Share this comment
I hate to be the bearer of bad news, but so was 9/11. It was all controlled demolition and the evidence is overwhelming -- remember Building 7? I thought not, I didn't either. See ae911truth.org (architects and engineers for 9/11 Truth -- their video makes this beyond any doubt ). See also Pilots for 9/11 Truth. See the works of David Ra…
I hate to be the bearer of bad news, but so was 9/11. It was all controlled demolition and the evidence is overwhelming -- remember Building 7? I thought not, I didn't either. See www.AE911Truth.org (architects and engineers for 9/11 Truth -- their video makes this beyond any doubt ). See also Pilots for 9/11 Truth. See the works of David Ray Griffin and articles by Paul Craig Roberts (Asst. Sec'y of Treasury under Reagan) on his website.
You don't have to dig very deep to find out the truth, plus this is another one of those things like the JFK assassination where the government does a shabby investigation then destroys the evidence. Same holds for the Pentagon crash and Flight 93.
I only came across this last August while I was reading, in bed with a mild case of the Wuhan flu. Took me two weeks before I could eat anything after having to readjust my entire understanding of what happened on that tragic day.
Good luck with the Truth.
PS The Truth does not always set you free. Sometimes it puts you permanently into deep, dark waters.
I’ve been in “deep dark waters” for quite a few years. Once you’re awake, everything you see is totally DIFFERENT!
I know, Renee. It changed me forever. I used to be active in the local Republican party, but I find I can't even relate to them anymore. It's weird, isn't it?
No, it’s not weird at all! I feel the same way! I’m out! I’m done supporting government. After I see what’s been done in this country from BOTH parties, I will not add fuel to the dumpster fire.
It’s worse than I ever imagined.
It can be very depressing. Such evil in this world.
Because everyone in power or media ignored the blatant 9/11 False Flag we got the Iraq & Afghanistan wars, and libya & Syria. Millions of deaths. And the Covid Plandemic. And further back the JFK, RFK, MLK assassinations. Let evil rein free and it will just keep growing.
I remember the controlled demolition of Building 7 on the day it happened. For the past 20+ years I have been telling everyone I know and on many online forums that 911 was orchestrated by the U.S. DIPs (demons in power). Who was in charge then? The RepubRats with retarded Bush Jr at the helm.
No one cared 20 years ago and no one cares now.
Now the DemonRats are in charge with retarded Biden at the helm. Nothing changes. It is all BS and grifting 24/7/365.
Outrageous claims. Next you'll be saying that the War of 1812 (which EEUU lost) was about Madison wanting to annex Canada. (General Isaac Brock and Tecumseh thwarted Madison's ambitions despite the U.S. having a 20 to 1 advantage in men and material. ) And you'll probably also claim that Japan was provoked into bombing Pearl Harbor, that Roosevelt knew it was going to happen, and that the atom bombs that murdered hundreds of thousands of Japanese civilians were really a warning to the USSR.
Sounds like you have a lot of in depth real research to do on all things historical and political, as well as in the biological sciences.
Sounds like you're incapable of recognizing irony.
The U.S. lost the War of 1812, Japan was provoked by economic sanctions and the transfer of American naval base from San Diego to Pearl Harbor, and that revolting psychopath Truman dropped two atomic bombs on civilians for no good reason except to intimidate Stalin.
Sorry, hard to tell when no context. Still, you're not getting the whole Pearl Harbor thing correct, none of history is correct, literally none. And your comment about David Martin leads one to realize you still have some more to research and uncover.
I like some things David Martin says but not all.
I don't trust gurus.
I agree with you about history and while I suspect the official stories of everything are suspect,
we can only guess what really happened.
I apologize for the sharpness of my comment and suspect that if we ever met and shared a conversation, we'd agree on most things.
No apology necessary, but thank you.
These forms of communication are lacking greatly, unfortunately. I'd say that most on this particular substack are at least well on their way to finding just how much of our perceived lives have been an illusion and it's a long journey to travel, but the willingness and open mindedness to do so is commendable. It helps to be a natural rebel with an insatiable curiosity for answers to everything.
" It helps to be a natural rebel with an insatiable curiosity for answers to everything."
I could not agree more strongly.
It was only recently that I really got an in depth education on the Civil War, and what it really was and the actual events. At this point I personally don't need to study any more "history" because it's quite clear not a single thing is what we were taught, whether passed down from parents (they had no clue either) or taught in the classroom or by media in any form. I am focused mostly on just moving forward enjoying life as I want it to be.
All the best to you and your own journey!
Whatever happened to Pilots for 9/11 Truth?
Good question. I can't find a link.
A friend who is a pilot can't believe anyone who never flew a jetliner could get behind the controls and fly the thing into a building.
What's more a standard passenger jet could not penetrate the heavy outer columns on the trade centers. The planes were exchanged for drones, you can see the communications/control pod on the bottom of the plane that flew into WTC2. So the drones had to have been fitted with standard military penetrating ordnance on the front of the wings & fuselage. Off chance they could have used armored wings & front fuselage to penetrate the heavy steel, but I suspect they used shaped charges instead.
And, of course, that explains Flight 93, which almost certainly was meant to fly into WTC7, but had a control malfunction so it veered off course and they had to shoot it down, spreading debris over a wide area. One small piece likely fell into that hole at Shanksville, but no way a full plane could even come remotely close to burrowing into that ground. There are such things as the laws of Physics.
9/11 PODs and Remote Control Plane Theory:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yMayTWzOGY0
9/11 PODs and Remote Control Plane Theory - video Dailymotion WTC2 video, Flight 175, Boeing 767-222/ER:
https://www.dailymotion.com/video/x2p7wmu
Gallery | 9/11 Anomalies Plane Boeing 767 crash into WTC2 pictures, remote control pod
https://911anomalies.wordpress.com/gallery/
"....First off, all serious researchers aside from Morgan Reynolds (a former Bush economist) agree that planes actually hit the towers, however the planes that hit the towers had no windows and extra equipment attached (PODs) and are believed to be remote control drone aircraft. In fact, a similar plan was devised in 1962 by Robert McNamara called OPERATION NORTHWOODS which detailed flying an aircraft filled with FBI agents (allegedly college students on vacation) in flight the plane would switch transponder signals with a drone aircraft which would then be shot down over Cuba. The FBI agents on the plane would then land safely and resume new covert identities. There is evidence that a similar plot was hatched on 9/11:
Thomas Deatherage, Former Airline Captain B- 747-400 and B- 737-300: "After viewing many posted videos on "Youtube" I can tell you without hesitation that clearly aircraft # 2 B-767 - was radio controlled into the building Tower 2. The "pod" mounted on the bottom of the aircraft, is manufactured by "Martin Marietta" Corporation in Los Angeles. The pod has been used extensively by the USAF for outfitting drone aircraft for over 22 years, and you can clearly see it in (4) of the amateur videos- just before impact, with tower # 2. Also, I would like to find an insider A and P mechanic at both United and America to cross reference the A/C serial number of flight 77 and 93. I guarantee that they change the N issued tail number. However, one could trace and find this original A/C, from an insider employee, at these companies- leading to the smoking gun these aircraft were not destroyed."
The buildings were planted with explosives to cause a controlled demolition.
Yes, we all know that, but they would not be able to precisely blow a hole into the side of a building in the shape of an airplane right where the drone happens to hit. So they would have had to mount shaped charges on the front of the drones to cut those holes into the structure, so the drone could explode inside the building.
Do a search on Bitchute about the truth about 911 - total deception created the false belief that jets took down the Twin Towers. Holograms were used to create special effects to convince people they actually saw it happen.
ReBecca: Rebekah Roth does a good job of laying out how they pulled it off, including the Airbase where the original planes were diverted to, and where the impossible phone calls were made from. As well as the unusual language used in the phone calls, like they were reading from a script.
https://rumble.com/v1jpaz8-flight-attendant-911-methodical-illusion-by-rebekah-roth.html
Just for clarification the person called ReBecca on here is not me. Someone confused us. I am another Rebecca who occasionally posts about the need for a real 9/11 investigation. However, I am not a proponent of the "holograms" theory. I lived in NYC on 9/11 and knew multiple people who worked in and near the WTC, some of whom were around the area at the time it happened. My then fiancé also worked 2-3 blocks away from the WTC complex on 9/11.
Thank you ReBecca and SmithFS for the links and suggestions.
I've read a lot about 911 and seen Mazzucco's excellent movie:
https://www.imdb.com/title/tt3828916/?ref_=nv_sr_srsg_0_tt_4_nm_4_q_New%2520Pearl%2520
I suspect ReBecca is right about the building being seeded with explosives and agree with a lot of SFS's info. Look forward to checking out some of the links he provided.
I suspect the buildings were actually hit by planes but don't know which planes.
The original planes could have been taken over by remote control.
If I might recommend two good dvds:
911 MYSTERIES
ZERO: AN INVESTIGATION OF 911
Again, I thank you both for sharing links and info.
Ignorance is bliss. Knowledge can be torture.
Diane, I agree that you don't have to dig very deep into 9/11 to see that the official version of events makes no sense at all. The people who come up with these official stories are idiots. What they think sounds good shows that they're midwit liars at best. With so much evidence destroyed, though, finding the truth isn't easy.
From the first day, Building 7 was the smoking gun. The building wasn't damaged enough to make it unsafe, and pulling off an obvious controlled demolition simply showed anyone who noticed it happening that the towers had been demolished with explosives as well. The fact that the media immediately reported it as having collapsed on its own was final proof.
I also remembered how Rudy Giuliani helped establish and promote the whole idiotic official 9/11 lie. The fact that he became Trump's closest advisor during the election theft should have awakened any Trump supporters who were still asleep, but...
On 9/11 I knew someone in the vicinity of Building 7 the morning of 9/11. He was told by either police or FD that the building would have to be demolished "because it is damaged." We were just a bit surprised when the building then spontaneously apparently demolished itself several hours later... smh
SMH, as well. I didn't catch it on the day it happened, but the BBC reporter's broadcast with the view of Bldg7 in the background was also an eye-opener, once I read about it, in subsequent days. The way the media outlets were coordinating so completely was eerie, to say the least. That old southern saying comes to mind: "When everybody's telling the same tale, it's bound to be a lie".
That whole day must have been unreal to people who witnessed it on the ground.