, mourns cancer death of Olivia Summer Hutcherson; "Shannon Doherty reveals cancer has spread to her bones" (CORRECTED)
Suleika Jaouad, John Batiste's wife, does chemotherapy; Christian LaBlanc shares cancer update; Dario G's rectal cancer; "Young tennis player collapses during press conference in frightening scene"
If they do wake up, they're not talking. If they don't wake up, they'll die not knowing. Denial is also very strong in many. It's hard to admit for most they made a dumb decision. Even worse, knowing you were played into making that decision.
More factoids and, to my knowledge, from what I have seen/read so far, zero evidence. I have asked some for evidence and I am told to watch a video.
When I am asked for evidence that the usa has lied - AGAIN - for the zillionth time, I provided IRREFUTABLE evidence.
AGAIN, I am not saying that there are not any problems with the vaccines and vaccines in general. As far as I know there has ALWAYS been problems with vaccines. Some people are affected, some get sick, some die. I do not believe that anyone who is on the side of "problematic vaccines" has suggested that a majority of people who have had the vaccineS have died or been harmed in whatever way.
How are we supposed to get irrefutable evidence when there has been such a concerted effort between the pharma companies, the governments all over the world, and the media to cover it up? Things are tricking out and eventually we will find it. In the meantime we can only use our eyes and common sense. The number of very young people dropping dead of cardiac arrest is shocking compared to what we've seen the rest of our lives.
"common sense" is what has the vast majority of westerners totally brainwashed.
So they leap on the usa bandwagon, swallowing deeply all the usa lies, which is leading us to the final war, WW3, which will end all the life of all larger creatures including stupid humans.
That is not what he is saying. He is saying our personal experiences which we all witness is real. Quantifying it i to gold standard research is not going to happen though at this point. This doesn’t mean our experiences are wrong. Five young guys on my job site, permanently injured. A key man, paid $225,000 a year, sick maybe 25% of the time now. And another 25% working but unwell. Two people on my block, neighbours, sudden heart problems. Many neighbours with early onset dementia. This is all new.
I do not really disagree with the generalities you have written, William. I am only saying that there is a paucity of evidence. If we actually held ourselves to high standards of evidence we could also demand the same from usa/western lying governments and the world would be in much better shape.
Why go to falsehoods just to avoid reality? I "bash" war criminal, genocidal, crimes against humanity, ... usa governments. The historical record is crystal clear that the above is undeniable. So why would any honest human being deny these realities. How many innocents has the usa slaughtered just since the usa lies of 9/11? Do you even have the slightest clue? It's more than the German Holocaust.
You can't find the truth if you're not looking for it. You rely on being spoonfed whatever is easy. I see hard evidence every day. If you want to see it, you'll find it. If you don't? Good luck!
Is your post directed to the general public, Curtis? I NEVER rely on being spoon fed, which is just another description of swallowing the always rank usa propaganda. The way science works, MUST work is writing papers, WITH EVIDENCE so following scientists can address said evidence. Can you point out any evidence in these posts that can be addressed by others?
I can, but I've wasted too much time casting pearls before swine. I see you are not subscribed to any Stacks, so I'll give you the benefit of simply being ignorant. I subscribe to probably 30, and pay for several. Go to my profile and start reading. Or not. I don't actually care anymore. Sheeple gonna sheeple.
This is rather humorous, Curtis. Since I have brought up this no evidence thang, all those that have replied to me, let's call them the "believers", have written all manner of replies, like yours above, but no actual evidence. Lots of folks have been upvoting me, obviously I can't say exactly why - because no evidence - but no actual evidence. But some direct and some indirect ad homs. No problem with those but evidence would be nice.
The evidence is all over the place. Did you read any of the thousands of sources that I directed you to?? If you choose to wait for others to spoon feed it to you, then so be it.
Evidence is not going to show up in the curated medical journals that depend on Pharma $$ for ads & for funding of the research that authors do & write up to put in their journals; med center administrators aren’t going to put up with physicians researchers whose research undermines ‘safe & effective’, & therefore cuts off funding for their operations; wake up & smell the coffee.
Go to flccc.net & review Dr. Ryan Cole’s talk @ their spring conference in Dallas, or the other oncologist who spoke there then. Talk to any clinical (not research) oncologist for how their practice has changed.
Talk to neighbors, friends, coworkers & ask them about their family’s health.
Talk to nursing home staff, funeral directors. They know, they will tell you.
You make some good, solid points as regards medical journals, Sir. But then you end by suggesting that we listen to hearsay, opinions, ... . That doesn't sound like science to me. Now if those "opinions" are actual testimonies that can be gathered into some semblance of a study, that is great. Most studies do start with folks noticing something not quite right, kosher, ... .
An oncologist who in 20 years of practice has seen 1case of a certain type of cancer in twenty something year old women and suddenly after 2021 has seen 15 cases in women less than 30 years old is more than hearsay. You sound like you are on Pfizer’s payroll.
That is NOT evidence, Roger, that is an anomaly, which, DO NOT GET ME WRONG, needs to be investigated. If you are that oncologist or if you know more of this, why not explain it. Have there been more studies?
It doesn’t have to be a majority. One in 100 dying is world changing. Five to ten times that being seriously injured is world changing. Those are likely numbers too. 1 in 100 of those being vaxed would be more than WWII numbers of deaths.
4.5 to 6 million have died, virtually all Muslims, people in all the usa illegal invasions of nations the usa has lied about since usa 9/11 lies falsely accusing OBL and Muslims in general. Here we have a usa Holocaust, larger in number than the Nazi Holocaust so why so much concern for these small in comparison deaths. All without CLEAR EVIDENCE.
The evidence that "vaccination" has killed countless people, and badly sickened countless others, is undeniable, as is now clear from an ever-growing number of scientific studies—studies as definitive as the evidence of US war crimes. (I will be posting several recent ones quite soon.)
On the other hand, the evidence in these reports of people "dying suddenly" is circumstantial, but quite compelling nonetheless.(There's a common misperception that circumstantial evidence is not admissible in court, although in fact it is.)
Your fantasy that there's a "lack of evidence" for the jabs' lethality appears to be related to your hobbyhorse re: US crimes against humanity. Apparently you want to think that the ongoing globalist depopulation drive is somehow less provable—and less horrific—than what you want to think the USA alone has done. That is, to put it mildly, a tendentious notion, and conveniently distracting from the Holocaust now going on worldwide.
Thus your fervent moralizing serves the globalist agenda. I'm sure that your collaboration is unwitting. In any case, your rants are taking up a LOT of space.
MCM: Your fantasy that there's a "lack of evidence" for the jabs' lethality
==============
I have NEVER said that, I have asked why none is presented here. I do NOT know what exists out there so why leap to this unwarranted assumption you have laid out.
If mine were "rants" they could be easily knocked down with evidence.
2. MCM: "the evidence in these reports of people "dying suddenly" is circumstantial, but quite compelling nonetheless. TB: AGREE, needs more study. There must have been some so where is the evidence?
3. No fantasy at all, Mark. The total lack of any presented by anyone says some odd things. Even after I brought this issue up. One, why don't people just present the evidence? I don't for a moment believe that there aren't people deeply evil enough to cover up lots of deeply amoral things. This is the entire history of the usa, certainly not the only one but by far the world's leader in amorality. The usa shines as thee global depopulationist leaders. All solely just to steal others wealth.
Terry, 1. I don’t believe your statement for a second. 2. There is an obvious deliberate avoidance of studying the causes of died suddenly, cause unknown--almost exactly like the investigation into the cocaine found in the White House; TPTB don’t want to know why people are suddenly dying at abnormal rates.
3. You seem to think that the USA is uniquely evil, why is that? What is your background? You clearly have either not read Solzhenitsyn or don’t believe him where he says that the line dividing good and evil runs right through every man’s heart.
I find it curious that you put so much faith in’published studies, given the fact that there is a real documented problem (& I am not going to go hunt them up for you) with not only curated research ( studies designed to fail, studies designed to prove toxicity by deliberate over dosing), suppression/retraction of well done research that against the narrative, but actual fraudulent research (results fabricated/altered, research never actually done, but published as if it was done.
It seems to me, given those problems with the published literature, is at least as likely to be wrong as some collection of observations by random observers ‘evidence’ (which, btw, you have not deigned, to give us a definition of what constitutes evidence in your humble opinion).
Wm. F. Buckley famously said that he would rather be governed by a random collection (or it may have been the first ‘x’ number) of names in the Boston phone book than the Harvard faculty. I think that we have an analogous situation here, and I as well as most of the posters here are voting for the phone book list.
M William: And your evidence he USA has killed 4.5-6.0 million Muslims is.....?
========================
The usual usa actions like the Vietnam Holocaust where the usa did the equal of the world famous Holocaust which was tiny compared to the American Holocaust and the Black Holocaust. And the usa Korean Holocaust, Cambodian Holocaust, Laotian H, Indonesian H, East Timor H, Chilean H, ... .
"432,093 civilians have died violent deaths as a direct result of the U.S. post-9/11 wars. An estimated 3.6-3.8 million people have died indirectly in post-9/11 war zones, bringing the total death toll to at least 4.5-4.7 million and counting.
Are you a moron or what. I gave you a bunch of hard statistical data that show at least 1 death per 1000 jabs and 1 in 100 injuries per jab. Go read prof. Rancourt research or prof. Fenton or kirsch here
Its interesting that you want to see evidence of the harm being done. I would ask where is the evidence that the jabs are effective at reducing covid and reducing mortality? Where is the evidence that they are safe? What normally takes 8 to 10 years to approve a jab was done in a matter of months? Why did pharma want to release their initial data in 75 years? My best friend is like you and I enjoy our discussions but cannot for the life of me understand how he cant see the obvious.
It is interesting that folks can't seem to address me directly, commonscents. We agree on virtually all you say but STILL no one has provided any evidence. I cannot for the life of me fathom being part of a mutual admiration society that eschews evidence. MCM has said some is coming. Why on Earth hasn't it flooded these pages since the query was first put forward?
What matters is freedom of choice. Freedom to refuse a medical treatment without losing one's livelihood. Do you trust pharma that was found guilty of harm and paid out billions as a result? Do you agree with "mandates"? That is what is illegal and unethical.
I suspect that you are asking these questions of me, Ty? Why are folks so cagey? I agree with the things you have said but that does NOT in any way change or negate my initial point. There is a paucity of evidence. The powers that be must be roaring in laughter at the "citizens" and their inability to even discuss issues rationally and fully, with evidence. They are saying, "Our brainwashing is doing super!!!"
In a revealing interview with Liz Gunn, a New Zealand government data administrator identified as Winston Smith has come forward with startling claims regarding the consequences of the COVID-19 vaccine rollout in New Zealand.
Winston Smith emphasizes that he is not an anti-vaxxer. He clarifies that he has been vaccinated in the past and has even contributed to building the COVID vaccination system in New Zealand, which gave him access to the data , making it clear that his stance is not born from opposition to vaccines on principle.
Winston's findings on the mortality rates associated with various COVID-19 vaccine batches present a very concerning picture, suggesting a correlation that seems highly improbable to occur by chance alone. For instance, looking at the top ten batches with the highest mortality rate, he found the following:
For batch 1, out of 711 vaccinated individuals, 152 fatalities were reported, indicating a staggering 21% mortality rate
Batch 8, with a 17% mortality rate,
Batch 3 with 15% mortality rate
Even among larger sample sizes, such as batch number 70 that vaccinated 11,000 individuals, there were 498 deaths accounted for, representing a 4% mortality rate.
Such numbers vastly exceed the expected mortality rates which is 0.75% and with Smith's meticulous approach and diverse age distribution consideration, the suggestion that these outcomes are mathematically bordering on impossible becomes difficult to ignore.
Whatever Winston knows about the data surrounding vaccines he doesn't know much about humanity, which clearly ain't! The American Holocaust - 100 million Indigenous people slaughtered, the Canadian Holocaust, the aussie Holocaust, the kiwi Holocaust, all the Latin American Holocausts, all the uk Holocausts, ... .
All of the above still going on to this day and none of these massive genocides have been honestly addressed, fully acknowledged and dealt with in any actual honest manner.
The defining thread thru all of these Holocausts is White "christians".
Canadian Holocaust? Are you referring to the residential school mass graves that actually didn’t happen? Or the small pox infected blankets given out deliberately in the 1600s to natives by the Christian Quakers, despite no one knowing what smallpox was then, and they certainly would have had no way of protecting themselves from it even if it were possible to do this.
I see you zero in on the inane ideas/examples of those of the desantis ilk, William. AGAIN, not a shred of evidence.
==============
It was in pursuit of these and other grand visions that Jefferson later would write of the remaining Indians in America that the government was obliged "now to pursue them to extermination, or drive them to new seats beyond our reach." For the native peoples of Jefferson's "rising nation," of his "beloved country"-far from being Bolivar's "legitimate owners"- were in truth, most Americans believed, little more than dangerous wolves. Andrew Jackson said this plainly in urging American troops to root out from their "dens" and kill Indian women and their "whelps," adding in his second annual message to Congress that while some people tended to grow "melancholy" over the Indians' being driven by white Americans to their "tomb," an understanding of "true philanthropy reconciles the mind to these vicissitudes as it does to the extinction of one generation to make room for another."
Before either Jefferson or Jackson, George Washington, the father of the country, had said much the same thing: the Indians were wolves and beasts who deserved nothing from the whites but "total ruin." And Washington himself was only repeating what by then was a very traditional observation. Less than a decade after the founding of the Massachusetts Bay Colony in 1630, for example, it was made illegal to "shoot off a gun on any unnecessary occasion, or at any game except an Indian or a wolf." As Barry Lopez has noted, this was far from a single-incident comparison. So alike did Indians and wolves appear to even the earliest land hungry New England colonist that the colonist "fell to dealing with them in similar ways":
He set out poisoned meat for the wolf and gave the Indian blankets infected with smallpox. He raided the wolf's den to dig out and destroy the pups, and stole the Indian's children .... When he was accused of butchery for killing wolves and Indians, he spun tales of Mohawk cruelty and of wolves who ate fawns while they were still alive.... Indians and wolves who later came into areas where there were no more of either were called renegades. Wolves that lay around among the buffalo herds were called loafer wolves and Indians that hung around the forts were called loafer Indians.
As is so often the case, it was New England's religious elite who made the point more graphically than anyone. Referring to some Indians who had given offense to the colonists, the Reverend Cotton Mather wrote: "Once you have but got the Track of those Ravenous howling Wolves, then pursue them vigourously; Turn not back till they are consumed.... Beat them small as the Dust before the Wind." Lest this be regarded as mere rhetoric, empty of literal intent, consider that another of New England's most esteemed religious leaders, the Reverend Solomon Stoddard, as late as 1703 formally proposed to the Massachusetts Governor that the colonists be given the financial wherewithal to purchase and train large packs of dogs "to hunt Indians as they do bears." There were relatively few Indians remaining alive in New England by this time, but those few were too many for the likes of Mather and Stoddard. "The dogs would be an extreme terror to the Indians," Stoddard wrote, adding that such "dogs would do a great deal of execution upon the enemy and catch many an Indian that would be too light of foot for us." Then, turning from his equating of native men and women and children with bears deserving to be hunted down and destroyed, Stoddard became more conventional in his imagery: "if the Indians were as other people," he acknowledged, ". . . it might be looked upon as inhumane to pursue them in such a manner"; but, in fact, the Indians were wolves, he said, "and are to be dealt withal as wolves." For two hundred years to come Washington, Jefferson, Jackson, and other leaders, representing the wishes of virtually the entire white nation, followed these ministers' genocidal instructions with great care. It was their Christian duty as well as their destiny.
I would like to hope this is the worst but I think the worst is yet to come. I personally believe tens of millions of people are going to die. I really hope I'm wrong but it's not looking this way at all. It's getting worse.
Yeah. It could go either way. But at this point it appears the worst is maybe just emerging. Cancers take time to develop. On the positive side, our immune systems are beyond understanding. They are gifts from God. Eventually they will prevail. How many die before our immune systems sort it out though?
I do believe we are in the last days. The world has never witnessed anything like this. We're seeing the one world government coming into power, one world currency, and we're witnessing the destruction of Christendom as well as the others. Most likely so they can usher in their one world Luciferian doctrines. We are also told many would die during this time. Our bodies are incredible at healing but He's the only one who can heal someone who has taken this poison. My belief is if God isn't done with you, you aren't going to die.
The problem is our immune systems will never be able to sort out continual poisoning. If the bioweapon shots were outlawed tomorrow, our immune systems would have a chance to clear out the poison. But shot after shot after shot (and given to children) is like dosing someone with arsenic on the sly and waiting for the inevitable death of that person. The chemo effect of cumulative poison will ALWAYS destroy immune systems and lead to death.
My family hired a person to do a job, I told them from the get go he was a bad apple, for years I said to not use his services. The guy finally got canned from his job by the corporate entities.
Every so often his name will come up and I will hear "I am so glad he is gone" etc. And not one of them will admit that I was right even when I point that tidbit out to them. I get silence. He is a topic I have no qualms rubbing it in their faces.
The death vaxx is a little more sensitive of a topic to rub in their face, but the wind up is yes, they simply cannot admit they were wrong. Sheeple going in, Sheeple going out.
They may never speak of it, seeing how others have been treated, but booster uptake is well below 20%. 20% of us never took any, so the majority are seeing through the matrix of lies.
Even if I were not so dumb, perhaps educated in the science of medicine, and the inner-workings of the cell, it would seem to me that to introduce any un-natural foreign chemical or substance simply could hardly offer any advantage, and much more likely, confound the system's defenses. Enter: C-spike protein, and all the adjuvants associated, and if we have even correctly identified these to be the extent of what is being injected, can there be much doubt as to the ill-effects they create? Reading others' comments, it's difficult to disagree or doubt that such a lahar of anecdotal evidence is not scientifically valid. Using the analogy of identifying a "duck," one might say, If it walks, floats, quacks, looks like, flocks like, nests, eats and mates like a duck, then it's probably a duck! Likewise, if there is consistent evidence of circumstantial evidence being accumulated continuously it is most likely worthy of serious note.
But humans are unique creatures, and not robots. Weighted evidence is not, as we have seen, the end-all to the problem. People lie to themselves and trust falsehoods rather than face the uncomfortable truths presented in waves of logic accompanied by reliable evidence of illicit motives.
Bill Gates has OPENLY stated the intentional use of "vaccines" to reduce the population problem! And yet, almost half of the people still doubt it, even when obviated. It's very peculiar to witness all of this.
As a Christian "Fundamentalist," it has been far and above an easy thing to discredit the paradigm of the Atheistic world view. As the "duck" analogy dictates, when there is a concerted effort to disavow any evidence relating to the Truth as it is in the KJV Bible, then questions automatically arise. Just as in a murder trial, witnesses are examined and cross-examined thoroughly, and every shred of evidence (is expected to be) examined. But when scoffing and character assassination replaces jurisprudence, it leaves an evidence trail of it's own behind. This should be ample to suggest illicit posturing.
Again, humans gravitate toward comfort, and decidedly befriend a convenient lie rather than face off with the reality of things. One such reality; one which is with great difficulty ignored, highlights the existence of "evil." When all things are considered, the reality of such is overwhelming indeed. Contrarily, the "Good, Right, Just" side of the situation must then be acknowledged as well. If Satan; formerly "Lucifer" the "covering cherub" as per Genesis Account is a real entity, with powers (allowed by God) to wield against souls, then we best take note. We also best take note that we as humans are no match for his deceptive powers, and that our only hope toward Salvation, is in Christ the Redeemer.
As time moves forward, there will be seen evidences which formerly were not so clearly manifested. These will act as a wedge between Good and evil, begging the conscience to make a decision between the two. Worship and obedience to ALL the Commandments of God will dictate ones eternal fate, whether it be life or death. All the other distractions and delusions are to confuse.
It took me some time to ascribe as "imperialism" the US behavior on its vaccine promotion efforts, but after reviewing the course of events since the start of the Covid-19 crisis I found this as an inescapable fact-the US has tried to impose on the world its new vaccine development, its parameters for defining "efficacy" and its pernicious propaganda efforts at putting down other countries' vaccine projects. The US effort at pushing the vaccine into development reeks of the capitalist profit purpose, starting with the billions of Dollars from Trump's May 2020 "Warp Speed" to US Big Pharma that promptly pushed stocks prices and the Pharma executives went on shares selling sprees continuously since July 2020. US media simultaneously went on a hyped campaign of "95% effectiveness" or efficacy of the US mRNA vaccines which now emerges to be based on debatable data.
Thank goodness though they are vaxed! Think how much worse it would be dying of cancer and getting a four day cold?
At what point will the average person wake up? Will five people they know have to die before they think ‘hmmm, ya know, this isn’t normal.’
If they do wake up, they're not talking. If they don't wake up, they'll die not knowing. Denial is also very strong in many. It's hard to admit for most they made a dumb decision. Even worse, knowing you were played into making that decision.
More factoids and, to my knowledge, from what I have seen/read so far, zero evidence. I have asked some for evidence and I am told to watch a video.
When I am asked for evidence that the usa has lied - AGAIN - for the zillionth time, I provided IRREFUTABLE evidence.
AGAIN, I am not saying that there are not any problems with the vaccines and vaccines in general. As far as I know there has ALWAYS been problems with vaccines. Some people are affected, some get sick, some die. I do not believe that anyone who is on the side of "problematic vaccines" has suggested that a majority of people who have had the vaccineS have died or been harmed in whatever way.
This doesn't have to be an echo chamber, does it?
How are we supposed to get irrefutable evidence when there has been such a concerted effort between the pharma companies, the governments all over the world, and the media to cover it up? Things are tricking out and eventually we will find it. In the meantime we can only use our eyes and common sense. The number of very young people dropping dead of cardiac arrest is shocking compared to what we've seen the rest of our lives.
"common sense" is what has the vast majority of westerners totally brainwashed.
So they leap on the usa bandwagon, swallowing deeply all the usa lies, which is leading us to the final war, WW3, which will end all the life of all larger creatures including stupid humans.
I don’t know any unvaxed who buy into anything.
You do not even seem to grasp just how wrong your notion is. You are saying, "If you don't have evidence then just make stuff up".
This is largely what is wrong with the world. The usa just makes shit up all the time and folks buy these lies without any thought.
That is not what he is saying. He is saying our personal experiences which we all witness is real. Quantifying it i to gold standard research is not going to happen though at this point. This doesn’t mean our experiences are wrong. Five young guys on my job site, permanently injured. A key man, paid $225,000 a year, sick maybe 25% of the time now. And another 25% working but unwell. Two people on my block, neighbours, sudden heart problems. Many neighbours with early onset dementia. This is all new.
I do not really disagree with the generalities you have written, William. I am only saying that there is a paucity of evidence. If we actually held ourselves to high standards of evidence we could also demand the same from usa/western lying governments and the world would be in much better shape.
There isn’t a paucity. It is massive. And being ignored by most people. Sounds a bit like you too. I am
Assuming, and maybe not, you are vaxed.
So you really just want to bash Americans. Got it, won't waste any more time on you.
Why go to falsehoods just to avoid reality? I "bash" war criminal, genocidal, crimes against humanity, ... usa governments. The historical record is crystal clear that the above is undeniable. So why would any honest human being deny these realities. How many innocents has the usa slaughtered just since the usa lies of 9/11? Do you even have the slightest clue? It's more than the German Holocaust.
You can't find the truth if you're not looking for it. You rely on being spoonfed whatever is easy. I see hard evidence every day. If you want to see it, you'll find it. If you don't? Good luck!
Is your post directed to the general public, Curtis? I NEVER rely on being spoon fed, which is just another description of swallowing the always rank usa propaganda. The way science works, MUST work is writing papers, WITH EVIDENCE so following scientists can address said evidence. Can you point out any evidence in these posts that can be addressed by others?
I can, but I've wasted too much time casting pearls before swine. I see you are not subscribed to any Stacks, so I'll give you the benefit of simply being ignorant. I subscribe to probably 30, and pay for several. Go to my profile and start reading. Or not. I don't actually care anymore. Sheeple gonna sheeple.
This is rather humorous, Curtis. Since I have brought up this no evidence thang, all those that have replied to me, let's call them the "believers", have written all manner of replies, like yours above, but no actual evidence. Lots of folks have been upvoting me, obviously I can't say exactly why - because no evidence - but no actual evidence. But some direct and some indirect ad homs. No problem with those but evidence would be nice.
The evidence is all over the place. Did you read any of the thousands of sources that I directed you to?? If you choose to wait for others to spoon feed it to you, then so be it.
Evidence is not going to show up in the curated medical journals that depend on Pharma $$ for ads & for funding of the research that authors do & write up to put in their journals; med center administrators aren’t going to put up with physicians researchers whose research undermines ‘safe & effective’, & therefore cuts off funding for their operations; wake up & smell the coffee.
Go to flccc.net & review Dr. Ryan Cole’s talk @ their spring conference in Dallas, or the other oncologist who spoke there then. Talk to any clinical (not research) oncologist for how their practice has changed.
Talk to neighbors, friends, coworkers & ask them about their family’s health.
Talk to nursing home staff, funeral directors. They know, they will tell you.
You make some good, solid points as regards medical journals, Sir. But then you end by suggesting that we listen to hearsay, opinions, ... . That doesn't sound like science to me. Now if those "opinions" are actual testimonies that can be gathered into some semblance of a study, that is great. Most studies do start with folks noticing something not quite right, kosher, ... .
An oncologist who in 20 years of practice has seen 1case of a certain type of cancer in twenty something year old women and suddenly after 2021 has seen 15 cases in women less than 30 years old is more than hearsay. You sound like you are on Pfizer’s payroll.
That is NOT evidence, Roger, that is an anomaly, which, DO NOT GET ME WRONG, needs to be investigated. If you are that oncologist or if you know more of this, why not explain it. Have there been more studies?
Terry, that was a hypothetical. Dowd , Cause Unknown. Published book.
I bet you think Lee Harvey Oswald was the lone gunman who killed JFK, because it was published in the Warren Commision Report
Anecdotal data is often the first stage in forming a hypothesis.
I’m beginning to question your “scientific” bona fides
Okay, Mehen tells us there is no evidence only "anecdotal data". And it has led to folks "forming a hypothesis". GREAT! Now where is the evidence.
And another ad hom.
You are the very definition of an ad hom, Elon has suggestion for you.
It doesn’t have to be a majority. One in 100 dying is world changing. Five to ten times that being seriously injured is world changing. Those are likely numbers too. 1 in 100 of those being vaxed would be more than WWII numbers of deaths.
4.5 to 6 million have died, virtually all Muslims, people in all the usa illegal invasions of nations the usa has lied about since usa 9/11 lies falsely accusing OBL and Muslims in general. Here we have a usa Holocaust, larger in number than the Nazi Holocaust so why so much concern for these small in comparison deaths. All without CLEAR EVIDENCE.
The evidence that "vaccination" has killed countless people, and badly sickened countless others, is undeniable, as is now clear from an ever-growing number of scientific studies—studies as definitive as the evidence of US war crimes. (I will be posting several recent ones quite soon.)
On the other hand, the evidence in these reports of people "dying suddenly" is circumstantial, but quite compelling nonetheless.(There's a common misperception that circumstantial evidence is not admissible in court, although in fact it is.)
Your fantasy that there's a "lack of evidence" for the jabs' lethality appears to be related to your hobbyhorse re: US crimes against humanity. Apparently you want to think that the ongoing globalist depopulation drive is somehow less provable—and less horrific—than what you want to think the USA alone has done. That is, to put it mildly, a tendentious notion, and conveniently distracting from the Holocaust now going on worldwide.
Thus your fervent moralizing serves the globalist agenda. I'm sure that your collaboration is unwitting. In any case, your rants are taking up a LOT of space.
MCM: Your fantasy that there's a "lack of evidence" for the jabs' lethality
==============
I have NEVER said that, I have asked why none is presented here. I do NOT know what exists out there so why leap to this unwarranted assumption you have laid out.
If mine were "rants" they could be easily knocked down with evidence.
1. I anxiously await said studies, Mark.
2. MCM: "the evidence in these reports of people "dying suddenly" is circumstantial, but quite compelling nonetheless. TB: AGREE, needs more study. There must have been some so where is the evidence?
3. No fantasy at all, Mark. The total lack of any presented by anyone says some odd things. Even after I brought this issue up. One, why don't people just present the evidence? I don't for a moment believe that there aren't people deeply evil enough to cover up lots of deeply amoral things. This is the entire history of the usa, certainly not the only one but by far the world's leader in amorality. The usa shines as thee global depopulationist leaders. All solely just to steal others wealth.
Terry, 1. I don’t believe your statement for a second. 2. There is an obvious deliberate avoidance of studying the causes of died suddenly, cause unknown--almost exactly like the investigation into the cocaine found in the White House; TPTB don’t want to know why people are suddenly dying at abnormal rates.
3. You seem to think that the USA is uniquely evil, why is that? What is your background? You clearly have either not read Solzhenitsyn or don’t believe him where he says that the line dividing good and evil runs right through every man’s heart.
I find it curious that you put so much faith in’published studies, given the fact that there is a real documented problem (& I am not going to go hunt them up for you) with not only curated research ( studies designed to fail, studies designed to prove toxicity by deliberate over dosing), suppression/retraction of well done research that against the narrative, but actual fraudulent research (results fabricated/altered, research never actually done, but published as if it was done.
It seems to me, given those problems with the published literature, is at least as likely to be wrong as some collection of observations by random observers ‘evidence’ (which, btw, you have not deigned, to give us a definition of what constitutes evidence in your humble opinion).
Wm. F. Buckley famously said that he would rather be governed by a random collection (or it may have been the first ‘x’ number) of names in the Boston phone book than the Harvard faculty. I think that we have an analogous situation here, and I as well as most of the posters here are voting for the phone book list.
And your evidence he USA has killed 4.5-6.0 million Muslims is.....?
M William: And your evidence he USA has killed 4.5-6.0 million Muslims is.....?
========================
The usual usa actions like the Vietnam Holocaust where the usa did the equal of the world famous Holocaust which was tiny compared to the American Holocaust and the Black Holocaust. And the usa Korean Holocaust, Cambodian Holocaust, Laotian H, Indonesian H, East Timor H, Chilean H, ... .
"432,093 civilians have died violent deaths as a direct result of the U.S. post-9/11 wars. An estimated 3.6-3.8 million people have died indirectly in post-9/11 war zones, bringing the total death toll to at least 4.5-4.7 million and counting.
Civilians Killed & Wounded | Costs of War
The Costs of War | Carnegie Reporter Fall 2023
carnegie.org
https://www.carnegie.org › our-work › article › costs-war
Black Holocaust??? Really, Terry?
Help us with some statistics, ‘ evidence’.
Are you a moron or what. I gave you a bunch of hard statistical data that show at least 1 death per 1000 jabs and 1 in 100 injuries per jab. Go read prof. Rancourt research or prof. Fenton or kirsch here
https://kirschsubstack.com/p/data-from-us-medicare-and-the-new
If you still don’t get it you area a Pharma troll
Its interesting that you want to see evidence of the harm being done. I would ask where is the evidence that the jabs are effective at reducing covid and reducing mortality? Where is the evidence that they are safe? What normally takes 8 to 10 years to approve a jab was done in a matter of months? Why did pharma want to release their initial data in 75 years? My best friend is like you and I enjoy our discussions but cannot for the life of me understand how he cant see the obvious.
It is interesting that folks can't seem to address me directly, commonscents. We agree on virtually all you say but STILL no one has provided any evidence. I cannot for the life of me fathom being part of a mutual admiration society that eschews evidence. MCM has said some is coming. Why on Earth hasn't it flooded these pages since the query was first put forward?
What matters is freedom of choice. Freedom to refuse a medical treatment without losing one's livelihood. Do you trust pharma that was found guilty of harm and paid out billions as a result? Do you agree with "mandates"? That is what is illegal and unethical.
I suspect that you are asking these questions of me, Ty? Why are folks so cagey? I agree with the things you have said but that does NOT in any way change or negate my initial point. There is a paucity of evidence. The powers that be must be roaring in laughter at the "citizens" and their inability to even discuss issues rationally and fully, with evidence. They are saying, "Our brainwashing is doing super!!!"
This recently released video will kinda explain why the vaccinated will never "wake up". https://www.bitchute.com/video/U5RfZ1IJaKWC/
New Zealand Government Data Administrator who worked on Vaccine Payment System Exposes Shocking Data on Vaccine-related Deaths
https://www.aussie17.com/p/new-zealand-government-data-administrator
In a revealing interview with Liz Gunn, a New Zealand government data administrator identified as Winston Smith has come forward with startling claims regarding the consequences of the COVID-19 vaccine rollout in New Zealand.
Winston Smith emphasizes that he is not an anti-vaxxer. He clarifies that he has been vaccinated in the past and has even contributed to building the COVID vaccination system in New Zealand, which gave him access to the data , making it clear that his stance is not born from opposition to vaccines on principle.
Winston's findings on the mortality rates associated with various COVID-19 vaccine batches present a very concerning picture, suggesting a correlation that seems highly improbable to occur by chance alone. For instance, looking at the top ten batches with the highest mortality rate, he found the following:
For batch 1, out of 711 vaccinated individuals, 152 fatalities were reported, indicating a staggering 21% mortality rate
Batch 8, with a 17% mortality rate,
Batch 3 with 15% mortality rate
Even among larger sample sizes, such as batch number 70 that vaccinated 11,000 individuals, there were 498 deaths accounted for, representing a 4% mortality rate.
Such numbers vastly exceed the expected mortality rates which is 0.75% and with Smith's meticulous approach and diverse age distribution consideration, the suggestion that these outcomes are mathematically bordering on impossible becomes difficult to ignore.
Whatever Winston knows about the data surrounding vaccines he doesn't know much about humanity, which clearly ain't! The American Holocaust - 100 million Indigenous people slaughtered, the Canadian Holocaust, the aussie Holocaust, the kiwi Holocaust, all the Latin American Holocausts, all the uk Holocausts, ... .
All of the above still going on to this day and none of these massive genocides have been honestly addressed, fully acknowledged and dealt with in any actual honest manner.
The defining thread thru all of these Holocausts is White "christians".
Canadian Holocaust? Are you referring to the residential school mass graves that actually didn’t happen? Or the small pox infected blankets given out deliberately in the 1600s to natives by the Christian Quakers, despite no one knowing what smallpox was then, and they certainly would have had no way of protecting themselves from it even if it were possible to do this.
Yeah that was a mess. Ample room to criticize America and Canada but not that topic.
I see you zero in on the inane ideas/examples of those of the desantis ilk, William. AGAIN, not a shred of evidence.
==============
It was in pursuit of these and other grand visions that Jefferson later would write of the remaining Indians in America that the government was obliged "now to pursue them to extermination, or drive them to new seats beyond our reach." For the native peoples of Jefferson's "rising nation," of his "beloved country"-far from being Bolivar's "legitimate owners"- were in truth, most Americans believed, little more than dangerous wolves. Andrew Jackson said this plainly in urging American troops to root out from their "dens" and kill Indian women and their "whelps," adding in his second annual message to Congress that while some people tended to grow "melancholy" over the Indians' being driven by white Americans to their "tomb," an understanding of "true philanthropy reconciles the mind to these vicissitudes as it does to the extinction of one generation to make room for another."
Before either Jefferson or Jackson, George Washington, the father of the country, had said much the same thing: the Indians were wolves and beasts who deserved nothing from the whites but "total ruin." And Washington himself was only repeating what by then was a very traditional observation. Less than a decade after the founding of the Massachusetts Bay Colony in 1630, for example, it was made illegal to "shoot off a gun on any unnecessary occasion, or at any game except an Indian or a wolf." As Barry Lopez has noted, this was far from a single-incident comparison. So alike did Indians and wolves appear to even the earliest land hungry New England colonist that the colonist "fell to dealing with them in similar ways":
He set out poisoned meat for the wolf and gave the Indian blankets infected with smallpox. He raided the wolf's den to dig out and destroy the pups, and stole the Indian's children .... When he was accused of butchery for killing wolves and Indians, he spun tales of Mohawk cruelty and of wolves who ate fawns while they were still alive.... Indians and wolves who later came into areas where there were no more of either were called renegades. Wolves that lay around among the buffalo herds were called loafer wolves and Indians that hung around the forts were called loafer Indians.
As is so often the case, it was New England's religious elite who made the point more graphically than anyone. Referring to some Indians who had given offense to the colonists, the Reverend Cotton Mather wrote: "Once you have but got the Track of those Ravenous howling Wolves, then pursue them vigourously; Turn not back till they are consumed.... Beat them small as the Dust before the Wind." Lest this be regarded as mere rhetoric, empty of literal intent, consider that another of New England's most esteemed religious leaders, the Reverend Solomon Stoddard, as late as 1703 formally proposed to the Massachusetts Governor that the colonists be given the financial wherewithal to purchase and train large packs of dogs "to hunt Indians as they do bears." There were relatively few Indians remaining alive in New England by this time, but those few were too many for the likes of Mather and Stoddard. "The dogs would be an extreme terror to the Indians," Stoddard wrote, adding that such "dogs would do a great deal of execution upon the enemy and catch many an Indian that would be too light of foot for us." Then, turning from his equating of native men and women and children with bears deserving to be hunted down and destroyed, Stoddard became more conventional in his imagery: "if the Indians were as other people," he acknowledged, ". . . it might be looked upon as inhumane to pursue them in such a manner"; but, in fact, the Indians were wolves, he said, "and are to be dealt withal as wolves." For two hundred years to come Washington, Jefferson, Jackson, and other leaders, representing the wishes of virtually the entire white nation, followed these ministers' genocidal instructions with great care. It was their Christian duty as well as their destiny.
American Holocaust
https://www.thirdworldtraveler.com/History/Sex_Race_AH.html
This the first overtly self-inflicted Holocaust for sure. And European caused genocides are certainly the best documented
SY: And European caused genocides are certainly the best documented
======
That is the usual usa rank propaganda that does that. The worst in the world, the usa, are the biggest finger pointers.
Shake (your booty) yes, it is great! we have it all now Lets hope we can educate
NOW, the above appears to be, at least, an attempt at science/evidence and I congratulate Sheik Yurbouti.
It seems like the worst is just beginning to emerge.
If it is the worst.
I would like to hope this is the worst but I think the worst is yet to come. I personally believe tens of millions of people are going to die. I really hope I'm wrong but it's not looking this way at all. It's getting worse.
Yeah. It could go either way. But at this point it appears the worst is maybe just emerging. Cancers take time to develop. On the positive side, our immune systems are beyond understanding. They are gifts from God. Eventually they will prevail. How many die before our immune systems sort it out though?
I do believe we are in the last days. The world has never witnessed anything like this. We're seeing the one world government coming into power, one world currency, and we're witnessing the destruction of Christendom as well as the others. Most likely so they can usher in their one world Luciferian doctrines. We are also told many would die during this time. Our bodies are incredible at healing but He's the only one who can heal someone who has taken this poison. My belief is if God isn't done with you, you aren't going to die.
Revelation 14:6-12
The problem is our immune systems will never be able to sort out continual poisoning. If the bioweapon shots were outlawed tomorrow, our immune systems would have a chance to clear out the poison. But shot after shot after shot (and given to children) is like dosing someone with arsenic on the sly and waiting for the inevitable death of that person. The chemo effect of cumulative poison will ALWAYS destroy immune systems and lead to death.
We knew it all along. It was only a matter of 'when, not 'if'
Turbo Death from Turbo Cancers: “We’re in Trouble,” Says Dr. Ryan Cole
“We’re seeing young people get leukemias, and they appear in the emergency room. And they’re gone within a week.”
https://vigilantnews.com/post/turbo-death-from-turbo-cancers-were-in-trouble-says-dr-ryan-cole
Thinking....the booster uptake has fallen right off. Is it because they are now terrified.
most will never admit that they were wrong or -horrors- hoodwinked. So we are terrified for them.
My family hired a person to do a job, I told them from the get go he was a bad apple, for years I said to not use his services. The guy finally got canned from his job by the corporate entities.
Every so often his name will come up and I will hear "I am so glad he is gone" etc. And not one of them will admit that I was right even when I point that tidbit out to them. I get silence. He is a topic I have no qualms rubbing it in their faces.
The death vaxx is a little more sensitive of a topic to rub in their face, but the wind up is yes, they simply cannot admit they were wrong. Sheeple going in, Sheeple going out.
I basically said the same thing just a couple of minutes ago on another post. I really do believe it.
I wish I could get a sense of how many are seeing through this. I know many are. But is many 5%? Or 30%.
They may never speak of it, seeing how others have been treated, but booster uptake is well below 20%. 20% of us never took any, so the majority are seeing through the matrix of lies.
Dear Friends,
Even if I were not so dumb, perhaps educated in the science of medicine, and the inner-workings of the cell, it would seem to me that to introduce any un-natural foreign chemical or substance simply could hardly offer any advantage, and much more likely, confound the system's defenses. Enter: C-spike protein, and all the adjuvants associated, and if we have even correctly identified these to be the extent of what is being injected, can there be much doubt as to the ill-effects they create? Reading others' comments, it's difficult to disagree or doubt that such a lahar of anecdotal evidence is not scientifically valid. Using the analogy of identifying a "duck," one might say, If it walks, floats, quacks, looks like, flocks like, nests, eats and mates like a duck, then it's probably a duck! Likewise, if there is consistent evidence of circumstantial evidence being accumulated continuously it is most likely worthy of serious note.
But humans are unique creatures, and not robots. Weighted evidence is not, as we have seen, the end-all to the problem. People lie to themselves and trust falsehoods rather than face the uncomfortable truths presented in waves of logic accompanied by reliable evidence of illicit motives.
Bill Gates has OPENLY stated the intentional use of "vaccines" to reduce the population problem! And yet, almost half of the people still doubt it, even when obviated. It's very peculiar to witness all of this.
As a Christian "Fundamentalist," it has been far and above an easy thing to discredit the paradigm of the Atheistic world view. As the "duck" analogy dictates, when there is a concerted effort to disavow any evidence relating to the Truth as it is in the KJV Bible, then questions automatically arise. Just as in a murder trial, witnesses are examined and cross-examined thoroughly, and every shred of evidence (is expected to be) examined. But when scoffing and character assassination replaces jurisprudence, it leaves an evidence trail of it's own behind. This should be ample to suggest illicit posturing.
Again, humans gravitate toward comfort, and decidedly befriend a convenient lie rather than face off with the reality of things. One such reality; one which is with great difficulty ignored, highlights the existence of "evil." When all things are considered, the reality of such is overwhelming indeed. Contrarily, the "Good, Right, Just" side of the situation must then be acknowledged as well. If Satan; formerly "Lucifer" the "covering cherub" as per Genesis Account is a real entity, with powers (allowed by God) to wield against souls, then we best take note. We also best take note that we as humans are no match for his deceptive powers, and that our only hope toward Salvation, is in Christ the Redeemer.
As time moves forward, there will be seen evidences which formerly were not so clearly manifested. These will act as a wedge between Good and evil, begging the conscience to make a decision between the two. Worship and obedience to ALL the Commandments of God will dictate ones eternal fate, whether it be life or death. All the other distractions and delusions are to confuse.
Ray
I have no clue who any of these people are. I have heard the name Shannon Doherty, but I could not pick her face out of a line up.
It does seem NBC is going to be out of employees soon.
PLEASE SEND LOVE
TO:
THE FAMILY of FRIEND
OF/&, JJ COUEY.
IN PEACE
& SUCCOR.
Amen.
https://m.twitch.tv/videos/1994677301
---
https://www.wsws.org/en/articles/2023/12/01/fvil-d01.html. “Died suddenly”. Very sad and in a real sense tragic.
Darn blow-dryers claimed another one...
https://frontline.news/post/blow-dryer-blamed-for-malaysian-actress-sudden-death
I don’t see anyone surviving these injections. Just because they seem fine does not mean they are fine. We are going to have bury all of them.
US Vaccine Imperialism Backfires
Herman Tiu Laurel
2021, Phil-BRICS
48 Views
6 Pages
1 File ▾
Vaccines,
US Imperialism,
Coronavirus COVID-19,
COVID-19 PANDEMIC,
Sinovac
...more ▾
Show more ▾
It took me some time to ascribe as "imperialism" the US behavior on its vaccine promotion efforts, but after reviewing the course of events since the start of the Covid-19 crisis I found this as an inescapable fact-the US has tried to impose on the world its new vaccine development, its parameters for defining "efficacy" and its pernicious propaganda efforts at putting down other countries' vaccine projects. The US effort at pushing the vaccine into development reeks of the capitalist profit purpose, starting with the billions of Dollars from Trump's May 2020 "Warp Speed" to US Big Pharma that promptly pushed stocks prices and the Pharma executives went on shares selling sprees continuously since July 2020. US media simultaneously went on a hyped campaign of "95% effectiveness" or efficacy of the US mRNA vaccines which now emerges to be based on debatable data.
https://www.academia.edu/44954261/US_Vaccine_Imperialism_Backfires?email_work_card=abstract-read-more
https://t.me/DiedSuddenlyNews/5838
REMEMBERING BRANDY VAUGHAN - PHARMACEUTICAL WHISTLEBLOWER AND ANTI-VAXXER - MURDERED DEC 8TH 2020