The "liberal media"—and especially the New York Times—has now reached a new low in quasi-fascist propaganda, recalling the heyday of Dr. Goebbels and J. Edgar Hoover
How funny that Chris Bray just wrote a similar story and I'll make the same observation here that I did there:
The definition of "anti-vaxxer" includes people who are against government mandates. How many people are still IN FAVOR of mandates at this point? Ergo, the "anti-vaxxers" outnumber jab enthusiasts by A LOT.
Bobby Kennedy had a debate with Alan Dershowitz on the Jakobson case of mandated vaccination or a fine on the "valuetainment" podcast with Patrick Bet-David back in 2020
I agree with your definition of "anti-vaxxer". It's as valid as my definition of "anti-semite", which is anyone who says something that the ADL finds offensive.
My personal favorite is calling anything anti-Soros as "anti-semite", even though he literally worked with the Nazis to "appropriate" the wealth of "rehomed" Jews.
I loved the father and I love the son. History has a long arc. They say it bends toward truth and justice. I'm enough of a sucker to want to believe that.
His speech was powerful. Parts of it made me angry. Parts of it bewildered me. Parts almost made me cry, but I haven't any tears left. Parts of if made me afraid. I thought to myself, "They're going to have to kill this guy, too."
I feel like a battered, bloodied fighter, pulling himself up to his feet by sheer force of will, legs of rubber, arms of lead, trying to summon up the fire to throw punches his hands can no longer feel, staggering forward for one last, last round against the hometown giant, with the hometown ref and the hometown judges, where the only chance of victory is a miracle knock-out.
The definitive article disproving a link between MMR vaccines and autism was written by Dr William Thompson of CDC in 2004. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1586/14760584.3.1.19 Thompson subsequently became a whistleblower, who told Dr Brian Hooker, in a series of phone calls, that he (Thompson) had been instructed by his CDC boss to omit from the article many cases of autism that would have made a strong statistical case for a link. These conversations were recorded and published, with Thompson's permission, in a book called VACCINE WHISTLEBLOWER.https://www.amazon.com/Vaccine-Whistleblower-Exposing-Autism-Research/dp/1510727302/
To this day, most Americans believe that the link between vaccination and autism has been "rebuked", but in fact the evidence is strong, and strongly suppressed.
The movie VAXXED tells this story from the perspective of Andrew Wakefield who first reported that his juvenile patients were having digestive issues, then lapsing into autism after vaccination. Wakefield payed for his honesty by seeing his peer-reviewed article deleted and his medical license revoked. https://www.imdb.com/title/tt5562652/
Good article! These journalists appear to be utterly mendacious instead of merely being stupid.
""... He frames his criticisms as being about safety..."
Occam's razor would suggest that instead of running around 'framing' things for no reason whatsoever, he might actually be concerned about safety.
"...he did raise concerns about chronic illnesses, autism, quote, 'poisoning our children.'"
The scoundrel! We can't have people asking why Americans have such high rates of diabetes, obesity, mental health problems, and autism. As an immigrant I can tell you flat out that Americans are a train wreck in terms of health. For an advanced country to have growing problems with those conditions is astonishing, particularly when control groups like the Amish are available for study.
"The Kennedys’ belief in economic growth... enabling full and comfortable lives for all who work"
Notice how all of those progressives who used to care about the working class have absolutely nothing to say about the economic consequences of these insane lockdowns? We all saw the studies stating that most working class Americans can't summon up $500 in an emergency. All that went out the window pretty quickly, did it not?
I watched the 1 hr. 50 min. speech by RFK JR. I was not so concerned with what he did say. It was mostly a documentary about the history of his family. It is what he didn't talk about that bothered me. In almost 2 hrs. he never mentioned the issues most on American minds today. Digital currency, government created food shortages, the WHO's takeover of our country's sovereignty with the amendments to the IHR and the Pandemic Treaty, climate change (he has strongly supported this lie for years), inflation, abortion, the woke agenda, 1A and 2A of our Constitution. When you go to his website his PRIORITIES are lacking to say the least but his Environment priority is full of UN Agenda 21/Wildlands Project/Global Biodiversity Assessment buzz words that unless you are aware of these project you would fall for the warm and fuzzy but VERY dangerous to our freedom words. I have researched thee 3 agendas for 20 years and major red flags are in his Environment priority list. Kennedy is not what most conservatives are drooling about. A good humanitarian maybe but not going to be could for our country at this time in history.
Which "buzzwords" are those? That clip of his ferocious threat to jail the climate criminals is ten years old. Yesterday he tweeted his explicit opposition to exploiting climate change for any kind of lockdown. So what are you talking about?
The speech was crafted for a certain purpose. Hitting all the issues that most matter to yourself would not have suited the occasion, or its purpose. Meanwhile, he's been very clear about his stand on CBDC, the WHO and all the rest of it in his own podcasts. Have you watched them? If not, maybe you should.
I never mentioned that clip. So do not put words in my mouth that I never said. I also didn't bring up lock downs. This was his announcement speech and like most candidates during their announcement speech (his was longer than most) he never addressed the issues that are on the mind of American citizens. Yes I follow CHD closely, I have seen more interviews with and from Kennedy that I can count and I think he is a good man. But he is not what we need in the White House. If you know anything at all about UN Agenda 21/The Wildlands Project or the Global Biodiversity Assessment then reading his campaign website Priorities under Environment then you would have been able to pick out the words and phrases that indicate he is very much into the climate change lie. If you are not versed in those topics then perhaps you should be then you might be qualified to challenge me on the subject. Again, I admire RFK Jr. I just do not think he is what we need in the White House as President. Referring to the clip......I purposely did NOT mention it because until I am able to hear the entire interview it would be easy for them to clip out a segment and make it look like something it was not. So I have not shared it on my own Substack. BUT just because he said it 10 years ago (if he was truly talking about putting global warming deniers in prison (3 hots and a cot)) doesn't mean he still does not feel that way no matter what he says. During campaigns candidates say what they think will get them elected and they have been known to deceive the voters. RFK Jr. didn't just make the decision to run. I believe he has been thinking about it for a long time. Not saying he is doing that but also not saying he is not. We need to exercise discernment because our country will not last another 4 years if the right person is not elected. Saying all of that the bottom line abouT the election:. Can you you President Gavin Newsom?? They stole the biggest election in the history of our country in 2020 and they will do it again in 2024. Without honest elections no candidate that is fighting for America will ever be elected and that includes RFK Jr. and Trump. I believe the next President has already been selected and I believe it is Newsom. The left has fined tuned election fraud to a perfect science.
Hmm, do you see the "right person" around? Do you really think there is a "right person"? Seems to me RFKJr, despite his very human flaws, may be about as close as we can imagine at this point. Can you name the "right person", and how do you know if they are the "right person"?
Thanks. Yes I read it this morning. Slowly the truth about who RFK Jr. really is will come out. I personally do not think he is a bad person like the many sociopaths we have running things. I think he truly believes that climate change is real. That just makes him gullable and naive. Just like the woman that forced his to read the studies regarding mercury in vaccines and who convinced him he was wrong about the safety of vaccines we need a real expert to show him the evidence that he again has been lied to for years. If he continues to believe in this lie he will never get the nomination. And where does he stand on men in women's sports, abortion, digital currency, WEF, WHO, UN etc. etc. I watched his entire speech and what he said did not bother me as much as what he did not say and his campaign website is just as vague except for the UN Agenda 21 buzz words in his Environment platform. Anyone that has never done a deep dive into UN A21/The Wildlands Project and the Global Biodiversity Assessment would not pick up on the words but they stood out to me like a huge red flag.
I would add that people who have to agree 100% with someone else are trapped in dysfunctional cooperation strategies. You will never get anywhere by being a fanatic who demands 100% agreement.
That's one of the failings of the American traditional left. For instance, they refuse to engage with libertarians on a few issues that are of interest to both groups, including the militarization of police and imperialism. As soon as left wingers see that one of their pet causes is not of interest to another group, they will write that other group off as an enemy.
Let's say Kennedy is terrible on climate change and on supranational entities. Guess what, the RINOs in the Republican party are terrible on even more things than that... they continually screw their base over by failing to discuss the role of supranational entities, the campaign to vilify white Americans, the corruption in the US financial sector, etc.
He's the only one in the Democrat party who poses a real threat to the oligarchy that runs this country. Moreso than Trump, because at the end of the day Trump really didn't have a grasp on any of these issues.
"Kennedy is not what most conservatives are drooling about."
What exactly does that mean? Conservatives only drool over sports and Israel. They really don't have anything else other than those two issues and feeble protests over the latest progressive cause. For instance, they won't talk about central bank digital currencies, international trade agreements and supranational entities like the WHO, etc. They are wrapped up in the whole trans issue, while is borderline irrelevant to the big issues that you mention.
Besides, Kennedy is not a conservative. His party will rig the deck against him, but he can do a ton of damage to the corporatists/neoliberals on a whole bunch of key issues.
You need to read up on Martine Rothblatt. The "trans issue" is part of the trans humanism agenda. It's also a human rights issue. The same medical-industrial complex that made book on the plandemic is profiting off of medicalizing children who do not conform to gender stereotypes. No one can change their sex, regardless of what they do to their bodies. It's immoral and cruel to encourage a child to believe they can become the opposite sex. They cannot. Ever.
Listen to this doctor from Vanderbilt describe the wonderful business opportunity and steady income.
There are some conservatives that would vote for Kennedy if he emphasizes the middle class and reindustrialization of America, making the country a fortress and all that.
Also, emphasis on energy autraky is 100% attractive for conservatives.
No, he is explicitly NOT a climate change globalist. He says he is not--and is against the "green" globalist agenda. If you look at what he has stood for from the beginning, he is anti-pollution, for clean water, etc. In other words, he is for good stewardship of the earth, which we should all be able to get behind.
As soon as Kennedy announced he was running, Biden announced new environmental justice actions… an “executive order that the White House says will make environmental justice a central mission of federal agencies.
"Under this order, environmental justice will become the responsibility of every single federal agency -- I mean, every single federal agency,"
Right now, I think what we’re witnessing is Biden trying to win the vote of the climate change people… because he perceives Kennedy is a threat on that front.
I think it’s part of what we’re witnessing … head to head dem climate change battle
Mark, I think this is brilliant. You write from the heart and so well. And the attacks in the comments are fascinating. Are folks so insistent on negativity that they can't handle a brave, unity platform? Or are you over target sufficiently that the trolls are coming? Both?
There's a certain narcissism among our number, since people are so starved for affirmation of their stands that they want RFK to express them, loud and clear, even if it would be a moronic move politically.
And then there may also be trolls dispatched by CIA, or whatever other huge dog has an interest in this effort.
Jeff Childers has a really nice discussion about this in his post today. There are two bills in Florida that provide great health protections. There is strong opposition to one, simply because "we" put forth the other one. https://www.coffeeandcovid.com/p/moist-feet-friday-april-28-2023-c
Great way to show the absurdity of this Kafkaesque media.
It really is a crazy time and it's becoming so obvious that normal people are realizing it's rigged, that's a good thing... they're scared of the truth!
Just a few years ago, it was verboten to speak of the danger of the things, you know, the thing! It was ignored as crazy or kooky and that worked at the time.
But now?
I don't think so. That's why the wef had a big thing on the loss of trust... And their solutions to regain trust sound like the same crap the media follows.
They forgot that circumstances change.
That makes the programming that worked well before less effective, if not impotent.
With all due respect Mr. Miller, the reason I said what I said is because the entire political world is a psy-op in and of itself. It is all a circus, a scripted "scene " for the masses to "oohh" and "ahh" over. To divide & conquer. Not to mention how Bobby is in total favor of other poisonous vaccines, just not this one....seems a bit suspicious to me (although I personally do have a few ideas why that is). Also Bobby continues to "run away" from the whole "germ/virus theory " conversation. Why won't he talk about it? ?? I have ideas for that as well.
I am with you. It's the uniparty show and we get who they (the ccp) selects. And RFK JR interviews a lot of experts who have shared lots of non mainstream information and they bring receipts. Denis Rancourt for one...who illustrated via the all cause mortality death records that there was no epidemic that killed people but the measures. RFK knows this information. So many know this information yet they are still talking about the lab leak like it even matters. It's all different layers of horseshit.
Have you EVER read anything about the man? His name and his law firm have been fighting other vaccines for decades! Jesus. Go to Children’s Health Defense. Read just ONE of the books he wrote on the subject (specifically and preferably The Real Anthony Fauci).
Tucker only said what he was told to & allowed to say on air ! He wasn't going "rogue" as many people think. If he was, he would have been gotten rid of a long time ago. He also has his "masters" that he answers too as well, don't be fooled by the few "truths" he utters here & there......he is part of "the system/agenda" !!!
That's my point. Somehow he was able to say more than the previous gatekeepers. They are trying to keep hold of people by giving them more and more bits of truth.
The fact that you’re so dismissive of everyone’s completely genuine concerns, is very suspicious to me. Because of your responses here, I no longer trust what you say, and I did before reading the way you respond to people. You have become a snake if you weren’t already one before. Repent!
All these people who claim to be so aware & awake that are supporting ANY politician these days I personally now look at with a different opinion, including Jon. Not to mention how Jon himself for over 30 years has openly said he knows that "viruses " don't exist but now he is supporting Bobby who runs from that conversation
That's not the central issue. Getting people to believe "the virus" was invented—and/or that "viruses don't exist," but have been used to panic everyone into submission—is utterly impossible, as long as people think that those above us are benign. That they are NOT benign, but dangerous, is THE thing people need to understand, before we can discuss the question of virology.
Those of you who think that the ontology of viruses are ALL THAT MATTERS are distracting and dividing everybody else. Jon Rappaport should be commended for his realism and his open mind.
Me too. We know! Anyone who thinks that politicians are the answer has no clue what is happening. They all want control. RFK, Biden, Trump, DeSantis, they are all in it for themselves. Having a document that laid down the law was supposed to help with that, but now the Constitution is ignored and no one does anything about it. So what do we do?
Professor Miller, you wrote a very interesting article.
It is very disappointing, and disturbing, however, to see what the comment section devolved into following your post. I expected that there would be some thoughtful discourse about Kennedy's speech and about the Press. Regardless of what commenters think and feel about Kennedy, isn't some decorum called for?
I attended the speech in Boston and was fortunate to be in the credentialed room.
I purposely studied the press section in the back. Stoic, all. Maybe they were just being objective. ? In any case, I would say that 80% were under the age of 40. I realized that they did not have the personal experience, as I did, of having lived during the Kennedy administration and then the assassinations. I wondered what their perspective's were. I actually would have liked to interview THEM.
Ironically, I was interviewed by both CNN and by Beth Germano. I am assuming neither piece ran because I have a large network here in Boston and no one called to say they'd seen me. Perhaps I was too supportive.
No matter. It was an exciting day. I was delighted to meet so many folk from Children's Health Defense who I have been listening to every single day for 3 years.
Had I seen you, Professor Miller, I would have introduced myself, and thanked you.
I don't know how you and others do it - read the NYT and other msm. I don't have the physical, emotional or spiritual tolerance anymore.
I am a fully disillusioned citizen (as Atty. Dan Sheehan would say), and I expect I might be disappointed here and there in the next 18 months, but I am thrilled that we have a voice now. And I think it is going to get louder. I just watched the 3 hour round table discussion at Dartmouth College, April 26, available online and at CHD, with Kennedy speaking at the end. It encapsulates the past 3 years in an honest, open, heart-wrenching way. I really do think we might be seeing the opening of the curtains.
( I will be nitpicky, but just for the record - Kennedy actually did say "vaccine" one time in his candidacy speech. I noted it because it was just the one time. )
Great piece Mark, one of your best. In some ways, from the topics and people mentioned, it was like old home week.
Allard Lowenstein, Paul Wellstone, J. Parnell Thomas, George Sokolsky.
I always believed they took out Lowenstein and Wellstone. Al Franken the pompous little shit took Wellstone's seat.
Re McCarthyism, in the Warren Beatty movie "Reds", Maureen Stapleton played Emma Goldman, who tells Beatty's character John Reed that she realized Stalin was evil and all their friends, intellectuals, Jews, etc. were being rounded up and sent to Gulags. Their naive dream version of Communism was dead.
The people who considered themselves commies and socialists in the 20s, 30s, 40s, 50s, some were probably double agents, but most were reacting to the Depression, World Wars, unsafe working conditions and crap wages, and were looking for a way to better their fellow man.
Pete Seeger himself said if he had to defend his family he would take up arms, he was a humanitarian not a pacifist, and I think the people who "fellow travelled" came to realize they were duped. If you believe the cabal/deep state/freemasons etc. are really behind all the division and horror and suffering, then it's easy to understand how every good idea and cause has become co-opted and perverted. Like unions for example.
Dan Rather wow shouldn't he be in a home for CIA rat journalists?
He was in Dallas working for a newspaper when Pres Kennedy was murdered and gee just by chance CBS had him on air on the ground being interviewed by Uncle Walter Cronkite, another POS. And the next thing you know, Rather is at Black Rock at CBS in Manhattan as Cronkite's shiny new understudy. Year in and year out Rather would bring out his special on the assassination "proving time and again that Oswald acted alone" it was enough to make you puke. Rather should be hung up by his balls in GITMO and even that punishment isn't enough imo.
In 1968 the Dem Party was coming apart there was so much in-fighting. You had Be Clean For Gene McCarthy who was attracting the hippies if they weren't stoned all the time. LBJ quit and left Hubert Humphrey to clean up his mess. Humphrey was of course so lame with his dyed hair and uninspiring speeches. It was around then that Kissinger saw his chance and made a deal with Nixon and became a Republican. Before then he was friends with Eleanor Roosevelt when he was at Harvard, she created the Politics Dept at my alma mater Brandeis U., and there are photos of the two of them holding outdoor seminars on lawns under trees at Brandeis quite often. Kissinger imo only has allegiance to himself.
When RFK announced the McCarthy people were incensed and that was another rift.
Then of course there was the Chicago Dem Convention during which CT Sen Abe Ribicoff stood up and told Mayor Daley off--you're killing our children--as Abbie Hoffman and the Yippies and others who should at least have worn helmets were being beaten senseless by Daley's "pigs". I think Rather got roughed up on the Convention floor lol.
IMO having anymore elections and pretending there are 2 parties is a cruel joke.
I appreciate that RFK Jr may wake some more folks up, and that's really nice and everything, but if the system isn't corrected and the Dominion machines etc aren't stopped and destroyed, what is the use?
BTW Dershowitz has since changed his mind about the treatment of the unjabbed. What a guy.
I met him once at the bookstore at the Jewish Museum in Manhattan, Richard Dreyfuss was giving a lecture in the auditorium about his relative Captain Dreyfus of France who was sent to Devils Island mainly for being Jewish. We knew some people in common so I went up to him very politely and introduced myself and he couldn't have been nastier to me, it was quite a shock. I lived in LA for a while and was in the entertainment industry and met lots of movie stars etc. and they were all super nice.
I was quite taken aback by some of the nastier comments here, really uncalled for imo.
RFK Jr is apparently up for being the recipient of all kinds of abuse, from within his own family, and the Dem Party, as well as the MSM.
Maybe he's nostalgic for the good ol' days when his dad worked for HUAC on the Hill or when it was "Camelot", or when as Attorney General his dad went after the mob, good times. And no one ever fired J. Edgar Hoover, who loved to dress up in women's clothing and when he went to the race track at Santa Anita in California, his bets always won him lots of money from the mob guys who were running the betting. Or so I've heard...
Every doctor, nurse, pharmacist, hospital and clinic, every "health officer" around the world who pushed the jabs and masks and the mandates and took loads of $$ should be taken out. Period. And the people in their governments. Clean slate.
Isn't it a shame that anyone running for office still can't say what they they really want to say?
What does that tell you?
The swamp is indeed deep and it stinks.
At least RFK Jr can express why he is running. His Uncle Teddy back in 1980 was interviewed by Roger Mudd and Mudd asked him why he was running for President, and he went blank. Dead air. Dead campaign right then adn there too. Wow that was really something. Maybe Teddy thought it was so obvious he didn't need to think it through. Of course later he voted for both of the Patriot Acts.
They have given Andrew Bridgen got the boot for speaking out against the vaxx in the UK. If you aren't familiar there are some great Youtube videos of him. He is a fighter. They are going after everyone. RFKJr won't be safe either. It is sickening and mind boggling what is going on.
How funny that Chris Bray just wrote a similar story and I'll make the same observation here that I did there:
The definition of "anti-vaxxer" includes people who are against government mandates. How many people are still IN FAVOR of mandates at this point? Ergo, the "anti-vaxxers" outnumber jab enthusiasts by A LOT.
Bobby Kennedy had a debate with Alan Dershowitz on the Jakobson case of mandated vaccination or a fine on the "valuetainment" podcast with Patrick Bet-David back in 2020
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IfnJi7yLKgE
I agree with your definition of "anti-vaxxer". It's as valid as my definition of "anti-semite", which is anyone who says something that the ADL finds offensive.
My personal favorite is calling anything anti-Soros as "anti-semite", even though he literally worked with the Nazis to "appropriate" the wealth of "rehomed" Jews.
I loved the father and I love the son. History has a long arc. They say it bends toward truth and justice. I'm enough of a sucker to want to believe that.
His speech was powerful. Parts of it made me angry. Parts of it bewildered me. Parts almost made me cry, but I haven't any tears left. Parts of if made me afraid. I thought to myself, "They're going to have to kill this guy, too."
I feel like a battered, bloodied fighter, pulling himself up to his feet by sheer force of will, legs of rubber, arms of lead, trying to summon up the fire to throw punches his hands can no longer feel, staggering forward for one last, last round against the hometown giant, with the hometown ref and the hometown judges, where the only chance of victory is a miracle knock-out.
But he gets up off that stool.
Be strong and courageous!
“The Democrats are trying to HELP people...”. If they help me any more I’ll be destitute.
You Are Never Going To Believe
This:
My Car Got Covid.
I Think It Got Into The Air Filter.
Luckily, I Had Added
A Petroleum Based MRNA Product
To The Gas Tank,
Or It Might Have Died.
-That's What My Mechanic Said.
The definitive article disproving a link between MMR vaccines and autism was written by Dr William Thompson of CDC in 2004. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1586/14760584.3.1.19 Thompson subsequently became a whistleblower, who told Dr Brian Hooker, in a series of phone calls, that he (Thompson) had been instructed by his CDC boss to omit from the article many cases of autism that would have made a strong statistical case for a link. These conversations were recorded and published, with Thompson's permission, in a book called VACCINE WHISTLEBLOWER.https://www.amazon.com/Vaccine-Whistleblower-Exposing-Autism-Research/dp/1510727302/
To this day, most Americans believe that the link between vaccination and autism has been "rebuked", but in fact the evidence is strong, and strongly suppressed.
The movie VAXXED tells this story from the perspective of Andrew Wakefield who first reported that his juvenile patients were having digestive issues, then lapsing into autism after vaccination. Wakefield payed for his honesty by seeing his peer-reviewed article deleted and his medical license revoked. https://www.imdb.com/title/tt5562652/
Good article! These journalists appear to be utterly mendacious instead of merely being stupid.
""... He frames his criticisms as being about safety..."
Occam's razor would suggest that instead of running around 'framing' things for no reason whatsoever, he might actually be concerned about safety.
"...he did raise concerns about chronic illnesses, autism, quote, 'poisoning our children.'"
The scoundrel! We can't have people asking why Americans have such high rates of diabetes, obesity, mental health problems, and autism. As an immigrant I can tell you flat out that Americans are a train wreck in terms of health. For an advanced country to have growing problems with those conditions is astonishing, particularly when control groups like the Amish are available for study.
"The Kennedys’ belief in economic growth... enabling full and comfortable lives for all who work"
Notice how all of those progressives who used to care about the working class have absolutely nothing to say about the economic consequences of these insane lockdowns? We all saw the studies stating that most working class Americans can't summon up $500 in an emergency. All that went out the window pretty quickly, did it not?
I watched the 1 hr. 50 min. speech by RFK JR. I was not so concerned with what he did say. It was mostly a documentary about the history of his family. It is what he didn't talk about that bothered me. In almost 2 hrs. he never mentioned the issues most on American minds today. Digital currency, government created food shortages, the WHO's takeover of our country's sovereignty with the amendments to the IHR and the Pandemic Treaty, climate change (he has strongly supported this lie for years), inflation, abortion, the woke agenda, 1A and 2A of our Constitution. When you go to his website his PRIORITIES are lacking to say the least but his Environment priority is full of UN Agenda 21/Wildlands Project/Global Biodiversity Assessment buzz words that unless you are aware of these project you would fall for the warm and fuzzy but VERY dangerous to our freedom words. I have researched thee 3 agendas for 20 years and major red flags are in his Environment priority list. Kennedy is not what most conservatives are drooling about. A good humanitarian maybe but not going to be could for our country at this time in history.
Which "buzzwords" are those? That clip of his ferocious threat to jail the climate criminals is ten years old. Yesterday he tweeted his explicit opposition to exploiting climate change for any kind of lockdown. So what are you talking about?
The speech was crafted for a certain purpose. Hitting all the issues that most matter to yourself would not have suited the occasion, or its purpose. Meanwhile, he's been very clear about his stand on CBDC, the WHO and all the rest of it in his own podcasts. Have you watched them? If not, maybe you should.
I never mentioned that clip. So do not put words in my mouth that I never said. I also didn't bring up lock downs. This was his announcement speech and like most candidates during their announcement speech (his was longer than most) he never addressed the issues that are on the mind of American citizens. Yes I follow CHD closely, I have seen more interviews with and from Kennedy that I can count and I think he is a good man. But he is not what we need in the White House. If you know anything at all about UN Agenda 21/The Wildlands Project or the Global Biodiversity Assessment then reading his campaign website Priorities under Environment then you would have been able to pick out the words and phrases that indicate he is very much into the climate change lie. If you are not versed in those topics then perhaps you should be then you might be qualified to challenge me on the subject. Again, I admire RFK Jr. I just do not think he is what we need in the White House as President. Referring to the clip......I purposely did NOT mention it because until I am able to hear the entire interview it would be easy for them to clip out a segment and make it look like something it was not. So I have not shared it on my own Substack. BUT just because he said it 10 years ago (if he was truly talking about putting global warming deniers in prison (3 hots and a cot)) doesn't mean he still does not feel that way no matter what he says. During campaigns candidates say what they think will get them elected and they have been known to deceive the voters. RFK Jr. didn't just make the decision to run. I believe he has been thinking about it for a long time. Not saying he is doing that but also not saying he is not. We need to exercise discernment because our country will not last another 4 years if the right person is not elected. Saying all of that the bottom line abouT the election:. Can you you President Gavin Newsom?? They stole the biggest election in the history of our country in 2020 and they will do it again in 2024. Without honest elections no candidate that is fighting for America will ever be elected and that includes RFK Jr. and Trump. I believe the next President has already been selected and I believe it is Newsom. The left has fined tuned election fraud to a perfect science.
Hmm, do you see the "right person" around? Do you really think there is a "right person"? Seems to me RFKJr, despite his very human flaws, may be about as close as we can imagine at this point. Can you name the "right person", and how do you know if they are the "right person"?
https://newswithviews.com/why-not-rfk-jr-just-in-case-you-were-curious/
Thanks. Yes I read it this morning. Slowly the truth about who RFK Jr. really is will come out. I personally do not think he is a bad person like the many sociopaths we have running things. I think he truly believes that climate change is real. That just makes him gullable and naive. Just like the woman that forced his to read the studies regarding mercury in vaccines and who convinced him he was wrong about the safety of vaccines we need a real expert to show him the evidence that he again has been lied to for years. If he continues to believe in this lie he will never get the nomination. And where does he stand on men in women's sports, abortion, digital currency, WEF, WHO, UN etc. etc. I watched his entire speech and what he said did not bother me as much as what he did not say and his campaign website is just as vague except for the UN Agenda 21 buzz words in his Environment platform. Anyone that has never done a deep dive into UN A21/The Wildlands Project and the Global Biodiversity Assessment would not pick up on the words but they stood out to me like a huge red flag.
I would add that people who have to agree 100% with someone else are trapped in dysfunctional cooperation strategies. You will never get anywhere by being a fanatic who demands 100% agreement.
That's one of the failings of the American traditional left. For instance, they refuse to engage with libertarians on a few issues that are of interest to both groups, including the militarization of police and imperialism. As soon as left wingers see that one of their pet causes is not of interest to another group, they will write that other group off as an enemy.
Let's say Kennedy is terrible on climate change and on supranational entities. Guess what, the RINOs in the Republican party are terrible on even more things than that... they continually screw their base over by failing to discuss the role of supranational entities, the campaign to vilify white Americans, the corruption in the US financial sector, etc.
He's the only one in the Democrat party who poses a real threat to the oligarchy that runs this country. Moreso than Trump, because at the end of the day Trump really didn't have a grasp on any of these issues.
MCM, you did a remarkable job in preparing that essay. Spot on your analysis. Thank you so much.
"Kennedy is not what most conservatives are drooling about."
What exactly does that mean? Conservatives only drool over sports and Israel. They really don't have anything else other than those two issues and feeble protests over the latest progressive cause. For instance, they won't talk about central bank digital currencies, international trade agreements and supranational entities like the WHO, etc. They are wrapped up in the whole trans issue, while is borderline irrelevant to the big issues that you mention.
Besides, Kennedy is not a conservative. His party will rig the deck against him, but he can do a ton of damage to the corporatists/neoliberals on a whole bunch of key issues.
You need to read up on Martine Rothblatt. The "trans issue" is part of the trans humanism agenda. It's also a human rights issue. The same medical-industrial complex that made book on the plandemic is profiting off of medicalizing children who do not conform to gender stereotypes. No one can change their sex, regardless of what they do to their bodies. It's immoral and cruel to encourage a child to believe they can become the opposite sex. They cannot. Ever.
Listen to this doctor from Vanderbilt describe the wonderful business opportunity and steady income.
https://www.dailywire.com/news/huge-money-maker-video-reveals-vanderbilts-shocking-gender-care-threats-against-dissenting-doctors
Jennifer Bilek
https://freedomlibrary.hillsdale.edu/programs/campus-lectures/big-pharma-big-tech-and-synthetic-sex-identities
https://thefederalist.com/author/jenniferbilek/
https://jbilek.substack.com/?utm_source=substack&utm_medium=web&utm_campaign=profile_page
You forgot to mention abortion, which has been the defining issue for many on the right.
LOL!
There are some conservatives that would vote for Kennedy if he emphasizes the middle class and reindustrialization of America, making the country a fortress and all that.
Also, emphasis on energy autraky is 100% attractive for conservatives.
RFK Jr is a climate change globalist
https://newswithviews.com/why-not-rfk-jr-just-in-case-you-were-curious/
No, he is explicitly NOT a climate change globalist. He says he is not--and is against the "green" globalist agenda. If you look at what he has stood for from the beginning, he is anti-pollution, for clean water, etc. In other words, he is for good stewardship of the earth, which we should all be able to get behind.
As soon as Kennedy announced he was running, Biden announced new environmental justice actions… an “executive order that the White House says will make environmental justice a central mission of federal agencies.
"Under this order, environmental justice will become the responsibility of every single federal agency -- I mean, every single federal agency,"
Right now, I think what we’re witnessing is Biden trying to win the vote of the climate change people… because he perceives Kennedy is a threat on that front.
I think it’s part of what we’re witnessing … head to head dem climate change battle
At this point, RK only has to beat Biden.
brandon's exec order deputizes the entire fed bureaucracy to enforce un2030 diktat.
whereas rfk has an actual track record as an environmentalist.
not that the dnc would ever let him get as far as the nomination, after what they did to bernie
Mark, I think this is brilliant. You write from the heart and so well. And the attacks in the comments are fascinating. Are folks so insistent on negativity that they can't handle a brave, unity platform? Or are you over target sufficiently that the trolls are coming? Both?
Thank you. Good question.
There's a certain narcissism among our number, since people are so starved for affirmation of their stands that they want RFK to express them, loud and clear, even if it would be a moronic move politically.
And then there may also be trolls dispatched by CIA, or whatever other huge dog has an interest in this effort.
infiltrated indeed, sadly so. the verbal bullying is astounding :-((
mary-lou, be strong and courageous!
....of course ;-))
thnx, you too
Jeff Childers has a really nice discussion about this in his post today. There are two bills in Florida that provide great health protections. There is strong opposition to one, simply because "we" put forth the other one. https://www.coffeeandcovid.com/p/moist-feet-friday-april-28-2023-c
Kennedy’s in a tough spot. He has to be strategic in what he says and leaves unsaid, I imagine.
The Media just cannot do it’s part enough to deceive and kill it’s dwindling audience, can it?
Great way to show the absurdity of this Kafkaesque media.
It really is a crazy time and it's becoming so obvious that normal people are realizing it's rigged, that's a good thing... they're scared of the truth!
Just a few years ago, it was verboten to speak of the danger of the things, you know, the thing! It was ignored as crazy or kooky and that worked at the time.
But now?
I don't think so. That's why the wef had a big thing on the loss of trust... And their solutions to regain trust sound like the same crap the media follows.
They forgot that circumstances change.
That makes the programming that worked well before less effective, if not impotent.
https://robc137.substack.com/p/the-milgram-experiment-and-how-we
Good comment.
Sometimes you lose, sometimes you win, bad times don't last forever.
The story of Bronko Nagurski is a good metaphor to think about persistence of the truth...
https://youtu.be/K-IHxD_4JP0
The fact that any of "YOU" think this whole "election psy-op " is anything but is astonishing!!!
You'd prefer that all those issues NOT come up in this campaign? Or would that too be a psy-op? The fact that you'd dismiss it is astonishing.
With all due respect Mr. Miller, the reason I said what I said is because the entire political world is a psy-op in and of itself. It is all a circus, a scripted "scene " for the masses to "oohh" and "ahh" over. To divide & conquer. Not to mention how Bobby is in total favor of other poisonous vaccines, just not this one....seems a bit suspicious to me (although I personally do have a few ideas why that is). Also Bobby continues to "run away" from the whole "germ/virus theory " conversation. Why won't he talk about it? ?? I have ideas for that as well.
Try reading The Real Anthony Fauci and THEN come back and comment.
I am with you. It's the uniparty show and we get who they (the ccp) selects. And RFK JR interviews a lot of experts who have shared lots of non mainstream information and they bring receipts. Denis Rancourt for one...who illustrated via the all cause mortality death records that there was no epidemic that killed people but the measures. RFK knows this information. So many know this information yet they are still talking about the lab leak like it even matters. It's all different layers of horseshit.
Have you EVER read anything about the man? His name and his law firm have been fighting other vaccines for decades! Jesus. Go to Children’s Health Defense. Read just ONE of the books he wrote on the subject (specifically and preferably The Real Anthony Fauci).
Yep, he's bringing focus to things, just like Tucker did.
Obviously he won't tell everything but he's moving the Overton window...
CHD did it before he even ran.
Now he's got equal access to advertising, boom.
Tucker was/is another gate keeper
Yes, he is.
But he says things that previous gatekeepers could not.
That's a good sign of progress.
Tucker only said what he was told to & allowed to say on air ! He wasn't going "rogue" as many people think. If he was, he would have been gotten rid of a long time ago. He also has his "masters" that he answers too as well, don't be fooled by the few "truths" he utters here & there......he is part of "the system/agenda" !!!
That's my point. Somehow he was able to say more than the previous gatekeepers. They are trying to keep hold of people by giving them more and more bits of truth.
But they did get rid of him ….unless … that, too, was fake and …. part of their plan …
The fact that you’re so dismissive of everyone’s completely genuine concerns, is very suspicious to me. Because of your responses here, I no longer trust what you say, and I did before reading the way you respond to people. You have become a snake if you weren’t already one before. Repent!
This was a response to Mark Crispin Miller. We are awake, man, and we aren’t going anywhere.
Love your analysis MCM!!!!!!!!!
Have you read Jon Rappoport?
All these people who claim to be so aware & awake that are supporting ANY politician these days I personally now look at with a different opinion, including Jon. Not to mention how Jon himself for over 30 years has openly said he knows that "viruses " don't exist but now he is supporting Bobby who runs from that conversation
That's not the central issue. Getting people to believe "the virus" was invented—and/or that "viruses don't exist," but have been used to panic everyone into submission—is utterly impossible, as long as people think that those above us are benign. That they are NOT benign, but dangerous, is THE thing people need to understand, before we can discuss the question of virology.
Those of you who think that the ontology of viruses are ALL THAT MATTERS are distracting and dividing everybody else. Jon Rappaport should be commended for his realism and his open mind.
I agree with all.
I don't think that issue is all that matters.
absolutely. as a species we need choices and to be bullied into agreement goes against humanity.
Yes RAPE OF THE MIND is at work as usual.
Me too. We know! Anyone who thinks that politicians are the answer has no clue what is happening. They all want control. RFK, Biden, Trump, DeSantis, they are all in it for themselves. Having a document that laid down the law was supposed to help with that, but now the Constitution is ignored and no one does anything about it. So what do we do?
I understand your feelings.
Please go read this paid post of Jon:
https://jonrappoport.substack.com/p/perfection-disappointment-syndrome-fallen-idols
Rappoport is brilliant, both in style and content.
Yes. We agree. Everyone should read his posts.
Professor Miller, you wrote a very interesting article.
It is very disappointing, and disturbing, however, to see what the comment section devolved into following your post. I expected that there would be some thoughtful discourse about Kennedy's speech and about the Press. Regardless of what commenters think and feel about Kennedy, isn't some decorum called for?
I attended the speech in Boston and was fortunate to be in the credentialed room.
I purposely studied the press section in the back. Stoic, all. Maybe they were just being objective. ? In any case, I would say that 80% were under the age of 40. I realized that they did not have the personal experience, as I did, of having lived during the Kennedy administration and then the assassinations. I wondered what their perspective's were. I actually would have liked to interview THEM.
Ironically, I was interviewed by both CNN and by Beth Germano. I am assuming neither piece ran because I have a large network here in Boston and no one called to say they'd seen me. Perhaps I was too supportive.
No matter. It was an exciting day. I was delighted to meet so many folk from Children's Health Defense who I have been listening to every single day for 3 years.
Had I seen you, Professor Miller, I would have introduced myself, and thanked you.
I don't know how you and others do it - read the NYT and other msm. I don't have the physical, emotional or spiritual tolerance anymore.
I am a fully disillusioned citizen (as Atty. Dan Sheehan would say), and I expect I might be disappointed here and there in the next 18 months, but I am thrilled that we have a voice now. And I think it is going to get louder. I just watched the 3 hour round table discussion at Dartmouth College, April 26, available online and at CHD, with Kennedy speaking at the end. It encapsulates the past 3 years in an honest, open, heart-wrenching way. I really do think we might be seeing the opening of the curtains.
( I will be nitpicky, but just for the record - Kennedy actually did say "vaccine" one time in his candidacy speech. I noted it because it was just the one time. )
Thank you.
What a magnificent piece. It left me gasping for air. They take your breath away, these people.
This review is a masterpiece of the genre.
Thank you keeping honest reporting alive.
Great piece Mark, one of your best. In some ways, from the topics and people mentioned, it was like old home week.
Allard Lowenstein, Paul Wellstone, J. Parnell Thomas, George Sokolsky.
I always believed they took out Lowenstein and Wellstone. Al Franken the pompous little shit took Wellstone's seat.
Re McCarthyism, in the Warren Beatty movie "Reds", Maureen Stapleton played Emma Goldman, who tells Beatty's character John Reed that she realized Stalin was evil and all their friends, intellectuals, Jews, etc. were being rounded up and sent to Gulags. Their naive dream version of Communism was dead.
The people who considered themselves commies and socialists in the 20s, 30s, 40s, 50s, some were probably double agents, but most were reacting to the Depression, World Wars, unsafe working conditions and crap wages, and were looking for a way to better their fellow man.
Pete Seeger himself said if he had to defend his family he would take up arms, he was a humanitarian not a pacifist, and I think the people who "fellow travelled" came to realize they were duped. If you believe the cabal/deep state/freemasons etc. are really behind all the division and horror and suffering, then it's easy to understand how every good idea and cause has become co-opted and perverted. Like unions for example.
Dan Rather wow shouldn't he be in a home for CIA rat journalists?
He was in Dallas working for a newspaper when Pres Kennedy was murdered and gee just by chance CBS had him on air on the ground being interviewed by Uncle Walter Cronkite, another POS. And the next thing you know, Rather is at Black Rock at CBS in Manhattan as Cronkite's shiny new understudy. Year in and year out Rather would bring out his special on the assassination "proving time and again that Oswald acted alone" it was enough to make you puke. Rather should be hung up by his balls in GITMO and even that punishment isn't enough imo.
In 1968 the Dem Party was coming apart there was so much in-fighting. You had Be Clean For Gene McCarthy who was attracting the hippies if they weren't stoned all the time. LBJ quit and left Hubert Humphrey to clean up his mess. Humphrey was of course so lame with his dyed hair and uninspiring speeches. It was around then that Kissinger saw his chance and made a deal with Nixon and became a Republican. Before then he was friends with Eleanor Roosevelt when he was at Harvard, she created the Politics Dept at my alma mater Brandeis U., and there are photos of the two of them holding outdoor seminars on lawns under trees at Brandeis quite often. Kissinger imo only has allegiance to himself.
When RFK announced the McCarthy people were incensed and that was another rift.
Then of course there was the Chicago Dem Convention during which CT Sen Abe Ribicoff stood up and told Mayor Daley off--you're killing our children--as Abbie Hoffman and the Yippies and others who should at least have worn helmets were being beaten senseless by Daley's "pigs". I think Rather got roughed up on the Convention floor lol.
IMO having anymore elections and pretending there are 2 parties is a cruel joke.
I appreciate that RFK Jr may wake some more folks up, and that's really nice and everything, but if the system isn't corrected and the Dominion machines etc aren't stopped and destroyed, what is the use?
BTW Dershowitz has since changed his mind about the treatment of the unjabbed. What a guy.
I met him once at the bookstore at the Jewish Museum in Manhattan, Richard Dreyfuss was giving a lecture in the auditorium about his relative Captain Dreyfus of France who was sent to Devils Island mainly for being Jewish. We knew some people in common so I went up to him very politely and introduced myself and he couldn't have been nastier to me, it was quite a shock. I lived in LA for a while and was in the entertainment industry and met lots of movie stars etc. and they were all super nice.
I was quite taken aback by some of the nastier comments here, really uncalled for imo.
RFK Jr is apparently up for being the recipient of all kinds of abuse, from within his own family, and the Dem Party, as well as the MSM.
Maybe he's nostalgic for the good ol' days when his dad worked for HUAC on the Hill or when it was "Camelot", or when as Attorney General his dad went after the mob, good times. And no one ever fired J. Edgar Hoover, who loved to dress up in women's clothing and when he went to the race track at Santa Anita in California, his bets always won him lots of money from the mob guys who were running the betting. Or so I've heard...
Every doctor, nurse, pharmacist, hospital and clinic, every "health officer" around the world who pushed the jabs and masks and the mandates and took loads of $$ should be taken out. Period. And the people in their governments. Clean slate.
Isn't it a shame that anyone running for office still can't say what they they really want to say?
What does that tell you?
The swamp is indeed deep and it stinks.
At least RFK Jr can express why he is running. His Uncle Teddy back in 1980 was interviewed by Roger Mudd and Mudd asked him why he was running for President, and he went blank. Dead air. Dead campaign right then adn there too. Wow that was really something. Maybe Teddy thought it was so obvious he didn't need to think it through. Of course later he voted for both of the Patriot Acts.
And so it goes...
Thanks for sharing!
my pleasure
They have given Andrew Bridgen got the boot for speaking out against the vaxx in the UK. If you aren't familiar there are some great Youtube videos of him. He is a fighter. They are going after everyone. RFKJr won't be safe either. It is sickening and mind boggling what is going on.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hAXb6ftT7Kc
I really like Bridgen.