Kagan, Jackson seemed to share the doubts of the conservative majority as to this latest "liberal" effort to condemn both Trump and those Americans who'd vote for him to "civil death"
So you're saying that she wasn't really shot and was not killed? What evidence do you have that supports this conclusion?
I also believe J6 was an inside job, planned by the Dem's and the FBI (the Dem's very own police force) to bring down Trump, but had no idea they staged the shooting and death of Babbitt.
Hi Kevin I read that Ashley's family is suing the government for 3 million dollars for her death. So how can this be verified? I'm just asking a question here because I would like to know.
If you read more of Mathis' writings (caution: his catalogue is huge) you'll find grifting is a family affair. Sandy Hook and the Boston Marathon smoke bombing offer classic examples of massive family grifts.
Beware Mathis and his cult. Decide for yourself, of course, but he seems to me to over rely on sweeping statements about individuals and motives based on little more than association or family relation, and through all his conspiracy hypothesizing there is a consistent reduction or refrain to 'the jews did it,' that renders the use of his work problematic, at least. His followers are oddly devoted, (almost bot-like?), and I've noticed lately a resurgence of their ranks commenting on substacks recently singing his praises, after a long silence/absence from them (in the blogs I read anyway.) They just cropped up recently enticing Mathew Crawford at Rounding the Earth to seek clarity in Miles' catalogue, and he appears to have found some appeal in him. Mathis is also in the habit of deciding which dissidents pass his purity test, discrediting some of the great researchers in the conspiracy realm, for instance the late Dave McGowan without any strong arguments to support & in contradiction to McGowan's obvious commitments to seeking truth. If he's not controlled opposition, as someone constantly pointing the controlled opposition finger, then the powers that be are getting a great deal by not paying him. I'll leave it at that. Maybe I'm wrong.
"Several Democratic Congresspeople and many other paid talking heads have compared the January 6 “Attack on the Capitol” to Pearl Harbor and 911. Which is true: like those events, the events of January 6 were staged by your government."
I recently read book called "Hold the Line: The Insurrection and One Cop's Battle for American's Soul. Officer Michael Fanone details all what went down on Jan 6th. So thankful he wore his body camera to record all what happened and it was horrible. It's amazing he survived the terrible injuries inflicted on him. I wanted to know the full truth of what actually happened that fateful day. I couldn't keep this book down. Michael Fanone stated he never expected the President of the United States to incite a mob to attack the U.S. Capitol as part of a coup to overturn a legitimate election. This was a planned attack and Trump should be arrested and jailed as he was bait to his supporters. Everyone, including all police officers should read this book.
I disagree with much of what you have said, but in particular, Trump did not incite the mob. He told people to go home. Eye witness reports on that. Also, many people believe that election was NOT legitimate.
If this could be done to an arguable "conservative", in a largely conservative country... What would that mean for a candidate from the left?
I had several (left) journalist friends on the grounds of the Capitol that day... All had been present at comparatively tiny protests over the previous weekend (Action for Assange/#ForceTheVote - against Pelosi/for bringing Healthcare for all, to the floor for a vote) - with lopsided law enforcement presences, dwarfing those of the demonstrators. THEY could see, that January 6th was a complete set-up, even while it was happening. They saw the dearth of Cops and Back-up present, and knew right away. They also saw that 99.9% assembled for a peaceful/permitted protest were engaged in anything but an "insurrection".
This was a good result, but do not forget how monumentally terrible, and dishonest the decision to uphold the vaccine mandate for healthcare workers in Biden v. Missouri, a decision few paid attention to because they were too busy celebrating the "win" vs.OSHA
Sometimes the law is just too obvious to flaunt; it does not make the SC allies.
Kavanaugh and Roberts, two "conservative" judges joined Kagan, Sotomayor and Jackson in the per curiam decision which was abysmal at best.
For starters, they cited two verifiable falsehoods about the vaccine:
• "spread is more likely when healthcare workers are unvaccinated"
• "a COVID–19 vaccine mandate will substantially reduce the likelihood that healthcare workers will contract the virus (reiterating) and transmit it to their patients."
In August 2022, we knew both of these claims to be unequivocally false.
The majority also found that prior infection had been taken into account, and upheld the ruling that natural immunity did not exempt healthcare workers from the mandate.
They did not do this and it's obvious.
The science was and always has been unequivocal that prior infection is durable, long-lasting and much more effective than the vaccine at preventing transmission or being infected.
Why is it so obvious that prior infection was not considered?
Because the vaccines do neither.
What legal institution could possibly have greater access to medical information than the Supreme Court of the United States? The only logical conclusion is that they are either lying or stupid. I think Supreme Court justices are not stupid.
That's not all. Not even close.
The majority also cited "vaccination requirements are a common feature of the provision of healthcare in America," and that "healthcare workers and public-health organizations overwhelmingly support" the requirement."
So the fvck f👑 what? The ubiquity or popularity of an issue has no litigious quality with regards to the constitutionality of a law or mandate, or anything the Supreme Court hears. It's a child's reasoning.
And for the most absolutely f👑 preposterously, unfathomably absurd reason, they agreed that "fear of exposure” to the virus “from unvaccinated health care staff can lead patients to themselves forgo seeking medically necessary care,” creating a further “ris[k] to patient health and safety.
They literally used someone's fear of another as precedent for mandating an experimental drug manufactured by criminals.
The Supreme Court of the United States used falsehoods and juvenile reasoning to enforce unconstitutional medical mandates. Don't forget that while you're owning the libs.
IMO it's part of it; a very important part, giving the masses the illusion that they count, and can actually have an effect on the direction society takes. I'm not sure of the "fitness" of this, but the Hegelian Dialectic seems to be applied wherein the "Thesis" being one party, squares off with the opposing party: ie the "Anti-thesis, the two find "center" and the outcome is the "synthesis" which was the goal all along. This is how social control has been instituted by the Jesuit trained professionals and politicians. They created the "left and right" to direct the trajectory of their intensions. Seems complicated, but logical. Difficult for my ability to wrap around.
So what kind of government would you prefer? Here's a novel thought: How about an electoral democracy in which elections ARE decided by the will of the electorate?
I read on one of these substacks that real democracy is two wolves and a lamb voting on what to have for dinner. Mob rule? Part of the problem is limiting who can really run for office through the use of arcane rules to even get on the ballots, not to mention the vast amounts of $$ it takes to run. Those with the corporate/monied interests backing get the lion's share of attention which creates the illusion that it was a free and open election.
that's a right wing talking point that's been floating for a few months now. this line of thought is being used in my state to attempt to amend the state constitution so that voters cannot vote on amendments, rather, only state reps can vote on amendments. we already have protections in place for the "lamb" in your scenario - bill of rights, etc. that's why it's so important we don't toss them aside during pandemics etc
I saw during the "pandemic" what mob rule is. The majority wanted everyone to get the jabs and wanted anyone who didn't to be punished in some way whether is was to deny them healthcare, deny them their ability to make a living, deny them their bill of rights. I am grateful I was retired already and didn't have to lose my job because of the majority's demands. In the end, fear rules and people make a lot of stupid, harmful decisions when they are afraid. Maybe if people were more informed, they could make better choices but the MSM and those currently running the show aren't allowing that. I really don't see a solution.
Judas Pence ran Warp Speed. Fauci was the Covid dictator. Trump made the monoclonal antibodies free and available and told everyone not to worry about covid and to get back to normal asap. Unfortunately, he is not in the field of medicine or public health and he let the same people who threw him under the bus advise him about covid. Trump said "you can't force anyone to take a vaccine." He didn't mandate the jab. He wanted the country to completely reopen and get back to normal asap. Comrade Biden is the one who forced the kill shot on everyone. Most people who refused the shot were patriots who defend freedom and personal liberty and voted for Trump. Everyone had the power to make their own choice and refuse the jab.
Trump was Commander in Chief when he lost his presidency to a global coup d’etat and, because Operation Warp Speed comes directly from the military is responsible for its administration, which had cost tens of thousands of lives.
Do I tolerate presidents that kill their own people?
———>>>> no I do not
Trump is a monumentally stupid and corrupt human being, but he did make the correct analogy when he compared OWS to nuclear weapons:
“ When President Trump unveiled Operation Warp Speed in May, he declared that it was “unlike anything our country has seen since the Manhattan Project.”
He called the jab "HIS big beautiful shot". He was very proud of it. He only changed his mind when the crowds at his rallies were booing him when he told people to get the shot. I agree with S.2 that "Trump is a monumentally stupid and corrupt human being."
Get over it. That was due to the fog of war. Trump was not aware of the depth of corruption in our federal agencies when he was elected in 2016, surprising even himself. That first term uncovered so much dirt and so many compromised traitors in the government and his own administration that he is much wiser now. Add to that all that has been revealed in the last three years under Biden and you must see that Trump and his team of freedom fighters are in a very different position now, and would make very different decisions. He, and they, present the biggest threat to the Deep State, to wit the endless lawfare and propaganda leveled against him.
Get over what? That he committed the highest treason against the people of the United States of America. He had months to resign, instead he doubled down on the support of the Covid agenda- he’s the perfect putty in the hands of the WEF.
From Sept 2023:
Former President Donald Trump is defending his handling of the COVID-19 pandemic, including sticking with Dr. Anthony Fauci and pushing vaccines.
In a contentious interview with conservative host Megyn Kelly, Trump mounted an unusual pushback against right-wing critics who say he was too chummy with Fauci and too gung-ho about developing vaccines.
“ People say, ‘You saved 100 million lives,'” Trump said.
I really think Trump supporters may be the stupidest demographic out there.
You really need to read Scott Atlas's book about what went on in the White House during COVID. He was called in to advise and nearly lost his mind. Between Pence, Birx, Fauci and Jared, Trump (with his lack of savvy and basic knowledge) never stood a chance. He was completely railroaded. Not that it excuses him in any way--the buck stops with him, obviously, and the worst thing is he can't admit it to himself. But it is more complex than you think.
Like I said earlier Trump had months to resign, instead he made the whole thing possible and has continued to brag about “saving lives” and being the “father” of the vaccine:
“ Former US president Donald Trump has claimed that he is “the father of the vaccine” for coronavirus, attacking his successor Joe Biden for taking credit for the much-improved US response to the crisis.”
Yes, his claims are ridiculous, but you keep saying "he had months to resign." WTF? Are suggesting he should have resigned before his term was up? That he somehow did not leave at the end of his term? What is your point here? I agree that Trump is a bad choice and I'd never vote for him anymore than I'd vote for Biden (who is a much more malign force IMO), but why is it any stupider to vote for Trump than to vote for Biden?
I never said Biden was any better or worse than Trump- I said elections are fake and I said that Trump should have resigned because he lost control of the country.
I was quite enthusiastic about Kennedy until he managed to vitiate his entire platform with his sophomoric and ignorant response to 10/7. Even then if he had shown the slightest inclination to become better informed as time went on I would have given him a break, but he has shown himself to be no better than Trump or Biden--completely captured by a foreign entity that has shown itself to be deeply dishonest and barbaric.
he had RFK's phone number the first time and didn't use it. he had lots of advisers he could have reached out to. he trusted fauci instead. fauci, the king of the swamp.
despite all his rhetoric, trump got PLAYED by the swamp. looks like he'll win again - and he'll be better than biden in many ways - but he'll get played again, too. and we will all pay.
I don’t disagree with many of your points but I do disagree that trump supporters ( me being one of them) are stupid. We have binary choices. That is our system. Only one person can be President. Personally, I don’t think we should allow ANYONE to tell us what to do, not a president et, not a legislature, not a city council, not a cop, and so on. As far as I am concerned, government’s ONLY role is to protect the inhabitants of that town or village or tribe or family or nation from invaders. Nothing else. Government should not be dictating a fingernail’s worth of mandates or bans to any individual.
You definitely have a choice not to vote and to keep reminding people of what happened in 2020 and under whose administration it happened.
This whole ballot stuff is a way for “them” to demoralise those of us who still have principles, integrity and intelligence to differentiate between good and evil, right and wrong. American elections are psychological torture.
What was the last election that you voted for a president? I always find myself voting against a candidate (now party).
Honestly.... jojo the hair sniffer is the better actor/stuntman... got everyone fooled he's brain dead and can't walk or ride bike without falling...why has he never been injured in any of these stunt's??(uh I mean accidents...LOL) Most people his age, that hit the deck, break bones!? He reminds me of the mob boss; Vinny "the Chin" Gigante who wandered the streets of Greenwich Village in his bathrobe and slippers, mumbling incoherently to himself, to get an insanity plea.
As for our vote/ballots.....two words come to mind....Electoral College
It's all a rich mans game....
Don't let your instinctual tribalism rule your thoughts.
Absolutely agree S.2. Both parties are one and the same and run by the same predatory globalists who we never elected. They get to choose who they want for next President before we go vote at the polls. My husband and I no longer vote in these Presidential elections knowing what we know as our votes no longer count and we don't want to give them any credibility. Actually, since the stolen 2020 election was never resolved, why should we even continue to vote? And why would it be any different this 2024 election? They don't work for us.
No need to be sad anymore..: but feelings are feelings and they deserve to be felt. What “they” want is for us to emote, not rationally apprise the situation… 🙏🏽
"fog of war" - 4 years later he is still promoting the jab, still has not acknowledged a single jab injury or death. boy that's a pretty thick fog. and it's apparently only hovering over his head specifically, like Linus from peanuts i suppose.
what a nonsense argument. trump had plenty of advisers, including a very willing RFK Jr, who would have walked him through it. he ignored them. total lack of discernment, which is the most important leadership quality. he got PLAYED. he's going to drain the swamp??? yeah right. he stood right next to the king of the swamp (fauci) for like 100 different press conferences, didn't do anything to stop him.
If he is much wiser then why he is toting Sea Island Resort Tim Scott around w/him? I am pretty tired of hearing 3D chess, keep your enemies closer, and all the other cute excuses. What gives w/Scott? Trump should not have that guy anywhere near him.
I know, he's a very imperfect vessel. But he's what we've got. I do feel that most of the snakes and RINOs have been shaken out of his camp in the last few years, but still he will need the counsel and advice of clear-seeing allies like Steve Bannon and Roger Stone and Tucker Carlson to make the full house-cleaning of Washington happen.
Trump was very aware of the corruption in our govt. When he was elected, he was surrounded by DS swamp. Did he get rid of the swamp? NO Was Hillary arrested for her many crimes? NO I could go on, but sorry to say Trump is PART of the SWAMP.
In the 90's, Rothschild Banker Wilbur Ross bailed out Trump when he failed to pay back the high-interest loans he had taken out to build his casino empire. So, when he got elected he paid back the favor by picking Ross to be his Commerce Secretary.
Poor, poor Donald. Let's give him another chance to blow his mouth off for the cameras and the suckers while he pompously and blissfully floats through the next 4 years,, too ignorant and impotent to steer this government.
I’m just trying to grapple how people could be so stupid as to support someone like Trump. They claim to be “patriots” but are guilty of aiding in the destruction of the country.
Not sure exactly what you mean… do I have Trump derangement syndrome? I’m pretty sure that in a sane universe he wouldn’t be near any position of power. Alas…
“ As democracy is perfected, the office of president represents, more and more closely, the inner soul of the people. On some great and glorious day the plain folks of the land will reach their heart's desire at last and the White House will be adorned by a downright moron.“
I can’t remember a son in law having such a prominent role in any other administration… I’ll have to jog my memory… he was the Senior Advisor to Trump and The Office of American Innovation (OAI) was an office within the White House Office created by the Trump administration on March 27, 2017
The purpose of the office was to "make recommendations to the President on policies and plans that improve Government operations and services, improve the quality of life for Americans now and in the future, and spur job creation."[2]
The Office was directed by President Trump’s son-in-law Jared Kushner,[3][4][5] Senior Advisor to the President.
The scamdemic was/is a revolution into a technocracy if I’m not mistaken… it looks like he played set up for it in some way or another
“ When a dozen and a half CEOs of the world’s biggest tech companies descended on the White House last month, it turned a spotlight on one of the bigger mysteries of a mysterious White House: They were convened by the Office of American Innovation, the new operation being run by presidential son-in-law Jared Kushner. Announced with much fanfare by the president in March, the office was set up to bring “new thinking and real change” to the country’s toughest problems, according to Trump, in part by drawing on the lessons of the private sector.”
Actually while it may not appear so on the surface now we are headed for a theocracy more than a technocracy. The church will control the state and implement the Sunday mark.
"An thou swearest by that that is not, thou art not forsworn." Meaning, in this case, that you can't be guilty of participating in an insurrection if there WAS no insurrection. And there WAS no insurrection. A protest, yes. A riot? Okay. But I've seen bigger riots after a football game. The whole 14th Amendment angle was prima facie preposterous. Only a complete fool or a complete liar could pitch it with a straight face. I'll leave it to better minds to sort out who was which.
Now that what the democraps thought to be a mortal smear of invoking an insurrection has been finally put to rest what on earth will they try next ? Epstein photos or videos perhaps ? A feeble , dementia riddled psychopath versus a callous and bumbling buffoon is a stinging indictment of the adage that one gets the democracy they deserve
Well, not really. It's been decades since our electoral outcomes were determined by the will of the electorate. To fault the voters—and electoral democracy itself—for the serial theft of our elections by covert operatives is, to say the least, unfair.
I take a more cynical view in that the “epidemic” of apathy and ignorance towards those who treat us like farm animals will continue to do so until it becomes perilous for them to continue with their machinations
Someone like Pat Paulsen should change their name to Votey McVoteface and run for President.
Votey McVoteface would ideally be an attractive person of the ethnicity du jour, and always speak in a torrent of the most current language regarding the issues of the day but say precisely nothing, so as to make an effective mockery of the process as it currently exists.
OK....we should not vote for a "callous" and "bumbling" person because of....they are "uncouth" even if they are patriotic and care about the average citizen in words and deeds?
Even in your super-sarcastic descriptions you could not hide the difference between a "psychopath" who by definition is a criminal- he opens the borders, scurries out of Afghanistan leaving behind powerful weapons and FORCED the vaxx on us, VS a "rough" President who does not fit in the "cool" talk-show laughter.
You've touched on the great propagandistic lie : Trump is being unfairly persecuted not for his mostly lock step and fascistic policies ( Operation warp speed, The Cares act 2020 along with assorted bombings and assassinations of people "we" don't like ) but his inability to project a smooth and professional image in keeping with the PR machine of the empire. I go by actions and policies not image despite my truncated description of 2 of the worst presidents in modern history. If it gives you solace to remain on the Trump train and believe him to be America's savior than by all means keep enjoying the ride.
Computer programmer Clinton Eugene Curtis testifies in a Senate committee back in year 2004 about voting software he wrote that could flip any election 51/49 with whomever you wanted to win....you wouldn't know it without specific knowledge of the source code and/or the original votes that you could manually count. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JEzY2tnwExs (4 min)
Dr Shiva already lived through in-your-face election fraud where the ballot images were outright deleted by election officials while running for US Senate for Massachusetts that was admitted to and exposed in court discovery, along with collusion with big tech: www.WinBackFreedom.com . Shiva also uncovered similar "weighted" election voting software used that allows a hidden multiplier to be used against each group of voters; similar to a homeowners association where owner votes are weighted based on the square footage owned.
This Trump case is completely overshadowing real corruption of election fraud committed against Dr Shiva Ayyadurai .....and conveniently Shiva's 2024 presidential campaign. "They" really don't want Dr Shiva to get anywhere near a debate stage.
It's all theater. DJT will be the next hapless 'leader' installed as chief exec. He has been the deep states plan for the last 10 years. He will keep his little hands busy for the next 5 years doing their bidding and he will be the fall guy for the complete implosion of the American nation, just as Brandon has been the inept fall guy for the decimation of global American prestige . It's obvious and too sickening to watch.
As an Canadian following your politics for ever this is a fascinating case in democracy. I am utterly amazed that your democracy has devolved to this. From my perspective as a Canadian, regardless of what you think about Trump it has been a witch hunt from day one. Why does he so terrify the powers that be.
Disruption - the deep state is concerned that the usual money flows and payola might be impacted - when you realize American politics is just one big grift it becomes clearer.
I don't know why they are concerned. The grift never stops, no matter the "leader" or "president." There is nothing new under the sun. It has always been this way and always will be this way.
They ruled according to US law, which I admit, is an interesting change! I believe this is because the way is being cleared for President Trump by those who truly run this govt. Still, this was a correct, lawful ruling!
But man, you gotta wonder why they had to make an amendment to stop a person from being VOTED for who was convicted of insurrection, a purely subjective judgement by the people in power.
If that amendment was applied to the founding fathers, they would not be able to run for office for their "insurrection" haha.
And if the insurrectionist is such a bad guy, people will just not vote for him or her. But no, we needed a law to disqualify them,
Really freaking dumb.
They could have rigged a conviction so the banning would be legal. They didn't. They're dumb and lazy. We got the limp dick dystopia, not 1984 anymore.
Not dumb, petty: They were angry with the South and did not want a repeat. It was a short-sighted amendment, but they expected many confederates to be very popular with their local constituencies. It was not primarily concerned with the presidency, after all, but any elected office.
In short, they didn't want a repeat of what had just happened---or to have to sit in a chamber with Jefferson Davis being Minority Whip (no pun intended).
This ruling should be considered propaganda/manipulation. It was correctly decided according to US law but we need to ask why has the SC taken US law seriously on this case, while in most others, they utterly ignore it.
I go back to 2005-2007 when I could actually get incredibly good reporting from NPR. I could hear national and international opinion and news that NPR never presented before or after that time period. I believe this reporting was done for the purpose of electing Obama as it ceased as soon as he was elected.
For example I could hear anti war analysis until Obama was elected, then it stopped, full stop, and NPR was back to plugging war! NPR presented speakers who explained the illegality of torture. Full stop. Presidential overreach? Yes, then full stop. And so on.
The SC has made so many unconstitutional rulings where justices appear befuddled and unwilling to grapple with facts and logic. All of a sudden, they could think again, reason, knew the law. That is very strange. It seems like they are told what ruling they need to make and why. It bears thinking about why this ruling was lucid and lawful.
Citizen Free Press tweet "Kavanaugh makes it clear: “Trump has not been charged with Insurrection”"
The real question is, why have Pelosi & Co. not been charged with HOAXING Insurrection?
J6 was a scripted project from soup to nuts, led by Air Force intelligence.
http://mileswmathis.com/jan6.pdf
Is there any evidence of Air Force involvement? Certainly the FBI was (as usual) driving that charade of "terrorism."
Lots of Air Force agents both active and retired participated in the show that day, including Ashlee Babbitt whose shooting was also fake.
So you're saying that she wasn't really shot and was not killed? What evidence do you have that supports this conclusion?
I also believe J6 was an inside job, planned by the Dem's and the FBI (the Dem's very own police force) to bring down Trump, but had no idea they staged the shooting and death of Babbitt.
The referenced Mathis paper discusses it and then there's this:
https://www.bitchute.com/video/sBh1JE6KhoPz/
Based on the available footage, the whole shooting event is an obvious stage play, along with the rest of the events that entire day.
No, that's just dumb
Hi Kevin I read that Ashley's family is suing the government for 3 million dollars for her death. So how can this be verified? I'm just asking a question here because I would like to know.
If you read more of Mathis' writings (caution: his catalogue is huge) you'll find grifting is a family affair. Sandy Hook and the Boston Marathon smoke bombing offer classic examples of massive family grifts.
I know these were false flags in my estimation.
Seth Rich (?)
Yes - one of MM’s better current events papers IMO.
Beware Mathis and his cult. Decide for yourself, of course, but he seems to me to over rely on sweeping statements about individuals and motives based on little more than association or family relation, and through all his conspiracy hypothesizing there is a consistent reduction or refrain to 'the jews did it,' that renders the use of his work problematic, at least. His followers are oddly devoted, (almost bot-like?), and I've noticed lately a resurgence of their ranks commenting on substacks recently singing his praises, after a long silence/absence from them (in the blogs I read anyway.) They just cropped up recently enticing Mathew Crawford at Rounding the Earth to seek clarity in Miles' catalogue, and he appears to have found some appeal in him. Mathis is also in the habit of deciding which dissidents pass his purity test, discrediting some of the great researchers in the conspiracy realm, for instance the late Dave McGowan without any strong arguments to support & in contradiction to McGowan's obvious commitments to seeking truth. If he's not controlled opposition, as someone constantly pointing the controlled opposition finger, then the powers that be are getting a great deal by not paying him. I'll leave it at that. Maybe I'm wrong.
Marines - https://thehill.com/regulation/court-battles/4047244-active-duty-marines-plead-guilty-to-jan-6-charges/
Ukrainians - https://georgeeliason.substack.com/p/was-january-6th-violence-a-ukrainian
Miles is great.
"Several Democratic Congresspeople and many other paid talking heads have compared the January 6 “Attack on the Capitol” to Pearl Harbor and 911. Which is true: like those events, the events of January 6 were staged by your government."
And Epstein didn’t kill himself.
Guards were sleeping and the cameras didn’t work.
Right.
I recently read book called "Hold the Line: The Insurrection and One Cop's Battle for American's Soul. Officer Michael Fanone details all what went down on Jan 6th. So thankful he wore his body camera to record all what happened and it was horrible. It's amazing he survived the terrible injuries inflicted on him. I wanted to know the full truth of what actually happened that fateful day. I couldn't keep this book down. Michael Fanone stated he never expected the President of the United States to incite a mob to attack the U.S. Capitol as part of a coup to overturn a legitimate election. This was a planned attack and Trump should be arrested and jailed as he was bait to his supporters. Everyone, including all police officers should read this book.
I disagree with much of what you have said, but in particular, Trump did not incite the mob. He told people to go home. Eye witness reports on that. Also, many people believe that election was NOT legitimate.
lol bot
Enjoy the fog.
Nancy,,,,is that you????
Truth!
Also in the mix: Ft Bragg Army PsyOps, Proud Boys, OathKeepers, and various and sundry other players and state actors, including Ukrainians.
Great piece by Miles.
If this could be done to an arguable "conservative", in a largely conservative country... What would that mean for a candidate from the left?
I had several (left) journalist friends on the grounds of the Capitol that day... All had been present at comparatively tiny protests over the previous weekend (Action for Assange/#ForceTheVote - against Pelosi/for bringing Healthcare for all, to the floor for a vote) - with lopsided law enforcement presences, dwarfing those of the demonstrators. THEY could see, that January 6th was a complete set-up, even while it was happening. They saw the dearth of Cops and Back-up present, and knew right away. They also saw that 99.9% assembled for a peaceful/permitted protest were engaged in anything but an "insurrection".
This was a good result, but do not forget how monumentally terrible, and dishonest the decision to uphold the vaccine mandate for healthcare workers in Biden v. Missouri, a decision few paid attention to because they were too busy celebrating the "win" vs.OSHA
Sometimes the law is just too obvious to flaunt; it does not make the SC allies.
Kavanaugh and Roberts, two "conservative" judges joined Kagan, Sotomayor and Jackson in the per curiam decision which was abysmal at best.
For starters, they cited two verifiable falsehoods about the vaccine:
• "spread is more likely when healthcare workers are unvaccinated"
• "a COVID–19 vaccine mandate will substantially reduce the likelihood that healthcare workers will contract the virus (reiterating) and transmit it to their patients."
In August 2022, we knew both of these claims to be unequivocally false.
The majority also found that prior infection had been taken into account, and upheld the ruling that natural immunity did not exempt healthcare workers from the mandate.
They did not do this and it's obvious.
The science was and always has been unequivocal that prior infection is durable, long-lasting and much more effective than the vaccine at preventing transmission or being infected.
Why is it so obvious that prior infection was not considered?
Because the vaccines do neither.
What legal institution could possibly have greater access to medical information than the Supreme Court of the United States? The only logical conclusion is that they are either lying or stupid. I think Supreme Court justices are not stupid.
That's not all. Not even close.
The majority also cited "vaccination requirements are a common feature of the provision of healthcare in America," and that "healthcare workers and public-health organizations overwhelmingly support" the requirement."
So the fvck f👑 what? The ubiquity or popularity of an issue has no litigious quality with regards to the constitutionality of a law or mandate, or anything the Supreme Court hears. It's a child's reasoning.
And for the most absolutely f👑 preposterously, unfathomably absurd reason, they agreed that "fear of exposure” to the virus “from unvaccinated health care staff can lead patients to themselves forgo seeking medically necessary care,” creating a further “ris[k] to patient health and safety.
They literally used someone's fear of another as precedent for mandating an experimental drug manufactured by criminals.
The Supreme Court of the United States used falsehoods and juvenile reasoning to enforce unconstitutional medical mandates. Don't forget that while you're owning the libs.
Read the decision here: https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/22pdf/600us1r56_1o13.pdf
(Edited to remove repeated paragraphs).
Isn’t the whole theater about making people believe that voting can make a difference?
To me, it looks like only one of the diversions.
https://rayhorvaththesource.substack.com/p/this-war-of-attrition-is-based-on
IMO it's part of it; a very important part, giving the masses the illusion that they count, and can actually have an effect on the direction society takes. I'm not sure of the "fitness" of this, but the Hegelian Dialectic seems to be applied wherein the "Thesis" being one party, squares off with the opposing party: ie the "Anti-thesis, the two find "center" and the outcome is the "synthesis" which was the goal all along. This is how social control has been instituted by the Jesuit trained professionals and politicians. They created the "left and right" to direct the trajectory of their intensions. Seems complicated, but logical. Difficult for my ability to wrap around.
r
Also, voters can later be blamed for voting for the wrong side. Democracy is a criminal enterprise:
https://rayhorvaththesource.substack.com/p/what-about-democracy
So what kind of government would you prefer? Here's a novel thought: How about an electoral democracy in which elections ARE decided by the will of the electorate?
I read on one of these substacks that real democracy is two wolves and a lamb voting on what to have for dinner. Mob rule? Part of the problem is limiting who can really run for office through the use of arcane rules to even get on the ballots, not to mention the vast amounts of $$ it takes to run. Those with the corporate/monied interests backing get the lion's share of attention which creates the illusion that it was a free and open election.
that's a right wing talking point that's been floating for a few months now. this line of thought is being used in my state to attempt to amend the state constitution so that voters cannot vote on amendments, rather, only state reps can vote on amendments. we already have protections in place for the "lamb" in your scenario - bill of rights, etc. that's why it's so important we don't toss them aside during pandemics etc
I saw during the "pandemic" what mob rule is. The majority wanted everyone to get the jabs and wanted anyone who didn't to be punished in some way whether is was to deny them healthcare, deny them their ability to make a living, deny them their bill of rights. I am grateful I was retired already and didn't have to lose my job because of the majority's demands. In the end, fear rules and people make a lot of stupid, harmful decisions when they are afraid. Maybe if people were more informed, they could make better choices but the MSM and those currently running the show aren't allowing that. I really don't see a solution.
Thank you for asking. Your question inspired me to write a short article on the subject:
https://rayhorvaththesource.substack.com/p/what-kind-of-government-would-you
Why limit it to elections?
https://techno-society.com/
I’m truly shocked that anyone would vote for a man whose administration brought us Operation Warp Speed.
Judas Pence ran Warp Speed. Fauci was the Covid dictator. Trump made the monoclonal antibodies free and available and told everyone not to worry about covid and to get back to normal asap. Unfortunately, he is not in the field of medicine or public health and he let the same people who threw him under the bus advise him about covid. Trump said "you can't force anyone to take a vaccine." He didn't mandate the jab. He wanted the country to completely reopen and get back to normal asap. Comrade Biden is the one who forced the kill shot on everyone. Most people who refused the shot were patriots who defend freedom and personal liberty and voted for Trump. Everyone had the power to make their own choice and refuse the jab.
Trump was Commander in Chief when he lost his presidency to a global coup d’etat and, because Operation Warp Speed comes directly from the military is responsible for its administration, which had cost tens of thousands of lives.
Do I tolerate presidents that kill their own people?
———>>>> no I do not
Trump is a monumentally stupid and corrupt human being, but he did make the correct analogy when he compared OWS to nuclear weapons:
“ When President Trump unveiled Operation Warp Speed in May, he declared that it was “unlike anything our country has seen since the Manhattan Project.”
He called the jab "HIS big beautiful shot". He was very proud of it. He only changed his mind when the crowds at his rallies were booing him when he told people to get the shot. I agree with S.2 that "Trump is a monumentally stupid and corrupt human being."
Trump also said it was "SAFE".
He wasn't so stupid to take the beautiful shot himself.
Get over it. That was due to the fog of war. Trump was not aware of the depth of corruption in our federal agencies when he was elected in 2016, surprising even himself. That first term uncovered so much dirt and so many compromised traitors in the government and his own administration that he is much wiser now. Add to that all that has been revealed in the last three years under Biden and you must see that Trump and his team of freedom fighters are in a very different position now, and would make very different decisions. He, and they, present the biggest threat to the Deep State, to wit the endless lawfare and propaganda leveled against him.
Get over what? That he committed the highest treason against the people of the United States of America. He had months to resign, instead he doubled down on the support of the Covid agenda- he’s the perfect putty in the hands of the WEF.
From Sept 2023:
Former President Donald Trump is defending his handling of the COVID-19 pandemic, including sticking with Dr. Anthony Fauci and pushing vaccines.
In a contentious interview with conservative host Megyn Kelly, Trump mounted an unusual pushback against right-wing critics who say he was too chummy with Fauci and too gung-ho about developing vaccines.
“ People say, ‘You saved 100 million lives,'” Trump said.
I really think Trump supporters may be the stupidest demographic out there.
You really need to read Scott Atlas's book about what went on in the White House during COVID. He was called in to advise and nearly lost his mind. Between Pence, Birx, Fauci and Jared, Trump (with his lack of savvy and basic knowledge) never stood a chance. He was completely railroaded. Not that it excuses him in any way--the buck stops with him, obviously, and the worst thing is he can't admit it to himself. But it is more complex than you think.
Like I said earlier Trump had months to resign, instead he made the whole thing possible and has continued to brag about “saving lives” and being the “father” of the vaccine:
“ Former US president Donald Trump has claimed that he is “the father of the vaccine” for coronavirus, attacking his successor Joe Biden for taking credit for the much-improved US response to the crisis.”
And people want him on the ballot! 😂
https://www.vanityfair.com/news/2021/04/trumps-latest-delusion-im-the-father-of-the-vaccine
Definitely not a good look! I voted for him twice, and also lost my 23 year job because of this crap. Call me jaded…
Trump is an Actor and a very clever one.
I’m sorry you lost your job. 🙏🏽🙁
Yes, his claims are ridiculous, but you keep saying "he had months to resign." WTF? Are suggesting he should have resigned before his term was up? That he somehow did not leave at the end of his term? What is your point here? I agree that Trump is a bad choice and I'd never vote for him anymore than I'd vote for Biden (who is a much more malign force IMO), but why is it any stupider to vote for Trump than to vote for Biden?
I never said Biden was any better or worse than Trump- I said elections are fake and I said that Trump should have resigned because he lost control of the country.
Maybe Trump should have RFK as he’s vice president so he wont be stupidly bambozeled next time.
I was quite enthusiastic about Kennedy until he managed to vitiate his entire platform with his sophomoric and ignorant response to 10/7. Even then if he had shown the slightest inclination to become better informed as time went on I would have given him a break, but he has shown himself to be no better than Trump or Biden--completely captured by a foreign entity that has shown itself to be deeply dishonest and barbaric.
Mabye this time they can do Operation Ludicrous Speed
he had RFK's phone number the first time and didn't use it. he had lots of advisers he could have reached out to. he trusted fauci instead. fauci, the king of the swamp.
despite all his rhetoric, trump got PLAYED by the swamp. looks like he'll win again - and he'll be better than biden in many ways - but he'll get played again, too. and we will all pay.
Yes, thats why he needs a good vp and better advisors
I don’t disagree with many of your points but I do disagree that trump supporters ( me being one of them) are stupid. We have binary choices. That is our system. Only one person can be President. Personally, I don’t think we should allow ANYONE to tell us what to do, not a president et, not a legislature, not a city council, not a cop, and so on. As far as I am concerned, government’s ONLY role is to protect the inhabitants of that town or village or tribe or family or nation from invaders. Nothing else. Government should not be dictating a fingernail’s worth of mandates or bans to any individual.
You definitely have a choice not to vote and to keep reminding people of what happened in 2020 and under whose administration it happened.
This whole ballot stuff is a way for “them” to demoralise those of us who still have principles, integrity and intelligence to differentiate between good and evil, right and wrong. American elections are psychological torture.
What was the last election that you voted for a president? I always find myself voting against a candidate (now party).
Honestly.... jojo the hair sniffer is the better actor/stuntman... got everyone fooled he's brain dead and can't walk or ride bike without falling...why has he never been injured in any of these stunt's??(uh I mean accidents...LOL) Most people his age, that hit the deck, break bones!? He reminds me of the mob boss; Vinny "the Chin" Gigante who wandered the streets of Greenwich Village in his bathrobe and slippers, mumbling incoherently to himself, to get an insanity plea.
As for our vote/ballots.....two words come to mind....Electoral College
It's all a rich mans game....
Don't let your instinctual tribalism rule your thoughts.
Absolutely agree S.2. Both parties are one and the same and run by the same predatory globalists who we never elected. They get to choose who they want for next President before we go vote at the polls. My husband and I no longer vote in these Presidential elections knowing what we know as our votes no longer count and we don't want to give them any credibility. Actually, since the stolen 2020 election was never resolved, why should we even continue to vote? And why would it be any different this 2024 election? They don't work for us.
Totally agree...sad but true
No need to be sad anymore..: but feelings are feelings and they deserve to be felt. What “they” want is for us to emote, not rationally apprise the situation… 🙏🏽
Now it’s time for the narcissist to take a long look in the mirror— you know .. examine the heart of the one staring back …
"fog of war" - 4 years later he is still promoting the jab, still has not acknowledged a single jab injury or death. boy that's a pretty thick fog. and it's apparently only hovering over his head specifically, like Linus from peanuts i suppose.
what a nonsense argument. trump had plenty of advisers, including a very willing RFK Jr, who would have walked him through it. he ignored them. total lack of discernment, which is the most important leadership quality. he got PLAYED. he's going to drain the swamp??? yeah right. he stood right next to the king of the swamp (fauci) for like 100 different press conferences, didn't do anything to stop him.
Absolutely.. trusting is a funny thing. Evil presents itself as a gift.
Fool me once…
If he is much wiser then why he is toting Sea Island Resort Tim Scott around w/him? I am pretty tired of hearing 3D chess, keep your enemies closer, and all the other cute excuses. What gives w/Scott? Trump should not have that guy anywhere near him.
I know, he's a very imperfect vessel. But he's what we've got. I do feel that most of the snakes and RINOs have been shaken out of his camp in the last few years, but still he will need the counsel and advice of clear-seeing allies like Steve Bannon and Roger Stone and Tucker Carlson to make the full house-cleaning of Washington happen.
The only people I trust to be around Trump is Eric Trump, Dan Scavino, and Stephen Miller. That's it.
Trump was very aware of the corruption in our govt. When he was elected, he was surrounded by DS swamp. Did he get rid of the swamp? NO Was Hillary arrested for her many crimes? NO I could go on, but sorry to say Trump is PART of the SWAMP.
In the 90's, Rothschild Banker Wilbur Ross bailed out Trump when he failed to pay back the high-interest loans he had taken out to build his casino empire. So, when he got elected he paid back the favor by picking Ross to be his Commerce Secretary.
Poor, poor Donald. Let's give him another chance to blow his mouth off for the cameras and the suckers while he pompously and blissfully floats through the next 4 years,, too ignorant and impotent to steer this government.
You hope.
The puss and infection is oozing out tonight, get ready!
Stay on point. Trump was never indicted for insurrection. Case closed.
OWS, with all of its failings and clearly exposing Trump as a hyper-Keynesian, is not the controversy at bar.
I’m just trying to grapple how people could be so stupid as to support someone like Trump. They claim to be “patriots” but are guilty of aiding in the destruction of the country.
Not sure exactly what you mean… do I have Trump derangement syndrome? I’m pretty sure that in a sane universe he wouldn’t be near any position of power. Alas…
“ As democracy is perfected, the office of president represents, more and more closely, the inner soul of the people. On some great and glorious day the plain folks of the land will reach their heart's desire at last and the White House will be adorned by a downright moron.“
What a profoundly sick country we have. 🙁
Perfection for a democracy is mob rule, that is why we have a republic!
Read Sasha Latypova latest post..
I’ll check it out.
Same as Trump. Elections are fake. There’s no curtain call on this nightmare theater.
or is a israel( apartheid) ASSLICKER
Gov by Jared Kushner. Awful:
Why Kushner? Are you saying that he called the shots last time? On what basis?
I can’t remember a son in law having such a prominent role in any other administration… I’ll have to jog my memory… he was the Senior Advisor to Trump and The Office of American Innovation (OAI) was an office within the White House Office created by the Trump administration on March 27, 2017
The purpose of the office was to "make recommendations to the President on policies and plans that improve Government operations and services, improve the quality of life for Americans now and in the future, and spur job creation."[2]
The Office was directed by President Trump’s son-in-law Jared Kushner,[3][4][5] Senior Advisor to the President.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Office_of_American_Innovation
The scamdemic was/is a revolution into a technocracy if I’m not mistaken… it looks like he played set up for it in some way or another
“ When a dozen and a half CEOs of the world’s biggest tech companies descended on the White House last month, it turned a spotlight on one of the bigger mysteries of a mysterious White House: They were convened by the Office of American Innovation, the new operation being run by presidential son-in-law Jared Kushner. Announced with much fanfare by the president in March, the office was set up to bring “new thinking and real change” to the country’s toughest problems, according to Trump, in part by drawing on the lessons of the private sector.”
Actually while it may not appear so on the surface now we are headed for a theocracy more than a technocracy. The church will control the state and implement the Sunday mark.
Revelation 14:6-12
"An thou swearest by that that is not, thou art not forsworn." Meaning, in this case, that you can't be guilty of participating in an insurrection if there WAS no insurrection. And there WAS no insurrection. A protest, yes. A riot? Okay. But I've seen bigger riots after a football game. The whole 14th Amendment angle was prima facie preposterous. Only a complete fool or a complete liar could pitch it with a straight face. I'll leave it to better minds to sort out who was which.
Great news!
Now that what the democraps thought to be a mortal smear of invoking an insurrection has been finally put to rest what on earth will they try next ? Epstein photos or videos perhaps ? A feeble , dementia riddled psychopath versus a callous and bumbling buffoon is a stinging indictment of the adage that one gets the democracy they deserve
Well, not really. It's been decades since our electoral outcomes were determined by the will of the electorate. To fault the voters—and electoral democracy itself—for the serial theft of our elections by covert operatives is, to say the least, unfair.
I take a more cynical view in that the “epidemic” of apathy and ignorance towards those who treat us like farm animals will continue to do so until it becomes perilous for them to continue with their machinations
The voters know a fraud when they see it, like Boaty McBoatFace.
Boaty McBoatface - exposing the biased pluralist polity of the Establishment
https://iaindavis.substack.com/p/boaty-mcboatface-exposing-the-biased
Someone like Pat Paulsen should change their name to Votey McVoteface and run for President.
Votey McVoteface would ideally be an attractive person of the ethnicity du jour, and always speak in a torrent of the most current language regarding the issues of the day but say precisely nothing, so as to make an effective mockery of the process as it currently exists.
OK....we should not vote for a "callous" and "bumbling" person because of....they are "uncouth" even if they are patriotic and care about the average citizen in words and deeds?
Even in your super-sarcastic descriptions you could not hide the difference between a "psychopath" who by definition is a criminal- he opens the borders, scurries out of Afghanistan leaving behind powerful weapons and FORCED the vaxx on us, VS a "rough" President who does not fit in the "cool" talk-show laughter.
You've touched on the great propagandistic lie : Trump is being unfairly persecuted not for his mostly lock step and fascistic policies ( Operation warp speed, The Cares act 2020 along with assorted bombings and assassinations of people "we" don't like ) but his inability to project a smooth and professional image in keeping with the PR machine of the empire. I go by actions and policies not image despite my truncated description of 2 of the worst presidents in modern history. If it gives you solace to remain on the Trump train and believe him to be America's savior than by all means keep enjoying the ride.
Computer programmer Clinton Eugene Curtis testifies in a Senate committee back in year 2004 about voting software he wrote that could flip any election 51/49 with whomever you wanted to win....you wouldn't know it without specific knowledge of the source code and/or the original votes that you could manually count. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JEzY2tnwExs (4 min)
Dr Shiva already lived through in-your-face election fraud where the ballot images were outright deleted by election officials while running for US Senate for Massachusetts that was admitted to and exposed in court discovery, along with collusion with big tech: www.WinBackFreedom.com . Shiva also uncovered similar "weighted" election voting software used that allows a hidden multiplier to be used against each group of voters; similar to a homeowners association where owner votes are weighted based on the square footage owned.
This Trump case is completely overshadowing real corruption of election fraud committed against Dr Shiva Ayyadurai .....and conveniently Shiva's 2024 presidential campaign. "They" really don't want Dr Shiva to get anywhere near a debate stage.
There will never be another presidential election that is not 51-49 ever again. It doesn't matter how awful the candidates are. The software says so.
It's all theater. DJT will be the next hapless 'leader' installed as chief exec. He has been the deep states plan for the last 10 years. He will keep his little hands busy for the next 5 years doing their bidding and he will be the fall guy for the complete implosion of the American nation, just as Brandon has been the inept fall guy for the decimation of global American prestige . It's obvious and too sickening to watch.
That's exactly what I've started to think myself.
As an Canadian following your politics for ever this is a fascinating case in democracy. I am utterly amazed that your democracy has devolved to this. From my perspective as a Canadian, regardless of what you think about Trump it has been a witch hunt from day one. Why does he so terrify the powers that be.
Disruption - the deep state is concerned that the usual money flows and payola might be impacted - when you realize American politics is just one big grift it becomes clearer.
I don't know why they are concerned. The grift never stops, no matter the "leader" or "president." There is nothing new under the sun. It has always been this way and always will be this way.
They ruled according to US law, which I admit, is an interesting change! I believe this is because the way is being cleared for President Trump by those who truly run this govt. Still, this was a correct, lawful ruling!
But man, you gotta wonder why they had to make an amendment to stop a person from being VOTED for who was convicted of insurrection, a purely subjective judgement by the people in power.
If that amendment was applied to the founding fathers, they would not be able to run for office for their "insurrection" haha.
And if the insurrectionist is such a bad guy, people will just not vote for him or her. But no, we needed a law to disqualify them,
Really freaking dumb.
They could have rigged a conviction so the banning would be legal. They didn't. They're dumb and lazy. We got the limp dick dystopia, not 1984 anymore.
https://robc137.substack.com/p/looking-behind-the-curtain-of-oz
Not dumb, petty: They were angry with the South and did not want a repeat. It was a short-sighted amendment, but they expected many confederates to be very popular with their local constituencies. It was not primarily concerned with the presidency, after all, but any elected office.
In short, they didn't want a repeat of what had just happened---or to have to sit in a chamber with Jefferson Davis being Minority Whip (no pun intended).
Ahh now I get it. I heard how the south was pretty much battered into submission by the north- because the rules of business changed.
Thanks for this info!
Trump was NOT convicted of insurection
I know. I was saying even if he was, it's a stupid amendment.
They did this amendment to screw over the South after the civil war.
As always, you got into the meat of this story. Thank you!
This ruling should be considered propaganda/manipulation. It was correctly decided according to US law but we need to ask why has the SC taken US law seriously on this case, while in most others, they utterly ignore it.
I go back to 2005-2007 when I could actually get incredibly good reporting from NPR. I could hear national and international opinion and news that NPR never presented before or after that time period. I believe this reporting was done for the purpose of electing Obama as it ceased as soon as he was elected.
For example I could hear anti war analysis until Obama was elected, then it stopped, full stop, and NPR was back to plugging war! NPR presented speakers who explained the illegality of torture. Full stop. Presidential overreach? Yes, then full stop. And so on.
The SC has made so many unconstitutional rulings where justices appear befuddled and unwilling to grapple with facts and logic. All of a sudden, they could think again, reason, knew the law. That is very strange. It seems like they are told what ruling they need to make and why. It bears thinking about why this ruling was lucid and lawful.